I think I love the World Health Organization (branch of United Nations). They put it very simply:
"Sex" refers to the biological and physiological characteristics that define men and women. "Gender" refers to the socially constructed roles, behaviours, activities, and attributes that a given society considers appropriate for men and
women.To put it another way: "Male" and "female" are sex categories, while "masculine" and "feminine" are gender categories.
Here in Genderland, we like to assert that gender is fluid. Gender is how we express our individuality with the paintbrushes called masculine and feminine (or androgyn). We eschew the "gender binary" in favor of freedom of expression. Why then, do we hang on to a term like cisgender?
If I try to imagine myself, for instance, as being cisgender, images of the "real woman" try to find their way into my psyche. What the hell? Is there any such thing? "Cis" meaning "on the same side as" supports the whole concept of binary – that is, two-sidedness. If I am "on the same side'" of my assigned sex, I am cissexual; I get that. If I am "on the same side" of my gender, which is commonly referred to as feminine, then where is there any room for the masculine qualities of my personality? And how many females do you know who do not have any masculine qualities? For instance.
I know the term cisgender is popular. I believe people use it (erroneously) in place of the term cissexual. I propose that the casual substitution of one term for the other is working against us. Gender, not to be confused with sex, is fluid. When we say cisgender instead of cissexual, we are actually supporting the idea of a binary.
Does this argument make sense to anyone else? If it doesn't make sense, can you tell me what you think cisgender means? Can you give me an example of a cisgendered person?