Quote from: Adio on May 05, 2010, 11:30:04 AM
It's the old nature versus nurture argument. I believe in nature and nurture.
I think nurture is nature, as in we are subject to conditioning because of our nature. We are built to change and adapt to our environment to maximize survival and reproduction.
Gender identity reminds me a lot of homosexuality in this sense. It should technically be un-beneficial that gay people (and other animals) don't breed and yet it has always existed. In various cultures there have always been transgendered people. Why? The whole idea of genetics/natural-selection is that there must be some benefit or it would have been eliminated. I mention this because if you assume being trans-gender is a mechanism for some unknown purpose in evolution it really does make sense as a function; that if someones propensity is to act more like the opposite gender naturally then we of course would feel drawn to assimilate with them, and become that gender.
I know I can sometimes dismiss my gender issues too much by focusing on the problem of gender as a social construct. "Am I a really so petty that I'd f--k up my body so I can wear trousers and sit with my legs open?" but that's over simplifying. if women acted like men do, would we happily be women? I'm not so sure.
i know tom boys and butch lesbians who wouldn't want to be a man, but have masculine qualities. and of course the converse of feminine men. so we know that femininity and masculinity are not fixed by sex, because they have those mannerisms themselves. whats the difference between me and an extremely masculine lesbian who's happy as she is? that drive.
I think what is in us, is a genuine need to be the OTHER gender, not to be a collection of idiosyncrasies, and that desire subconsciously allows us to absorb some of those mannerisms automatically. think of body language just in general? we didn't sit in a classroom and learn it consciously. we just absorbed it via socialization.
the desire to be male is the end point, the mannerism is the means. humans are complicated with a lot of greyness, but ultimately if you obsess on that, on the means and not the point, you are bound to question what the hell is true. i think we assimilated from society aspects of the opposite gender role that we, for some reason, inherently gravitated towards. The hormones or surgery, the behaviors; they are only to help us be accepted as the gender we naturally feel we are. These things are the means, and that is why they are optional, yet for many, necessary to feel recognized as what they "already are".