Susan's Place Logo

News:

Since its founding in 1995 Susan's Place forums have blossomed into a truly global lifeline. To date we've delivered roughly 1.4 billion page views to hundreds of millions of unique visitors, guided more than 41,000 registered members through 1,985,081 posts and 188,474 topics across 193 boards, and—most importantly—helped save tens of thousands of lives by connecting people to vital information and support at their most vulnerable moments.

Main Menu

Responding to Obama: We can disagree without being disagreeable, but Rick Warren

Started by Natasha, December 18, 2008, 05:21:39 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Natasha

Responding to Obama: We can disagree without being disagreeable, but Rick Warren cannot

http://www.bilerico.com/2008/12/responding_to_obama_we_can_disagree_with.php
Alex Blaze
December 18, 2008 3:00 PM

The Obama team has come out with its official talking points on the Warren invocation, and there's nothing there that's all too surprising. They want the celebrity power at their ceremony but they don't want to take responsibility for picking a known homophobe and extreme-right ideologue.

This battle isn't about the fact that someone who disagrees on politics is being brought into the fold. This is about someone who's a liar and a charlatan being brought into the big tent, someone, who, if he had his way, would kick the rest of us out. This is someone who doesn't agree with Obama on anything and who has specifically stated that his political opinions are non-negotiable. This is someone who worked on behalf of Bush's 2004 campaign to ensure four more years of pain for the United States for his political gain.
  •