Strangely, Jenny, that also happened in my constituiency. Until 1992, this was a pretty much Tory stronghold. Since then it has been held by the Liberals. Labour barely keep their deposit.
The general opinion is that people personally like our Liberal MP and anything is better than having the Torys back.
As I was trying to point out to kat, no system is perfect, or near it. Any system is only going to be as good as those that use it.
The Westminster system has been implimented in a number of other states, including Israel!!
But take, for example, two African states, Zimbabwe and Mauritius. Both with, essentially, identical governmental systems.
Mauritius is a tiny island, 5000 or so miles away from Africa. It has few resources. Yet its government is generally very stable. It's economy is remarkably successful and there are well educated Mauritians living in most parts of the world.
Zimbabwe has enormous resources of almost every kind. It once produced more food than any other state. It is potentially the wealthiest. Yet because one man has refused to accept the limitations of his office, the place is in ruins.
The strength of any system, including the US, is the willingness of those in power to accept their limitations.
The problem for Zimbabwe is that the president refuses to accept that his role is a figurehead as the president of Mauritius does.
Mugabie can command enormous support from huge numbers of young men who are only too willing to form themselves into lawless gangs. The results are patient.
The president of Mauritius could quite easily summon a similar mob. (By convention, the president is a Muslim, muslims make up about 15% of the population. The Prime Minister is a Hindu, though occasionally a Christian. Hindus make up over 50% of the population while Christians make up about 30%)
Having that amount of power and using it are two entirely different things.
The instabilities in the US become apparent when we look at the numerous periods where the bulk of the populace has become encouraged to become unnecessarily fearful of invasion.
Here in Europe, and especially in the British Isles, such generalised mob rule is rare. The last time it happened here was the 17th century. Our bigget problem is our apathy. We fail to see psychopaths until the damage has already been done. This is certainly the case with Tony Blair.