Quote from: Natasha on January 25, 2008, 06:01:53 PM
you didn't? why not? i want you to march the streets for me, i want you to tattoo the trans label on your forehead, i want you to tell the entire population you're ts & deal with the consequences! 
you know what the problem is nichole? that everybody wants you to do what they do! baloney! it isn't happening in this lifetime! 
Ya know, Tasha, I don't even think it's a problem, sweetie. Well, not for me. It's their problem, because you're right; it's not happening in this lifetime.
Nichole
----------------------------------------
Let me get this right. 10% that's a few magnitudes higher than even the most remarkable speculations of Lynn Conway.
There's almost as many trans-people in USA as there are African-Americans?

I imagine that therapist should stick with therapy and leave statistics to the statisticians and economists.
As for Sarah's opine: And who will be leading all these T-people in this campaign? I can only imagine!!
Besides 10% and 52% are rather far apart as percentages. And even at that how many women embraced this anonymous feminist's platform and took to snatching power?
I truly do appreciate activists. For instance, it would be nice if Marti Abernathy were to have joined this forum and decided to weigh-in with some commentary about activism. I enjoy reading her ideas and commentaries. But see, I know something of her history. She's paid some dues in her life; and she's earned my respect, affection and admiration if not always my agreement.
Nichole
P.S.
What if the issue is NOT about gender at all? Except for the 'transgendered.'
What if, for transsexuals, the problem is about 'sex' -- a physical problem that has nothing to do with 'gender?' Could that be why Mr. Prince felt a need to destroy us? To make the world safe for CDs and TVs, gender-queers? Ya gotta wonder.
That would sorta take this entire thread into a kinda permanent 'moot' state wouldn't it?
Just a thought.
N~