Quote from: Mister on April 22, 2009, 06:24:14 PM
This is probably one of the least respectful posts I've seen on this forum. Fetishizing transpeople is not ok. Ever. FTMs are not some special breed of human, they are men. Treat them otherwise and they will very justifiably lash out at you. Please, please learn some basic respect.
I can understand the instant reaction portions of this. As Hypatia said lots of us would rather be "loved for who I am, not for what I was or where I came from."
But, the fact is human attraction can be a wild and wooly beast, but usually isn't. We find people who do tend to fit certain "types" tall, short, attitudinally this or that sort, hairy, hairless, broad, narrow, blonde, brunette, large-breasted, tiny-breasted, wide-hipped, narrow-hipped, etc etc etc. Does that make for a fetish? Or does it mean that someone finds certain aspects are likelier to catch their eyes and interests than others?
Almost none of us are ever appreciated for "who we are" to begin with in a relationship. Initial attractions seldom are for those aspects of us we find unique to ourselves. Instead they are attractions to "types." The association of positive aspects of behavior or looks to an FTM isn't fetishizing the person, I think. It's associating a particular attractive aspect with a group of people.
Yep, it definitely loses that individual quality at that point, but it doesn't make a fetish either. It generalizes, in this case a positive, to an entire group. Obviously such generalizations seldom come anywhere close to being true 75% of the time.
My guess is that after the inital attraction then, if the relationship can be nurtured further, the interests and attractions become specific to a particular individual.
I really didn't see anything offensive in the opening post, just something quite rudimentary: associating one's wants with what she found attractive before. That is a rather usual human behavior.
Nichole