Susan's Place Logo

News:

Since its founding in 1995 Susan's Place forums have blossomed into a truly global lifeline. To date we've delivered roughly 1.4 billion page views to hundreds of millions of unique visitors, guided more than 41,000 registered members through 1,985,081 posts and 188,474 topics across 193 boards, and—most importantly—helped save tens of thousands of lives by connecting people to vital information and support at their most vulnerable moments.

Main Menu

Review of the Bindel/Stryker Debate

Started by Natasha, December 07, 2008, 08:47:31 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Natasha

Review of the Bindel/Stryker Debate

http://auntysarah.livejournal.com/174349.html
12/7/2008

Friday's debate between feminist academic, Susan Stryker and Guardian journalist, Julie Bindel, hosted by Stephen Whittle of Press for Change was a more or less predictable affair, and I think nobody came out of it well.

Susan Stryker opened and started to take apart various things Bindel has said in a rational and scientific way. She demonstrated several areas where Bindel was factually incorrect (such as her position that medical transsexualism was a model "invented" by heretonormative psychiatrists in the 1950s, when the work was actually pioneered 20 years earlier by a German Jewish sex researcher and gay-rights campaigner and suggested that in holding trans people responsible for the attitudes of medical gatekeepers, Bindel was engaging in victim-blaming. She spoke about how Bindel's argument is not reasoned; rather it comes from a position of ideology and projection of her own feelings about sex-reassignment onto other people. Bindel, she said, fails to realise that other people may have different feelings and motivations to herself.
  •