Ok, so I have had four sessions now with a therapist, and they started off well enough (as they generally seem to, since a lot of the initial meetings is relief at getting stuff off your chest, and simply having a sympathetic, non-judgmental ear). But now I am stopping sessions, with this therapist at any rate. It's not that I don't like her as a person, she's fine, or that she is unfriendly, she's not, but rather I find I am honestly frustrated with this system that seems to have been constructed to "deal" with transgendered people - or at least, her interpretation of it. Let me try to explain what I mean.
I am 42 years old, and I've had these feelings of wanting to be a girl since I was a small child. I am a software developer, with a
B.Sc. in computer science from one of the better universities over in the UK. I'm fairly intelligent and self aware, and I think I have a pretty good handle on self introspection and exploring my feelings about this whole gender thing. I've looked at it in some depth, in fact, over a period of decades, and one of the things I was hoping to find out once and for all during this therapy was whether my feelings of gender dysphoria were based on a sexual fetish related to transvestitism, or if there really was a deeper transsexual thing going on which would make transition a good choice for me.
The therapist encouraged me to investigate these feelings, and to try to tease out what I was feeling when I masturbated while dressed (for example). I did this, and in the last couple of weeks had a rather unexpected bonus from my brief stint trying out Propecia: My sex drive became severely reduced, to the point where I am finding it currently very difficult to even masturbate to climax - the libido just isn't there, or it isn't very strong. However the desire to be female remained, strong as ever. This told me something.
I have also, incidentally, been doing more introspection about the whole concept of dressing up as a woman, and the more analysis I do of this, the more I believe that there are separate facets here - at least three, being raw libido (as a result of having gonads), desire to dress (being obviously fetishistic at least in part), and gender dysphoria (desire to be completely female, in all respects, including surgery). I have been thinking about the whole dressing thing, and something struck me as I was driving in town the other day - I saw a girl walking her dog, and she was dressed completely nondescript, nothing particularly feminine, just long pants and top, but it was completely obvious from her body shape that this was a female. It struck me because she wasn't wearing "women's clothing", and yet was unquestionably a woman. It really began to bug me that dressing in women's clothing is a bit of a crutch (to me anyway), an incomplete facade which only gives an image of, an illusion of, being female. It's not the essence of the femininity. In fact, one of the reasons it becomes so frustrating to me, and feeling like a dead end, is that it's not real.
As a programmer, I like designing elegant systems, which are well designed from the inside and out. Dressing like a woman, while being a man, just feels like a hack. It's not a true thing, it's an illusion. So it's very unfulfilling to the part of me that wants to be a woman, complete in body and mind.
The thing is, I'm still not absolutely 100% sure in my mind that transition is the right thing for me. I know the desire is there, and I know that it's not purely sexual in nature, now. But I also know that I have both male and female aspects; I could, if I really tried, live out the rest of my days as a man. The question is, could I be happier doing it as a woman? This is a grand question, a grand experiment as well, because for me it really isn't a question of "do or die", as it seems to be for some more extreme cases. I seem to fall somewhere in the middle. As to whether this should necessarily disqualify me from making a choice to be a woman, rather than feeling compelled to be one beyond any question, is rather interesting. I think the intolerance of society has taught us to try to portray the gender issue as being one that is not a lifestyle choice, but at the risk of offending some - why shouldn't there be an element of choice for some who happen to fall in the middle? If there is a spectrum, then inevitably there will be some who fall at a point where they could honestly go one way or the other, and survive in either role (though perhaps thriving more in one or the other). Does that make their quest any less valid than the rock-solid girly girl transsexual who is 100% sure?
I look at the gender roles as being something like putting on a different sweater - it's a role we play, a thing we portray. For most people it's a natural thing that we developed (and were taught) at a very young age. To revisit it later in life is not only interesting, but jarring too - not only for us, but also for those around us. But we have to remember that at it's essence, the gender split is about roles. I don't see why we shouldn't be able to choose to play a different role if we want to. I just don't see the big deal with that, but I know I'm in a small minority there.
My previous experience with Improvisational theatre taught me that you can't go into new situations knowing what will happen in advance, you just need to observe, relate and react to the other people around you, and go from there. Whenever you go up on stage with a big plot in mind, it's just too inflexible, you make decisions not based on the other people but rather on what will move your Big Plot forward. This gets boring very quickly, for everybody - who cares if you want to rob the bank or take over the town? But the instant you just live in the moment and react to what's going on, and go with the suggestions (maybe only body language) that the other players put out there, then interesting things start to happen.
My current desire is to try taking hormones, to see if the gradual changes that start to occur seem to agree with me, feel right, or if they make me feel more and more uncomfortable, in which case obviously I would stop or rethink the regimen. The idea here is that unlike surgery, the effect of hormones is not irreversible (at least at first), and if you are already a bit transgendered (which I know I am) then I'm sure I could deal with whatever semi- or permanent changes did occur.
Now I think this is some interesting stuff, but I was running into a kind of brick wall with the therapist. Her approach was that I am doing this backward - in fact first of all I should be exploring every possible aspect of what I think would happen if I were to transition to being a woman - how would I relate to the world, how would I relate to other people, how would I react to the loss of status in going from a male role to a female role, how would I deal with the increased danger in living either as openly transgendered or as a woman, etc.
I found her questions more and more frustrating, because it just seems like I am being made to jump through hoops, say certain things, think in a certain way, display certain behaviors and make certain conclusions, in order to progress through whatever process it is that she has laid out in her head. When I brought up the idea of trying out hormones, she thought this was backward, and she outright refused to write me a letter for that based on our discussions so far, because she thinks it's just premature, and I (in her words) "refuse to explore" the realities of what transition would entail for me.
Our session became a little bit contentious after that point. I was coming to realize that we were no longer on the same page at all, she had a certain picture of how this "therapy" is supposed to progress, whereas I see myself as being in control of my life, and just wanting someone qualified to help me figure out some of the more interesting aspects of the issues at hand. I can appreciate of course the thing about exploring, but it all just seems too inflexible and contrived, ignoring where I feel I am and where I want to go. I get the feeling that everywhere, trans people are forced, implicitly and explicitly, to fit themselves into boxes and say certain things and display certain behaviors simply in order to progress through this system that has been imposed upon them.
She said she thought I was, ironically, exhibiting very "male" thinking by wanting to exert my own desires so strongly, and I in turn felt that this was, ironically, a very stereotypical characterization of how a "male" vs "female" would behave. Some of the strongest minded people I've ever met have been female - they know what they want, and they don't stop until they get it, does that make them males? I don't think so. In fact, any particular attribute you care to choose can be seen every day being expressed by both men and women everywhere. As to who or how I would be in my future role as "woman", who can say? I have no idea, but since I am ok with this, she said I was being "flippant" and thus refusing to explore. Whatever.
Now I can fully understand that there is a need to eliminate real mental disorders before committing to something as radical as transition or surgery. But I am just feeling that I am being pressured, in order to progress along the path that I want for myself, to behave in a certain way that is not useful to me. It feels like play acting, not going toward the truth. How can I know what it would be like for me to relate to the world completely as a woman? It's impossible to say, just like it's impossible to say what will happen when you get up on the stage and start improvising. And I'm fine with that, it's part of growing up and just evolving, flying by the seat of your pants. I don't think I have any big underlying mental health issues that I'm avoiding, this isn't about suppression of hidden desires or whatever - in addressing this gender dysphoria I believe I'm about ten million miles beyond 99% of the population in terms of looking candidly at my "inner demons", such as they are (or aren't). But the therapist thought all this talk of flying by the seat of my pants just means that I'm "refusing to explore", and as a result I feel we came to an impasse. What did she want me to do, imagine scenarios where I'm dressed as a woman and I have to use the bathroom? She said I was being defensive, and the discussion just went downhill from there.
I don't know what the outcome of all this will be, but I do know that rather than increasing my insight into my condition, all this therapy is doing is causing me frustration and irritation, while emptying my wallet to the tune of $80 a pop. Nothing much seems to happen during these sessions for the money it's costing me, to be honest, and I really kind of resent feeling compelled to subject myself to this stuff just because some people somewhere decided that this is how it has to be done. This is my life, why can't I just live it in the way I want to, without feeling like I have to get the approval of some system that has a bunch of checkboxes to define whether you fit the criteria?
She told me outright that she wasn't going to give me any letter, and that moreover I didn't really need any letter to go to a physician and ask for hormones. So I'll go to Lyon Martin and see what they say - not demanding anything, but rather just explaining (as far as possible in the timeslot I'm allowed) what I'm about, where I am, and what I'm thinking about. As with all Improv, I'll just play it by ear.
Does this resonate with anybody? Am I being too, I don't know, judgmental about this system? I just honestly feel a bit resentful that I am being told that I need to do certain things and check off certain boxes before I am "allowed" to do something with my own body. It just doesn't sit right with me, sorry.
Thanks for reading,
Meow