Susan's Place Logo

News:

Since its founding in 1995 Susan's Place forums have blossomed into a truly global lifeline. To date we've delivered roughly 1.4 billion page views to hundreds of millions of unique visitors, guided more than 41,000 registered members through 1,985,081 posts and 188,474 topics across 193 boards, and—most importantly—helped save tens of thousands of lives by connecting people to vital information and support at their most vulnerable moments.

Main Menu

Q Of The Day: When Does Not Revealing Natal Sex Constitute Lying? (blog/commenta

Started by Shana A, April 12, 2008, 08:18:51 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

Shana A

April 12, 2008, 08:18:51 AM
Q Of The Day: When Does Not Revealing Natal Sex Constitute Lying?
by: Autumn Sandeen
Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 05:00:00 AM EDT

http://www.pamshouseblend.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=5048

The Houston Chronicle is reporting Plaintiff wins round in transgender case. At issue:

    She says she didn't get the job because she was born male.

    The company says it wasn't that, claiming she misrepresented herself.

"Be yourself; everyone else is already taken." Oscar Wilde
  •  

Natasha

#1
April 12, 2008, 02:23:18 PM
Q Of The Day: When Does Not Revealing Natal Sex Constitute Lying?

http://www.pamshouseblend.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=5048
4/12/2008

"In a letter rescinding the job, the employer complained she
presented herself as a woman at her interview, but the background
check revealed she was a man."
  •  
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions