a lot of what's wrong...

[jan c]

"A lot of things wrong with society today are directly attributable to the fact that the people who make the
laws are sexually maladjusted."
any comments...

[HelenW]

". . .  the fact that the people who make the
laws are sexually maladjusted."

Uhh, how do you know that?  Is that really a fact or an opinion or mere speculation?

[jan c]

Helen! I not only have the information, I know, it is wisdom and it is true.
I would dearly love to see someone refute it. 

[jamesBrine]

hey! (i write from a canadian point of view on this)
      From what I understand in Canada I do not believe it is fair to speak such a comment because it is rooting all its problems in one thing, Not all issues root from people trying to keep marriage in its traditional understanding. In canada our laws support gay marriage we still have problems. I would love to see your evidence.
     James

[Alexandra]

"A lot of things wrong with society today are directly attributable to the fact that the people who make the
laws are sexually maladjusted."
any comments...

But then they were freely elected. apparently at least half or America's voters want sexually maladjusted lawmakers.

[jan c]

But then they were freely elected. apparently at least half or America's voters want sexually maladjusted lawmakers.

that would PROBABLY be TRUE because most if not all voters here are sexually maladjusted.

DISCLAIMER: THIS THREAD IS FOR ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES ONLY. Any investment made in its contents, and  this includes emotional investments made in our lawmakers, or our system of laws, may contain some risk.


Posted at: April 30, 2006, 05:44:13 AM

But then they were freely elected. apparently at least half or America's voters want sexually maladjusted lawmakers.

A guy, probably quite sexually maladjusted, was 'freely elected' in Germany some 3/4s of a century ago. This may mean that 'at least half' of the voters really did want to see a good bit of the population ultimately decimated because of their differences, and that these voters had a lot in common with the maladjustments of Der Fuhrer's sexuality.
Now let's extrapolate this to how this thread relates to a transgendered community.

[jamesBrine]

hey
"was 'freely elected' in Germany some 3/4s of a century ago. This may mean that 'at least half' of the voters really did want to see a good bit of the population ultimately decimated because of their differences" I understand that this thread is entertainment and that alone but comments like these are insulting. I agree this thread can be alot of fun but please don't let it become a place to attack or bash people who disagree with the GBLT for they have there right to believe as they do and believe it free from attacks from others.
      James!

[jan c]

hey james,

hey! (i write from a canadian point of view on this)
      From what I understand in Canada I do not believe it is fair to speak such a comment because it is rooting *all* its problems in one thing, Not all issues root from people trying to keep marriage in its traditional understanding. In canada our laws support gay marriage we still have problems. I would love to see your evidence.
     James

I did not say "all", I said "a lot of things". As per 'evidence': Look around you.
It is my assertion, and I am not exactly seeing a lot of response to indicate otherwise here, that many of the problems in society can be rooted in sexuality. That is our little topic of discussion. I do not disinclude myself from the society as a whole in this phenomenon. If you take exception to this, and choose to ignore our little programme's disclaimer, you are free to disqualify yourself as a contestant.
[NB: The topic, as it reads so far, is not to do with what person is necessarily able to legally marry another.]
BTW: who have I attacked exactly; the good citizens of Germany of the 1930's, who are understandably proud of the results of their democracy during that decade and the following illustrious times? (which I did in order to form an analogy) Are you posing as an apologist for that regime? For the Amerikan regime of today?

[jamesBrine]

hey!
     My apologies on using the term "all" when I should have used the term "alot of things." May you please give me the reference to where you found that comment. Maybe i'm missing your sarcasim in this comment "the good citizens of Germany of the 1930's, who are understandably proud of the results of their democracy during that decade and the following illustrious times?" Maybe i'm over reacting but many to all Germans are not proud of this moment. correct me if I missed your sarcasim.

[jan c]

you are apparently missing a lot; it would appear to be self-evident that the good citizens of Deutschland made a big mistake in 1930. Now it is true that at least many Germans own their history. Many merely give lip service to owning those times. Some are quite proud of that period. You'd think humans would be capable of evolving and learn some kind of lesson from this kind of thing, but it appears that could be wishful thinking, at least as it concerns systems of governance.

When there are those in this Amerikan society that would just as soon see me and others similar to me basically cease to exist, and attempt to legislate those who are different out of existence, as much as is possible, and subvert the law of the land in order to do this, 'cause I'm/we're a pervert(s) in their little minds, I am going to feel absolutely free to attack their 'values'; and I am absolutely not going to be even a tiny bit apologetic about it.



Posted at: May 04, 2006, 04:31:45 PM

don't let it become a place to attack or bash people who disagree with the GBLT for they have there right to believe as they do and believe it free from attacks from others.
      James!

I would be one of those to disagree with any such large 'umbrella' of a group quite often. And you betcha I'm free.

[jan c]

the very top of this thread would SEEM to indicate a non-PC posture, straight up.
Exemplo Gratio: "Hitler was a perv" is going to offend somebody.
oh we-ell...