Susan's Place Logo

News:

Since its founding in 1995 Susan's Place forums have blossomed into a truly global lifeline. To date we've delivered roughly 1.4 billion page views to hundreds of millions of unique visitors, guided more than 41,000 registered members through 1,985,081 posts and 188,474 topics across 193 boards, and—most importantly—helped save tens of thousands of lives by connecting people to vital information and support at their most vulnerable moments.

Main Menu

On the Terminology of Transsexuality

Started by Natasha, April 29, 2011, 05:41:35 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Natasha

On the Terminology of Transsexuality

http://everquestingmind.wordpress.com/2011/04/29/on-the-terminology-of-transsexuality/
4/29/11
By Lorelei

While trawling Youtube the other day I happened across a video by a crossdresser about all the different 'labels' we apply to ourselves, and how essentially redundant they all are.

So on thinking further I realise I am slipping away from 'transsexual' as a specific epithet for myself. It is such a loose term. Allow me to explain.

If you break the word down, you have the components 'trans' and 'sexual'. Here we hit our first stumble. 'Sexual', being the word pertaining to 'sex', has two meanings: Genital intercourse, and the word describing the genitals themselves. In the Hollywood and advertising culture we now live, most people automatically think of the former definition, the use of the word 'sex' as a verb.

This creates a problem for the transsexual, because it is then widely assumed that the primary motive is based on intercourse (particularly the notion that a transsexual woman is really a gay predator attempting to deceive men into sleeping with them). That aside, it is the second definition I want to discuss.
  •