Susan's Place Logo

News:

Based on internal web log processing I show 3,417,511 Users made 5,324,115 Visits Accounting for 199,729,420 pageviews and 8.954.49 TB of data transfer for 2017, all on a little over $2,000 per month.

Help support this website by Donating or Subscribing! (Updated)

Main Menu

Q Of The Day: When Does Not Revealing Natal Sex Constitute Lying? (blog/commenta

Started by Shana A, April 12, 2008, 08:18:51 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

Shana A

April 12, 2008, 08:18:51 AM
Q Of The Day: When Does Not Revealing Natal Sex Constitute Lying?
by: Autumn Sandeen
Sat Apr 12, 2008 at 05:00:00 AM EDT

http://www.pamshouseblend.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=5048

The Houston Chronicle is reporting Plaintiff wins round in transgender case. At issue:

    She says she didn't get the job because she was born male.

    The company says it wasn't that, claiming she misrepresented herself.

"Be yourself; everyone else is already taken." Oscar Wilde
  •  

Natasha

#1
April 12, 2008, 02:23:18 PM
Q Of The Day: When Does Not Revealing Natal Sex Constitute Lying?

http://www.pamshouseblend.com/showDiary.do?diaryId=5048
4/12/2008

"In a letter rescinding the job, the employer complained she
presented herself as a woman at her interview, but the background
check revealed she was a man."
  •  
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions