I'm glad someone was covering it but I don't know if Autumn was the right person for that. There's something about her reporting that seems a little too self-indulgent to me. I saw just one example last night when reviewing the Twitter archives for the trial from the Greeley Tribune:
# comment -- This is Autumn Sandeen, a trans woman. Am I deceptive when I go to the grocery store and don't out myself? AUGH! #zapataabout 8 hours ago from web .
Does it really matter what happens to Autumn Sandeen at a grocery store and is that relevant to the trial? Is it necessary? Not many comparisons between Autumn's need for disclosure and Angie's, they are quite different. And then to post that IN THE TWITTER blog on
justiceforangie.com? A little too self-serving for me.
The DA said :"DA Miller: Not deception -- "Is she supposed to where a sign that she's transgender?" #zapata""
I believe Autumn was seeing herself and how her life related to that comment but she completely misses the point. The key point in the trial is disclosure and Autumn's need for disclosure is much different and serves no purpose being anywhere near this murder trial where the nation is watching and judging us. Just my thoughts, Meghan