Susan's Place Logo

News:

Since its founding in 1995 Susan's Place forums have blossomed into a truly global lifeline. To date we've delivered roughly 1.4 billion page views to hundreds of millions of unique visitors, guided more than 41,000 registered members through 1,985,081 posts and 188,474 topics across 193 boards, and—most importantly—helped save tens of thousands of lives by connecting people to vital information and support at their most vulnerable moments.

Main Menu

Discrimination law skirts around ->-bleeped-<- issue

Started by Natasha, June 24, 2008, 05:37:35 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

Natasha

June 24, 2008, 05:37:35 PM
Discrimination law skirts around ->-bleeped-<- issue

http://www.hrzone.co.uk/cgi-bin/item.cgi?id=185043
6/24/2008

"Barrister Charles Price examines a recent case in Australia involving alleged discrimination against a ->-bleeped-<-, and looks at the equivalent law in the UK in an employment context.  Luck certainly wasn't a lady for ->-bleeped-<- Paul Hurst recently, when he was rejected from a casino for being dressed 'inappropriately'. Last month, The Age reported from Australia in its article, 'Stuck Between a Frock and a Card Place' that Hurst, or Anne Marie to his friends, had been asked to leave a casino because of his appearance. Australian lawyers are now debating whether ->-bleeped-<-s are protected in law."
  •  
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions