I can understand the frustration. Some states simply punch the DL as invalid and give it back and you get a new one about a week later. But I don't understand if the SSA requires the surgeon's letter of SRS/GRS, what's the confusion?
Yes, I agree there should be ways to allow the gender change with less, such as court judgement, forms signed by therapists/physicians, or something to assure the SSA your gender change is sufficiently permanent (some folks do change back later), but until then it's what they require.
It is the regulations and asking them to change it without it puts them at risk. Remember their name will be in the record and file, and an audit could easily come back to them and their job. Let's sit in their chair and at their desk before we ask them to bend the rules "just for us." What about them?
Yes, it's a binary rule based one criteria, but to date I haven't seen the agreement which allows the change everyone can accept, not just transpeople or the transcommunity, but the government and society. After, people do have expectations of sex and gender and the transcommunity seems to forget it's about everyone and not just us.
After all, do we want society to say it's ok for women to have male gentalia? And if they expect women to have vagina, genetic or surgical, what alternatives can we provide to convince them otherwise?
Just a thought, but not necessarily my view.