Susan's Place Logo

News:

Based on internal web log processing I show 3,417,511 Users made 5,324,115 Visits Accounting for 199,729,420 pageviews and 8.954.49 TB of data transfer for 2017, all on a little over $2,000 per month.

Help support this website by Donating or Subscribing! (Updated)

Main Menu

An Unexpected Reverse

Started by Shana A, October 06, 2010, 08:47:46 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Shana A

Wednesday, 6 October 2010
An Unexpected Reverse
Zoe Brain

http://aebrain.blogspot.com/2010/10/unexpected-reverse.html

Here's a letter I've just written to the Federal Member for Fraser. Similar letters have gone to both ACT Senators, and the Attorney-General.

    From:
    Zoe E Brain
 
    6 October 2010

    Dear Mr Leigh

    May I draw your attention to section 62 of the SEX DISCRIMINATION AMENDMENT BILL 2010

        62 After subsection 40(4)
        1
        Insert:
        2
        (5) Nothing in Division 2 renders it unlawful to refuse to make, issue
        3
        or alter an official record of a person's sex if a law of a State or
        4
        Territory requires the refusal because the person is married.

    The above section is directly contrary to the recommendations of the Australian Human Rights Commission. It also enshrines for the first time in Federal Law the concept that someone's sex depends on their marital status, as opposed to their marital status depending on their sex.
"Be yourself; everyone else is already taken." Oscar Wilde


  •