Quote from: tekla on June 13, 2008, 09:00:56 AM
It's interesting to see how the emotional intelligence differs from academic intelligence.
If you like this, you will love Grad School where everyday is an adventure between these two things.
The trouble with this, or any such test begins with the notions of who wrote the thing to begin with. How do they weigh the factors? Is Emotional Intelligence more a matter of 'compassion' or is it 'composure'? (Just to take one set of values.)
Yeah, that's true. And, how did they know what the 'right' answer to some of the questions was? With those people in the pictures, for example. Were they asked beforehand?
Emotions aren't as black and white as equations and algorithms. And they certainly aren't so obvious. When you take an IQ test, you either get the answer right or wrong. I took a MENSA one once and scored 139. But they're like school exams; you could easily be taught how to do very well on them.
It's a little arbitrary to say that the way someone's feeling is right or wrong. It'd be fun to be able to say:
"Maybe she
was terrified, you don't know. For all you know she could have just bolted out of the house because her partner wouldn't stop throwing rabid gerbils at her. Only she hides it
really well. And she wouldn't want to tell her friends about her diseased rodent abuse because they wouldn't believe her, or would think she was crazy.
So maybe she just
looks bored, but is secretly scared witless of the airborne furry death that's waiting for her when she goes home.
In which case I'm right, you're wrong, and this test is too superficial to be of value.
Nyah!

"