Susan's Place Transgender Resources

News and Events => Political and Legal News => Topic started by: SandraJane on August 18, 2011, 04:49:39 PM

Title: Recent Ruling Supports Inmate’s Sex-Change Claim
Post by: SandraJane on August 18, 2011, 04:49:39 PM
Recent Ruling Supports Inmate's Sex-Change Claim

By Winston Gieseke   Posted on Advocate.com August 18, 2011 02:00:00 PM ET

Michelle Kosilek x390 (DIRECTORY OF BOSTON.COM fair use) | Advocate.com

http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2011/08/18/Recent_Ruling_Supports_Inmates_Sex_Change_Claim/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+AdvocatecomDailyNews+%28Advocate.com+Daily+News%29 (http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2011/08/18/Recent_Ruling_Supports_Inmates_Sex_Change_Claim/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+AdvocatecomDailyNews+%28Advocate.com+Daily+News%29)

Does a convicted murderer have a legal right to a taxpayer-funded sex-change operation? A recent appeals court ruling suggests the answer might be yes.
Title: Re: Recent Ruling Supports Inmate’s Sex-Change Claim
Post by: Epi on August 18, 2011, 07:38:54 PM
"According to court papers filed by Kosilek's lawyers, the convicted murderer suffers from terrible stress and anxiety while she waits for a resolution of this case.'"

I wonder what their wife felt when they murdered her or what her family was left feeling after this person murdered their daughter?




I just see the $$$ adding up... to me all this means is social services for law-abiding citizens will be cut in order to supplement a criminal.  On a sarcastic note, I wonder if he's bankrupt and needs a federal bail-out?  I hear they're just giving those out to crooks and scumbags.

Title: Re: Recent Ruling Supports Inmate’s Sex-Change Claim
Post by: wendy on August 18, 2011, 07:45:29 PM
Hmm actually asked which gender cell mates I would receive.  They told me if I got males I would be raped.  If I got females I would be abused.  Guess I better stay out of jail.

I do not support government funding of anything except military, roads, education and technology.

That means no social security, no unemployment checks, no health care, no food stamps, and a whole lot less government.  We would not be bankrupt!
Title: Re: Recent Ruling Supports Inmate’s Sex-Change Claim
Post by: SandraJane on August 18, 2011, 08:48:35 PM
Ironically, I believe this person is actually an MD, made a fortune doing Laser Hair Removal, was either seperated or in the middle of a divorce when they murdered their wife. Jealousy, found out she was having sex with a construction manager working on their home.
Title: Re: Recent Ruling Supports Inmate’s Sex-Change Claim
Post by: wendy on August 18, 2011, 08:56:55 PM
Quote from: SandraJane on August 18, 2011, 08:48:35 PM
Ironically, I believe this person is actually an MD, made a fortune doing Laser Hair Removal, was either seperated or in the middle of a divorce when they murdered their wife. Jealousy, found out she was having sex with a construction manager working on their home.

No problem.  Do a free laser penis removal.  Burn thing off and then put her in female prison.  Think those big girls will accept her?  Think again.  Not big fan of spousal murder.
Title: Re: Recent Ruling Supports Inmate’s Sex-Change Claim
Post by: Lily on August 18, 2011, 10:04:36 PM
I think it should be allowed, not for the sake of this guilty person, but for the sake of those wrongly accused. Would you want to have to stop your transition because you happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time?

And trans people should have their own prisons. I can't think of much worse for myself than being stuck in a men's prison.
Title: Re: Recent Ruling Supports Inmate’s Sex-Change Claim
Post by: Ann Onymous on August 19, 2011, 08:12:16 AM
Quote from: Lily on August 18, 2011, 10:04:36 PM
And trans people should have their own prisons. I can't think of much worse for myself than being stuck in a men's prison.

There are nowhere near enough to justify the expense of building AND staffing a completely separate facility, not to mention the extremely horrible precedent it would set as pertains to separate but equal.  Prisons are costly...I remember the figures when we had the expansion between roughly 1987 and 1994 that took us from 35K beds to more than 150K beds...

The reality is that, even in the large States, you don't have hundreds and hundreds of people who entered prison as either pre-operative or post-operative transsexuals.  And it has been shown on more than one occasion that pre-ops can safely be housed in the safekeeping custodies that are used with gay inmates (which is a general population housing status, not the 23-hour AdSeg or solitary confinement that some continue to perpetuate the myth of). 

My god, Texas even had a policy on the books in the late '80s that addressed continuity of care for persons entering custody who had been on medically managed hormonal treatment for transsexuality.   
Title: Re: Recent Ruling Supports Inmate’s Sex-Change Claim
Post by: Korlee on August 19, 2011, 11:13:36 AM
Quote from: Lily on August 18, 2011, 10:04:36 PM
I think it should be allowed, not for the sake of this guilty person, but for the sake of those wrongly accused. Would you want to have to stop your transition because you happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time?

And trans people should have their own prisons. I can't think of much worse for myself than being stuck in a men's prison.

I'm sorry but that train of thought is why the justice system blows so hardcore right now.  Since people like you think that because there is a chance of the -wrongly accused- we should reward the MILLIONS of convicted felons that deserve to rot in hell for it.  That train of thought with the bleeding hearts causes so many stinking problems that there are no words.

That person voided their rights the moment they became a selfish lil prick that decided only what they wanted mattered.  They shouldn't get healthcare, decent food, cable options, nothing.  They should have bars and concrete that's it!
Title: Re: Recent Ruling Supports Inmate’s Sex-Change Claim
Post by: Sage on August 19, 2011, 11:21:28 AM
Quote from: Korlee on August 19, 2011, 11:13:36 AM
I'm sorry but that train of thought is why the justice system blows so hardcore right now.  Since people like you think that because there is a chance of the -wrongly accused- we should reward the MILLIONS of convicted felons that deserve to rot in hell for it.  That train of thought with the bleeding hearts causes so many stinking problems that there are no words.

That person voided their rights the moment they became a selfish lil prick that decided only what they wanted mattered.  They shouldn't get healthcare, decent food, cable options, nothing.  They should have bars and concrete that's it!
The day that people showed more pity and sympathy for a serial rapist than the twelve year old girl he raped and butchered....that was the day I lost faith in humanity and justice.   :(
Title: Re: Recent Ruling Supports Inmate’s Sex-Change Claim
Post by: Sarah Louise on August 19, 2011, 12:05:33 PM
So if this becomes law, then the easiest way to surgery is get convicted of a crime and force the state to pay for your surgery.

Geez.
Title: Re: Recent Ruling Supports Inmate’s Sex-Change Claim
Post by: wendy on August 19, 2011, 12:11:39 PM
Quote from: Sarah Louise on August 19, 2011, 12:05:33 PM
So if this becomes law, then the easiest way to surgery is get convicted of a crime and force the state to pay for your surgery.

Geez.

Can I get a six month sentence for petty crime, get surgery and come out after I heal from good behavior and then spend money I stole that gave me six month sentence?  Yes another best selling book, "How I spend America's money before America went bankrupt".
Title: Re: Recent Ruling Supports Inmate’s Sex-Change Claim
Post by: Amazon D on August 19, 2011, 12:16:23 PM
Quote from: wendy on August 18, 2011, 07:45:29 PM
Hmm actually asked which gender cell mates I would receive.  They told me if I got males I would be raped.  If I got females I would be abused.  Guess I better stay out of jail.

I do not support government funding of anything except military, roads, education and technology.

That means no social security, no unemployment checks, no health care, no food stamps, and a whole lot less government.  We would not be bankrupt!

people pay into social security and for unemployment and for health care and taxes to support people who need food. your crazy to think that we should go back to pre social security days.. you think its tough now wait til no one has any help or payback from the work they do.. also imagine all the people who are disabled! They need to survive and not be left to begging on the streets..  Oh your probably one of those conservatives who only cares for themselves..  :o

Yes the convicted person in jail doesn't deserve to get anything more than a hot and a cot and they should all be made to work too. Bring back the chain gangs would be great. Cleaning up roads etc as they do still in many states
Title: Re: Recent Ruling Supports Inmate’s Sex-Change Claim
Post by: wendy on August 19, 2011, 01:21:55 PM
Quote from: M2MtF2FtM on August 19, 2011, 12:16:23 PM
people pay into social security and for unemployment and for health care and taxes to support people who need food. your crazy to think that we should go back to pre social security days.. you think its tough now wait til no one has any help or payback from the work they do.. also imagine all the people who are disabled! They need to survive and not be left to begging on the streets..  Oh your probably one of those conservatives who only cares for themselves..  :o

Social Security Fund is a receipt system that pays its money out for whatever government wants and government gives itself an IOU.  It should be called Social Security Welfare system.  When it was founded it was initially not popular.  Now it has trouble collecting enough money to "make payroll".

We pay for medicare but not health care with taxes.  What a mess medicare is.  That will continue to get more expensive.

I better stay healthy with Obama care.  Think U.S. government can manage healthcare?  You have not seen taxes.

United States Government is facing bankrupcy.  It debt rating was lowered because its ability to repay is deteriorating.

When U.S. government collapses we will have double unemployment and food prices will increase and homes will lose value. 

Founding fathers wanted government to provide military, roads and some basic services.  They actually thought duties should pay for expenses to manage federal government.

Do you think raising taxes on rich will solve fiscal problems?  Rich create jobs and will invest somewhere else like China.  Of course government can create more jobs and be more inefficient.

I believe you volunteer your time and money to help other people.  United States people are most generous in world and that is good. 

It is fine for federal government to help a little for some level of hardship but not for everything.  We can not afford it.  I do feel people's rights should be protected.  I do feel a hard working transgender person should not be fired because they look different.  I don't want a handout I just would like to not get fired because I look different.  That seems reasonable.

Hey I just created a job for me.  I had to pay thousands to a urologist for a Novocaine shot and her surgical skill.  I asked her to slow down so that Novocaine would take hold.  It actually hurt since she cut them off too quickly.  Insurance doesn't pay for transgender issues.  Now for my new job so that I can again join ranks of employed.  I provide Novocaine, knife, and cauterizing iron for all male murderers that want to be females and go to female prison.
Title: Re: Recent Ruling Supports Inmate’s Sex-Change Claim
Post by: Shana A on August 19, 2011, 01:57:43 PM
Quote from: wendy on August 19, 2011, 01:21:55 PM
Do you think raising taxes on rich will solve fiscal problems?  Rich create jobs and will invest somewhere else like China.  Of course government can create more jobs and be more inefficient.

Under the past 10 years of Bush tax cuts, from which the rich greatly benefited, numerous of these jobs were outsourced to India, China, etc.

Z
Title: Re: Recent Ruling Supports Inmate’s Sex-Change Claim
Post by: tekla on August 19, 2011, 02:04:48 PM
That will continue to get more expensive.

And the dirty little not-really-a-secret reason that it gets more and more expensive is that more and more people are living longer and longer.  Now, if that really bothers you, I do have a way that you could contribute to a solution.  Right.  See, no one wants to volunteer to really help change the situation.
Title: Re: Recent Ruling Supports Inmate’s Sex-Change Claim
Post by: Lily on August 19, 2011, 03:30:26 PM
QuoteI'm sorry but that train of thought is why the justice system blows so hardcore right now.  Since people like you think that because there is a chance of the -wrongly accused- we should reward the MILLIONS of convicted felons that deserve to rot in hell for it.  That train of thought with the bleeding hearts causes so many stinking problems that there are no words.

I assume you have never been wrongly convicted of a crime, and have not been beaten/raped by prison guards for it? (not to mention losing your house and job)

You should think of things from their point of view. It is not a pleasant thing.

QuoteThat person voided their rights the moment they became a selfish lil prick that decided only what they wanted mattered.  They shouldn't get healthcare, decent food, cable options, nothing.  They should have bars and concrete that's it!

Are you aware that those who are convicted of a non-violent "crime" (which itself is an absurd concept, but society is absurd and our system reflects that) are, after released, far more likely to commit violence?

American prisons break good people. It is why the repeat offender rate is so much lower in countries like Norway where prisons are humane. If you treat people like animals, they will become animals.

QuoteYes the convicted person in jail doesn't deserve to get anything more than a hot and a cot and they should all be made to work too. Bring back the chain gangs would be great. Cleaning up roads etc as they do still in many states

Prison slavery is wrong because it puts honest people out of work. There are plenty of good unemployed people who would love to pick up trash on the roads. The economy is bad enough as it is.
Title: Re: Recent Ruling Supports Inmate’s Sex-Change Claim
Post by: Ann Onymous on August 19, 2011, 03:46:32 PM
Quote from: Lily on August 19, 2011, 03:30:26 PM
I assume you have never been wrongly convicted of a crime, and have not been beaten/raped by prison guards for it? (not to mention losing your house and job)

You should think of things from their point of view. It is not a pleasant thing.

Having worked with the Innocence Project on more than one DNA-related case, I can assure you that the issues of 'wrongful conviction' are nowhere near as rampant as you make them out to be and I am not even sure I need one finger to count the number of transsexuals who were arrested AND convicted of a charge for which they were factually innocent. 

And the violence you describe is, again, nowhere near as significant an issue as you appear to allege...and I have worked in and around some of what are considered to be the worst facilities in Texas (not to mention have clients in facilities all over the State).  Are there abuses?  Sure.  Are they endemic to the system?  No.

And no, I am not someone who is going to re-think my concepts or expectations of a criminal justice system for the minuscule portion of a population who MIGHT have been wrongfully convicted...

QuoteAre you aware that those who are convicted of a non-violent "crime" (which itself is an absurd concept, but society is absurd and our system reflects that) are, after released, far more likely to commit violence?

Reality does not bear this out.  People are released every day after serving sentences for non-violent offenses who return to society never to be heard from in the criminal justice system ever again. 

Title: Re: Recent Ruling Supports Inmate’s Sex-Change Claim
Post by: regan on August 19, 2011, 03:50:54 PM
Quote from: Ann Onymous on August 19, 2011, 03:46:32 PM
And the violence you describe is, again, nowhere near as significant an issue as you appear to allege...and I have worked in and around some of what are considered to be the worst facilities in Texas (not to mention have clients in facilities all over the State).  Are there abuses?  Sure.  Are they endemic to the system?  No.

I've heard from more then one (reliable) source that what you seen on the average documentary is the inmates showing off for the cameras.  Most of them, actually, just want to do their time and get released.  They certainly don't want to do anything that risks them staying longer then they have to.
Title: Re: Recent Ruling Supports Inmate’s Sex-Change Claim
Post by: wendy on August 19, 2011, 03:52:52 PM
Quote from: Zythyra on August 19, 2011, 01:57:43 PM
Under the past 10 years of Bush tax cuts, from which the rich greatly benefited, numerous of these jobs were outsourced to India, China, etc.

Yes and Obama's jobs are more government jobs and people that no longer qualify for unemployment are not counted in unemployed numbers.

I hope rich become richer because rich people create jobs not poor people.  I do occasionally work for poor people.  I volunteer for Habitat for humanity and help build houses for poor people and my children volunteer too.

Big American companies outsourced jobs to China and India and Mexico.  Most of businesses creating new jobs employ less than 10 people.  Big outsources include AT&T, GE, Equifax and other companies with large labor pools.

Let the entrepreneur keep a few bucks for investing their capital.  That is called capitalism.  However if we raise taxes on rich as Obama wants it will not solve rampant growing government.  Rich frequently pay 30% of their income in taxes.

I have actually heard poor people say why are we not getting tax credits when they owed no taxes.

I am not a Bush fan or an Obama fan as both spend too much.  I am tired of Republican stand on LGBT issues and I am tired of Democrats free spending.  Stop crazy spending and allow people to live their lives.

I am also against death penalty because it costs too much in legal fees to kill someone.  Just toss murderer in cell for rest of their life and hire me to give whoever wants a sex change. 

I got a new idea.  Let's outsource prison system to Saudi Arabia. As long as you are MTF that likes men you can have free SRS but it is against law to like woman if you are a woman in Saudi Arabia.  I do not think woman have many rights in Saudi Arabia.  I think punishment in Saudi Arabia is eye-for-eye.  Let's let Corporate America solve outsourcing details.  I think free SRS for outsourced Saudi prison system is easy sell but I outsoucred my newly created job.
Title: Re: Recent Ruling Supports Inmate’s Sex-Change Claim
Post by: Amazon D on August 19, 2011, 04:00:24 PM

Quote
Yes the convicted person in jail doesn't deserve to get anything more than a hot and a cot and they should all be made to work too. Bring back the chain gangs would be great. Cleaning up roads etc as they do still in many states


Quote from: Lily on August 19, 2011, 03:30:26 PM
Prison slavery is wrong because it puts honest people out of work. There are plenty of good unemployed people who would love to pick up trash on the roads. The economy is bad enough as it is.

cleaning up roads is not slavery. Sitting in prisons doing nothing but eating and staying locked up is more inhumane in my view. Many many yrs ago i did spend some time in jail for a misdemeanor. I had actually asked the judge to lock me up because i had a drug problem. My public defender was shocked.  However, some in there did get to go out and work the roads and that built up a good hard work ethic. It was designed that you had to be good to be allowed to go to work. Thats silly everyone should have to go to work for their health let alone their sanity. Chain gangs that abuse, no they are never good and cause people hatred etc.. but forcing any prisoner whether guilty or inocent to work is not wrong at all. Its good for people to work..
Title: Re: Recent Ruling Supports Inmate’s Sex-Change Claim
Post by: Korlee on August 19, 2011, 04:41:30 PM
Quote from: Lily on August 19, 2011, 03:30:26 PM
I assume you have never been wrongly convicted of a crime, and have not been beaten/raped by prison guards for it? (not to mention losing your house and job)

You should think of things from their point of view. It is not a pleasant thing.

Are you aware that those who are convicted of a non-violent "crime" (which itself is an absurd concept, but society is absurd and our system reflects that) are, after released, far more likely to commit violence?

American prisons break good people. It is why the repeat offender rate is so much lower in countries like Norway where prisons are humane. If you treat people like animals, they will become animals.

Prison slavery is wrong because it puts honest people out of work. There are plenty of good unemployed people who would love to pick up trash on the roads. The economy is bad enough as it is.

I've spent my whole life at the brunt of government services as has my father.  So don't you dare speak to me like you know crap about it.  Your counter is nothing more then at best a strawman defense that tries to make the other person feel guilty while backing up none of your claims with evidence or real life experiences.

The abuses of prison guards are actually more inline with getting them cigs for cash, etc.  A corrupt cop is generally more out for money then pointlessly beating prisons while on the cameras littered in most prisons these days.  You get the cigs, go to the bathroom, take prisoner cash left there, exchange cash for cigs, etc.  The BS you are talking about is so far and between there are no words for how retarded it is for you to even bring it up.

The people who put forth the ideas you have put forth usually are the guilty parties or the lawyers there of because they know people will buy into it.  After all if enough buy into it they get sympathy and it is possible then to get away with it or get on parole.  There have been loads of independent studies or groups as noted already that prove you wrong daily.


You know who really breaks the people in prison?  Not the guards, the system, none of that.  It is the other prisoners who side with their gangs, race, etc.  The nasty disgusting people inside that do unthinkable things to each other.  The people who uphold the system are not to blame but those who broke the law already are to blame.



Seriously?  You really believe that?  Even when most highways don't get cleaned or have groups that volunteer for free?  So putting them to work on jobs that NOBODY WANTS TO DO?  Some how makes massive amounts of people unemployed?  Not the gigantic corporations sending jobs away, the government pissing away our taxes, or any of the above?  No.... it is the use of the labor of people who have wronged others... the people the law says should be repaying a debt to society for the harm they caused... instead of draining our wallets like they do now...


So.. is there room under that rock you live under?
Title: Re: Recent Ruling Supports Inmate’s Sex-Change Claim
Post by: Devlyn on August 19, 2011, 05:05:08 PM
You're all off topic and not being solution oriented. We can agree the death penalty would be more appropriate in this case than SRS. Now, I live less than an hour from that prison, and the night before surgery, I intend to break INTO the prison, kill the scumbag, hide the body, and get a good nights sleep before my "renovation." 
Title: Re: Recent Ruling Supports Inmate’s Sex-Change Claim
Post by: Epi on August 19, 2011, 08:24:45 PM
Quote from: Korlee on August 19, 2011, 04:41:30 PM
I've spent my whole life at the brunt of government services as has my father.  So don't you dare speak to me like you know crap about it.  Your counter is nothing more then at best a strawman defense that tries to make the other person feel guilty while backing up none of your claims with evidence or real life experiences.

The abuses of prison guards are actually more inline with getting them cigs for cash, etc.  A corrupt cop is generally more out for money then pointlessly beating prisons while on the cameras littered in most prisons these days.  You get the cigs, go to the bathroom, take prisoner cash left there, exchange cash for cigs, etc.  The BS you are talking about is so far and between there are no words for how retarded it is for you to even bring it up.

Seriously?  You really believe that?  Even when most highways don't get cleaned or have groups that volunteer for free?  So putting them to work on jobs that NOBODY WANTS TO DO?  Some how makes massive amounts of people unemployed?  Not the gigantic corporations sending jobs away, the government pissing away our taxes, or any of the above?  No.... it is the use of the labor of people who have wronged others... the people the law says should be repaying a debt to society for the harm they caused... instead of draining our wallets like they do now...


So.. is there room under that rock you live under?

Yelling at person gets your point across even less.

In most states; where they don't use prison chain gangs still, when you see someone out along the side of the road picking up trash they paid the courts about $35/day to do that instead of staying in county jail.

There is no smoking in prison or jail, despite inmates DO manage to get cigarettes, it's not an item you can obtain from commissary.  Inmates also DO NOT have cash on them as it's not allowed (any visitor who gives an inmate cash is subject to arrest.)  What inmates do have is a jail account which funds can be deposited into that they can use to buy items from commissary.

Police on the streets are more brutal than prison guards as there's no cameras recording their behavior and actions (maybe in Mexico the cops are out for money more; they call it la mordida.)  Also, whenever you have an unruly inmate and have to do a cell extraction or have to restrain them, there is ALWAYS an officer present with a handheld camera recording (for liability purposes) in addition to a nurse being present to check the inmates after they have been placed in a restraint chair.  An officer who uses excessive force while performing their duties will have to face a disciplinary board; while the results usually aren't made public, the inmate or the family of (if it resulted in a wrongful death) have the right to subpoena the DOJ/DOC for that video tape and use it as evidence. 

It's a lot different on the inside, if officers don't show some level of respect to the inmates they best grow eyes in the back of their head or transfer to a desk job.  If anything, prison guards and jailers are also therapists and counselors to these inmates and it's a hell of a job.









I hope this offers some clarity for everyone as how the DOJ and DOC operate their facilities.


Title: Re: Recent Ruling Supports Inmate’s Sex-Change Claim
Post by: Korlee on August 20, 2011, 11:12:33 AM
You act like they care what is allowed and not allowed.  They do smoke all the time in prison and it is as simple as having a single person follow/watch for a guard.  That is a fact not an opinion.  Also they do have cash amongst other things even in the low security prisons.  What is on the list of -allowed- is meaningless considering how easy it is to smuggle things in.  There are even many inmates with cellphones as a rampant problem.

A book about prison rules is only useful for starting a fire when it comes down to inmates following it.  They know the loopholes and abuse them daily.  It isn't hard to do in an American prison at all.
Title: Re: Recent Ruling Supports Inmate’s Sex-Change Claim
Post by: SandraJane on August 20, 2011, 12:50:41 PM
Tweet! Some focus here, back to the article in question... Kosilek's lawyers are trying to use a recent ruling  concerning another Transgendered Inmate that was denied HRT in prison.
Title: Re: Recent Ruling Supports Inmate’s Sex-Change Claim
Post by: Epi on August 20, 2011, 03:12:10 PM
Quote from: Korlee on August 20, 2011, 11:12:33 AM
You act like they care what is allowed and not allowed.  They do smoke all the time in prison and it is as simple as having a single person follow/watch for a guard.  That is a fact not an opinion.  Also they do have cash amongst other things even in the low security prisons.  What is on the list of -allowed- is meaningless considering how easy it is to smuggle things in.  There are even many inmates with cellphones as a rampant problem.

A book about prison rules is only useful for starting a fire when it comes down to inmates following it.  They know the loopholes and abuse them daily.  It isn't hard to do in an American prison at all.

There's about 5% truth in what you see on TV in shows like Lockup: Raw, etc.  I would consider most of the officers shown on those shows not only to be incompetent, but downright negligent in the performance of their duties.

Depending on the facility (if there's a lot of outdoor access) some officers do overlook inmates smoking cigarettes, but for the most part, no, they don't.  You'll face disciplinary action for having cigarettes, prisoners and officers included.  There's some drugs and cash (more drugs than cash) in jails/prisons, but if they don't keep it hidden and moving, it gets confiscated and they lose privileges.  (Dogs can smell the darnedest things.)  It's difficult to hide when you're under the influence of drugs in a correctional facility; if the inmates smart, they get "high" at night when everyone's in their cells.  Maybe in some poor, dilapidated pokey down south inmates freely get away with cellphones, but not in most properly built jails and prisons (the walls are 3-4 feet thick, there's no service getting in OR out, in addition to them installing and using cell phone jammers, real nifty.)

It's also not that easy to smuggle stuff in, if you're getting housed they do a full-strip search, if you're visiting and have any physical contact, the visitor gets thoroughly searched before even being allowed into the visitor room.  If you manage to get a little amount of drugs into the jail through cheeking it, it's usually traded for commissary, not cash.

I would say in facilities (more state run prisons than county jails) that have the highest amount of problems, it's most likely because the officers are using their position to make a profit.  Things on the inside cost a lot more on the outside.  This is just the way it is, but if you have any doubts I recommend you take a tour of your local jail.  They'll tell you the same thing, but I advise you change your attitude when you speak to them, as they won't take kindly to arrogance.






On another note, if Kosilek can afford private counsel, he can pay his own HRT.  If not, I'm sure a prisoner with a little moral integrity than Kosilek (assuming that Kosilek is in general population) will take a disliking to this and deal with it accordingly.
Title: Re: Recent Ruling Supports Inmate’s Sex-Change Claim
Post by: tekla on August 20, 2011, 06:57:30 PM
but I advise you change your attitude when you speak to them, as they won't take kindly to arrogance.

They are not going to take kindly to you so long as your in a uniform, and it's not the one the inmates are wearing.  You're a screw.  Nothing more.
Title: Re: Recent Ruling Supports Inmate’s Sex-Change Claim
Post by: Epi on August 20, 2011, 07:31:51 PM
Quote from: tekla on August 20, 2011, 06:57:30 PM
They are not going to take kindly to you so long as your in a uniform, and it's not the one the inmates are wearing.  You're a screw.  Nothing more.

If you're respectful to inmates, they're respectful to you.  If you treat them poorly, they'll show you no respect.  There are rules everyone has to abide by, officers included.  Just because someone is incarcerated doesn't mean they're incapable of respecting others or not entitled to respect from others.
Title: Re: Recent Ruling Supports Inmate’s Sex-Change Claim
Post by: Keaira on August 20, 2011, 07:41:41 PM
If that murderer gets free SRS it better become law to offer it for us too! That person is in jail as a punishment for their crime, not to stay at a resort and health spa! Frankly I have no faith in the justice system. Cops are not out there to Protect and Serve anymore. they are there to keep the population in order and make money for the Government. :police:
Title: Re: Recent Ruling Supports Inmate’s Sex-Change Claim
Post by: SandraJane on August 20, 2011, 07:56:32 PM
Is this thread now about "Shawshank Screws" or the article?
Title: Re: Recent Ruling Supports Inmate’s Sex-Change Claim
Post by: Shana A on August 20, 2011, 10:55:33 PM
Quote from: SandraJane on August 20, 2011, 07:56:32 PM
Is this thread now about "Shawshank Screws" or the article?

Things have a way of veering pretty far from the original topic around here sometimes! With any luck it will come back though  :laugh:

Z
Title: Re: Recent Ruling Supports Inmate’s Sex-Change Claim
Post by: tekla on August 20, 2011, 11:07:03 PM
Well let me welcome the person to the woman's side of the prison.  And to prove there is no hard feelings, let me, out of my own pocket, put a transcript of the trial in the library so everyone can read it.  How's that?
Title: Re: Recent Ruling Supports Inmate’s Sex-Change Claim
Post by: Korlee on August 21, 2011, 01:30:08 AM
Quote from: Epi on August 20, 2011, 03:12:10 PM
There's about 5% truth in what you see on TV in shows like Lockup: Raw, etc.  I would consider most of the officers shown on those shows not only to be incompetent, but downright negligent in the performance of their duties.

Depending on the facility (if there's a lot of outdoor access) some officers do overlook inmates smoking cigarettes, but for the most part, no, they don't.  You'll face disciplinary action for having cigarettes, prisoners and officers included.  There's some drugs and cash (more drugs than cash) in jails/prisons, but if they don't keep it hidden and moving, it gets confiscated and they lose privileges.  (Dogs can smell the darnedest things.)  It's difficult to hide when you're under the influence of drugs in a correctional facility; if the inmates smart, they get "high" at night when everyone's in their cells.  Maybe in some poor, dilapidated pokey down south inmates freely get away with cellphones, but not in most properly built jails and prisons (the walls are 3-4 feet thick, there's no service getting in OR out, in addition to them installing and using cell phone jammers, real nifty.)

It's also not that easy to smuggle stuff in, if you're getting housed they do a full-strip search, if you're visiting and have any physical contact, the visitor gets thoroughly searched before even being allowed into the visitor room.  If you manage to get a little amount of drugs into the jail through cheeking it, it's usually traded for commissary, not cash.

I would say in facilities (more state run prisons than county jails) that have the highest amount of problems, it's most likely because the officers are using their position to make a profit.  Things on the inside cost a lot more on the outside.  This is just the way it is, but if you have any doubts I recommend you take a tour of your local jail.  They'll tell you the same thing, but I advise you change your attitude when you speak to them, as they won't take kindly to arrogance.






On another note, if Kosilek can afford private counsel, he can pay his own HRT.  If not, I'm sure a prisoner with a little moral integrity than Kosilek (assuming that Kosilek is in general population) will take a disliking to this and deal with it accordingly.

I've had people who were close to me go to jail and arrive back out in both medium, high, and work camps in the state.  These are things they DID!  Not some bs report or TV show.  These are first hand accounts of real people.  Now if you want to poke?  Nearly all city units have a cam on the dash these days to avoid liability issues and your counters read like you watched a documentary then posted the bs from it here.

Real life trumps worthless lil books 'n' shows.
Title: Re: Recent Ruling Supports Inmate’s Sex-Change Claim
Post by: Epi on August 21, 2011, 05:33:57 AM
What I don't understand is if he can afford private counselor, why he can't pay for HRT and SRS himself?  A decent criminal attorney charges $2500 each day they appear in court on your behalf, if he's paying that, he can pay for other things.

$2500/day
$250/hour for paralegal work
.25/mile for travel
all court costs and filing fees

I think he has enough money to treat his entire block to SRS.


Quote from: Korlee on August 21, 2011, 01:30:08 AM
I've had people who were close to me go to jail and arrive back out in both medium, high, and work camps in the state.  These are things they DID!  Not some bs report or TV show.  These are first hand accounts of real people.  Now if you want to poke?  Nearly all city units have a cam on the dash these days to avoid liability issues and your counters read like you watched a documentary then posted the bs from it here.

Real life trumps worthless lil books 'n' shows.

I thought you had "spent your whole life at the brunt of government services" as your father had?  Whatever that means.

It's very common for inmates to play up that "lifestyle" and exaggerate inside and outside of jail.

Dash cams are not in most patrol cars, maybe for a few of the newer units and state patrols in heavy areas, but it's not as common as it used to be.  It costs $$$, departments don't have that.  (Nor the money to pay-out to individuals whose civil rights they have violated.)  The cars that do have them installed are turned on and off at the officers convenience, so not much good for John Q. Public.

Never found any cash, found drugs in small quantities but not that often.  The biggest issue in correctional facilities is gangs and after that it's the county jails inability to put ICE holds on undocumented aliens who have been arrested for misdemeanors.  I'm sure you already knew that though, since your paroled friends tell you everything that goes on inside the DOC.

It's your right to believe whatever and whomever you want, but you could have a little class if you're going to accuse someone of vocalizing what you consider to be propaganda.  You won't learn anything in life if you dismiss everything because you heard otherwise from someone else.  "Now do I want to poke?"  I don't need to poke, I'm quite happy with the reality of things, but it seems you're unable to distinguish between fact and fiction.
Title: Re: Recent Ruling Supports Inmate’s Sex-Change Claim
Post by: Ann Onymous on August 21, 2011, 08:50:29 AM
Quote from: Epi on August 21, 2011, 05:33:57 AM
What I don't understand is if he can afford private counselor, why he can't pay for HRT and SRS himself?  A decent criminal attorney charges $2500 each day they appear in court on your behalf, if he's paying that, he can pay for other things.

$2500/day
$250/hour for paralegal work
.25/mile for travel
all court costs and filing fees

You overestimate what MOST defense attorneys charge.  Almost everyone I know charges flat fee, although there will be an expense retainer against which costs or travel is billed against (and mileage is at roughly 55 cents a mile under current IRS guidelines). 

For the rare instance that we do trial work, we have a flat fee that covers a disposition resulting prior to trial plus an additional sum if the case goes to trial.  Time spent by paralegals is not billed separately. 

The daily and staff clock really comes into play on civil work though...

That being said...I do not disagree with the premise that if one can manage retained counsel, then they have funds to deal with their own medical. 

QuoteIt's very common for inmates to play up that "lifestyle" and exaggerate inside and outside of jail.

Do bad things happen on the other side of the fence?  Sure.  Are they daily occurren.ces?  No.  Is every incident a worst-case scenario?  Not just no, but hell no.  And in that regard, I would concur that a lot of people exagerrate what goes on inside the walls..

Title: Re: Recent Ruling Supports Inmate’s Sex-Change Claim
Post by: Epi on August 21, 2011, 05:25:40 PM
Quote from: Ann Onymous on August 21, 2011, 08:50:29 AM
You overestimate what MOST defense attorneys charge.  Almost everyone I know charges flat fee, although there will be an expense retainer against which costs or travel is billed against (and mileage is at roughly 55 cents a mile under current IRS guidelines). 

For the rare instance that we do trial work, we have a flat fee that covers a disposition resulting prior to trial plus an additional sum if the case goes to trial.  Time spent by paralegals is not billed separately. 

The daily and staff clock really comes into play on civil work though...

That being said...I do not disagree with the premise that if one can manage retained counsel, then they have funds to deal with their own medical. 

Do bad things happen on the other side of the fence?  Sure.  Are they daily occurren.ces?  No.  Is every incident a worst-case scenario?  Not just no, but hell no.  And in that regard, I would concur that a lot of people exagerrate what goes on inside the walls..

Whatever the retainer was years ago when they originally went to trial I'm sure has already been spent.  A flat fee would be for a shut and closed case, got a DUI?  Ah, call so-and-so, they handle them all the time, and only charge a flat fee.  Now, if you were going to take that to court, they'd want a trial retainer and after that was exhausted, they'd want their daily court appearance fee to be paid.  I don't know what law firm you work for but it sounds like there's not that many experienced individuals working there.  Here at the county court level an experienced criminal attorney will cost you, I do think it's a bit high, but you get what you pay for (which is damn good representation.)  The higher the court, the more money the attorney wants to appear.  An attorney isn't going to charge the same amount to appear in federal court that they do for county court and a DMV hearing.  If they did, I wouldn't hire them, all they're going to be able to guarantee you is a large bill and jail time.

This inmate can afford to pay their own SRS and if they can't, they should be using a court appointed attorney.  Being that he's/she's a ward of the government, I don't understand why he/she doesn't raise the suggestion himself/herself that he/she be allowed to transition on his/her own dime and transferred into protective custody.  I can only assume they he/she doesn't want to spend his/her own money because he wants to keep his/her/she's nest-egg intact for when he's released from prison.  Last I recall when you try to take something for your own personal gain by means of intentional deception it was fraud, why should this be any different?  If this inmate isn't happy with the situation they're currently in, maybe they shouldn't have killed their spouse?   

When a child steals candy from a store, we don't reward that child with more candy.  We talk to them, explain that's not right thing to do.  Kosilek is a child who has never been properly disciplined.  It seems to me that Kosilek feels that he's/she's entitled to this.  Well, they're not.  Inmates aren't fed enough, jails are crowded, plenty of individuals with serious medical conditions don't receive adequate care.  Kosilek should be treated as everyone else, put him/her in general population.  I'm sure the other inmates will welcome Kosilek warmly, or not.




Do bad things happen on the other side of the fence?  Yes.  Daily?  Yes, in varying degrees.  Is every incident a worst-case scenario?  No, but you have to plan for that possibility.  If we believed everything inmates said, there wouldn't be any inmates.  "Everyone in jail/prison is innocent."  It's like running a dangerous daycare, where you can't let most of the kids interact with each other.  I just don't let Billy and the other little brats get the upper hand.  10pm is bed-time, they can whine all they want, but I'm turning the lights off.
Title: Re: Recent Ruling Supports Inmate’s Sex-Change Claim
Post by: Ann Onymous on August 22, 2011, 03:58:27 AM
Quote from: Epi on August 21, 2011, 05:25:40 PM
Whatever the retainer was years ago when they originally went to trial I'm sure has already been spent.  A flat fee would be for a shut and closed case, got a DUI?  Ah, call so-and-so, they handle them all the time, and only charge a flat fee.  Now, if you were going to take that to court, they'd want a trial retainer and after that was exhausted, they'd want their daily court appearance fee to be paid.  I don't know what law firm you work for but it sounds like there's not that many experienced individuals working there.  Here at the county court level an experienced criminal attorney will cost you, I do think it's a bit high, but you get what you pay for (which is damn good representation.)  The higher the court, the more money the attorney wants to appear.  An attorney isn't going to charge the same amount to appear in federal court that they do for county court and a DMV hearing.  If they did, I wouldn't hire them, all they're going to be able to guarantee you is a large bill and jail time.

When I say flat fee, I don't mean everyone walking in the door pays the same amount.  I mean we assign a fee of $X K for a particular service.  Most of the work we do is post-conviction and it is usually a $12K minimum entering the door, with some services moving up to a $35-40K minimum.  And we do occasionally quote what DeGuerin once referred to as a 'go away' fee...which some people will pay anyhow.

And you overestimate how quickly the expense account is burned through...for criminal work, you are not billing by the hour.  The fee is often broken down into two flat categories...work up through a trial setting (ie. you pay one amount for disposition vis a vis the plea process and work that moves to a trial setting (ie. the case is docketed for trial and a jury seated to hear evidence and render a verdict).  Appellate work would be another fee entirely in most cases...although we have had a few that we did the appeal at no cost because the trial was so fundamentally flawed. 

The manner in which we bill is consistent with other firms in Houston, Dallas, Austin and other points throughout the State...
Title: Re: Recent Ruling Supports Inmate’s Sex-Change Claim
Post by: Epi on August 22, 2011, 06:02:52 AM
Quote from: Ann Onymous on August 22, 2011, 03:58:27 AM
When I say flat fee, I don't mean everyone walking in the door pays the same amount.  I mean we assign a fee of $X K for a particular service.  Most of the work we do is post-conviction and it is usually a $12K minimum entering the door, with some services moving up to a $35-40K minimum.  And we do occasionally quote what DeGuerin once referred to as a 'go away' fee...which some people will pay anyhow.

And you overestimate how quickly the expense account is burned through...for criminal work, you are not billing by the hour.  The fee is often broken down into two flat categories...work up through a trial setting (ie. you pay one amount for disposition vis a vis the plea process and work that moves to a trial setting (ie. the case is docketed for trial and a jury seated to hear evidence and render a verdict).  Appellate work would be another fee entirely in most cases...although we have had a few that we did the appeal at no cost because the trial was so fundamentally flawed. 

The manner in which we bill is consistent with other firms in Houston, Dallas, Austin and other points throughout the State...

You should move out this way and bring your co-workers, lots of people here would gladly like to not have to pay an arm and leg for representation... me included.
Title: Re: Recent Ruling Supports Inmate’s Sex-Change Claim
Post by: tekla on August 22, 2011, 11:13:58 AM
once referred to as a 'go away' fee...which some people will pay anyhow.

We do something similar, slightly more colorful name, but I'm sure the results are the same, its' the worst.  It sucks from the moment they say 'yes' and you realize that your stuck with it now, and you also know its' going to keep on sucking long after its over.
Title: Re: Recent Ruling Supports Inmate’s Sex-Change Claim
Post by: Keaira on August 29, 2011, 11:56:49 AM
Both of my In-Law's were Guards at the Pendleton Reformatory here in Indiana and I work with another former Guard. I've certainly never heard anything that would suggest it was like a battle-royale in there, or that life is hell. Heck, quite a few prisoners used to tell my Mother-in-law that if a riot broke out,  they would grab her, and put her in a cell. Not as payback, but to protect her from the really bad criminals. And there is a code among prisoners too. Child Molesters are generally seen as the worst scum.
Title: Re: Recent Ruling Supports Inmate’s Sex-Change Claim
Post by: wendy on August 29, 2011, 05:01:13 PM
Quote from: Keaira on August 20, 2011, 07:41:41 PM
If that murderer gets free SRS it better become law to offer it for us too! That person is in jail as a punishment for their crime, not to stay at a resort and health spa! Frankly I have no faith in the justice system. Cops are not out there to Protect and Serve anymore. they are there to keep the population in order and make money for the Government. :police:

Thank you Kearira.   Nothing for my care has been covered.

In fact we are not worth employing because young males will want to be females when they meet us.

I have a friend that is married to a bad woman and it is better to give my friend's children to a bad woman than give children to a TG person!

Ex wife is evil.  She leaves messages on phone "I love you" and tells community that ex has alternate lifestyle as a trans.  Guess what?  Son (11) wants to live with TG dad.  Church, law,  and community supports an evil woman over a good hard working, intelligent dad.  I know because TG dad is my friend!

Oh I got fired from inner city high school math teacher position because I am not male image for students.  Over 50% do not know their father.  I taught Calculus at age 18 to my class.  Over 50% of children do not know their father and I had 5 girls that were pregnant in one semester at 14.  Let's get rid of people that are different even though they are hard working hard, are knowledgeable, and want to help other people.

Are we off topic?  No way!

I do not expect to be accepted by everyone but if I treat someone with respect I do  expect respect.  Do we expect to be cuddled for murder?  I hope not.  However if medications are given to general prison population then appropriate medications should be given to trans people.
Title: Re: Recent Ruling Supports Inmate’s Sex-Change Claim
Post by: Keaira on August 30, 2011, 12:20:45 AM
I'm not entirely heartless and evil. :P

It's just that it irritates me to no end when they do stuff like this. If I went to jail, I'd consider myself very lucky if they gave me my meds. But I wouldnt expect SRS nor demand it. And certainly not on taxpayer money. Next, it will be some woman who killed her husband who wants the taxpayers to pay for a boob job. Or maybe someone wants a nose job. And it snowballs from there.

Also, this I think helps put things in perspective:

QI - US prison population.mov (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8E7wgFcCefE#)