Susan's Place Logo

News:

Since its founding in 1995 Susan's Place forums have blossomed into a truly global lifeline. To date we've delivered roughly 1.4 billion page views to hundreds of millions of unique visitors, guided more than 41,000 registered members through 1,985,081 posts and 188,474 topics across 193 boards, and—most importantly—helped save tens of thousands of lives by connecting people to vital information and support at their most vulnerable moments.

Main Menu

Sexist Comments of the Week: Transgender Shoplift Edition

Started by Shana A, October 27, 2009, 08:24:41 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Shana A

Sexist Comments of the Week: Transgender Shoplift Edition

Posted by Amanda Hess on Oct. 26, 2009, at 9:00 am

http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/blogs/sexist/2009/10/26/sexist-comments-of-the-week-transgender-shoplift-edition/

Last week, two stories on the Washington Post's gender treatment for a couple of transgender shoplifting suspects (Washington Post Cross-Dressing Shoplifting Story Misfires; Transgender Shoplifting Story's Absurd Corrections) inspired confusion, transphobia, and some helpful commentary!

The story: A couple of transgender women are caught shoplifting, and end up being shot by police after a botched getaway. In a medical examination, the suspects are revealed to have male genitalia. So: The Post first reported that the suspects were women, then reported that they were cross-dressing men, and finally issued a vague clarification that the suspects were still men dressed as women, but "were not in disguise." Was the Post's treatment insensitive? Incorrect? Or the lone crusader for truth in a PC world?
"Be yourself; everyone else is already taken." Oscar Wilde


  •