I've modified Rustin's highlighted words in my own mind. What I believe Bayard Rustin would say now is something more to the effect of:
She has as much right to modify Bayard Rustin's words as I would to change Churchill or Chuck Norris would to change Gandhi. And, at that, I'm not sure that Bayard Rustin is exactly the kind of person we would want as a paragon of virtue in the movement.
Add to that this cute idea: So, I believe we're in a gray area. Although the speech wasn't laced with profanity, I honestly believe it was deeply profane (though, like a lot of other big words she uses, it does not mean exactly what she thinks it means). Setting ones self up as some sort of judge, "can't describe it, but I know it when I hear it" is very scary in a democratic society.
Don't like it? Don't listen. That kills not just the show, it kills the station.
