Quote from: Devlyn on October 07, 2018, 04:05:46 AM
We're watching Deathstar Galactica this morning...<running away>
XD XD XD
This is such a hot button topic. Honestly, I think they are, and were trying to be, very different things, Star Wars and Star Trek.
I enjoy Star Wars, yet I actually always had a hard time taking Star Wars seriously, as it had an immaculate lack of any empirical science or backstory cohesiveness at all. We know virtually very little other than a classic story of a tyrannical regime being fought by a resistance, with a few different key players, just on a galactic scale.
Weapons, walker's, fighter's, etc designs are ridiculous in Star Wars, and are competely and utterly tactically devoid of reason, making the entire scenario highly unrealistic. Transportation vehicles of all kinds seem like something people in the 1800's would think of, not in the 20th century. Also how most species and groups beyond jedi and central storyline races seem, and are painted as completely stupid, etc, I could go on for quite a long time. I just can't take it seriously.
Star Wars, much like the original Star Trek series, to me, is like an older James bond movie (when people were still allowed to actually have fun watching one and the writing wasn't dry as 3 million year old terd sitting in death valley) It was meant to be fun, a thrill-ride, a nice adventure that inspired the imagination, yet usually sexist or in some way ethically flawed, and its creativity was only in show, rather than substance.
Does it make for a great series to watch and eat snacks? Certainly! Does it cary pleasant nostalgia for some people? I'm certain it does.
Would I ever rewatch any of them like I do with Star Trek? No, because I don't see anything there worth gleaning again.