I was told that their releasesing the smaller stp version this week, lets see how well they make this one I just hope it packs right considering its 5'5 inches they have potential though.
5.5 inches is still quite a large package for flaccid (average guy is 3 to 3 1/2 flaccid).
--Jay
Quote from: aleon515 on November 27, 2014, 11:02:10 PM
5.5 inches is still quite a large package for flaccid (average guy is 3 to 3 1/2 flaccid).
--Jay
Its not that bigger than the packer I have know I measured because I was alittle iffy on the size but I mean not everyone has the same size some bigger than others but who knows.
Quote from: aleon515 on November 27, 2014, 11:02:10 PM
5.5 inches is still quite a large package for flaccid (average guy is 3 to 3 1/2 flaccid).
--Jay
Its not just a packer, its a 3 in 1
Yes, it's a difficult problem to get a packer/prosthetic to have two sizes. It can be done, but it's MUCH more expensive!!
--Jay
Quote from: Brandon on November 28, 2014, 09:54:03 AM
Its not just a packer, its a 3 in 1
Quote from: aleon515 on November 28, 2014, 05:12:39 PM
Yes, it's a difficult problem to get a packer/prosthetic to have two sizes. It can be done, but it's MUCH more expensive!!
--Jay
Yea I guess this one is going to have an erection rod though.
Most of the erection rods just serve to make the packer, for lack of a nicer word, "hard" versus also making it longer. It can actually be done, but it isn't something for a under $200 item.
--Jay
Quote from: Brandon on November 29, 2014, 10:50:46 AM
Yea I guess this one is going to have an erection rod though.
Quote from: aleon515 on November 29, 2014, 12:44:29 PM
Most of the erection rods just serve to make the packer, for lack of a nicer word, "hard" versus also making it longer. It can actually be done, but it isn't something for a under $200 item.
--Jay
I know but with the erection rod it might be more packable rather than without. Kinda like peecock.
I'm guessing so. Good luck.
--Jay
Quote from: Brandon on November 29, 2014, 01:15:42 PM
I know but with the erection rod it might be more packable rather than without. Kinda like peecock.
They are sending me one as soon as they release them, I'll let you guys know about it as soon as I receive it.
I just checked their site and it looks like they added a few new models, they look pretty good from the pics.. anyway I emailed them and they said the 5.5 won't actually be out for a few more weeks but did inform me they just released a 3.5 3 n 1 so I'm thinking about getting it.. I'll let you all know how it is when I get it. ;)
I think they may send me one before they release them, so I'll let you all know.
Quote from: erika.s on December 02, 2014, 08:23:44 PM
I just checked their site and it looks like they added a few new models, they look pretty good from the pics.. anyway I emailed them and they said the 5.5 won't actually be out for a few more weeks but did inform me they just released a 3.5 3 n 1 so I'm thinking about getting it.. I'll let you all know how it is when I get it. ;)
They realeased a 3.5 3 in 1?
3.5 inches sounds way short for a 3 in 1. I believe even for an STP a 3.5 is pushing it.
--Jay
Quote from: aleon515 on December 02, 2014, 10:42:22 PM
3.5 inches sounds way short for a 3 in 1. I believe even for an STP a 3.5 is pushing it.
--Jay
Well who knows it might work for both aspects. After all a womans vagina is really not that deep and the g spot is on the upper wall,but man first you were complaning about the 5'5 being to big know your complaing about this bing to small it might just work for some who knows, I might try it because I am not trying to walk around with a snake in my pants when I go to school everyday.
If you look at the cup for peeing it might just work though.
It could work and you are right about both. But I think really that a 3 in 1 is kind of a difficult concept which while I understand doesn't really work that well for all 3. OTOH, it all has to do with how it's made. (I think one that "grows" is the ideal concept, though rather a difficult one there. (Not really "complaining" more commenting. I don't have one to complain about.)
I have a 5" packer, which works though it is at the edge of what I find useful, hence my comments on the 5.5.
--Jay
Quote from: Brandon on December 02, 2014, 10:52:59 PM
Well who knows it might work for both aspects. After all a womans vagina is really not that deep and the g spot is on the upper wall,but man first you were complaning about the 5'5 being to big know your complaing about this bing to small it might just work for some who knows, I might try it because I am not trying to walk around with a snake in my pants when I go to school everyday.
Hey guys, i see the new packers are up at eroticreations, i really like the way the new stps look.. i will be ordering the 5 1/2 stp next week, i'll let y'all know how it is.
Interesting. I am curious to see how the STP function works. As I understand it, the previous model's testicles served as "bridge" but it caused it to be uncomfortable while sitting. From looking at the pictures I am guessing one has to pull the testicles to the body.
They are sending me one to try, should be in the mail in a week or so. I'll keep you posted.
I look forward to the review.
It seems EC put up more pictures and it loos like a cheaper version of Reelmagik. Minus the crazy detail .
Their website has a number of different models not mentioned here even (like extra tiny that is a packer only and super silly huge). :)
--Jay
I noticed. GRRRRR!! A review with pics would make this easier. The struggle to find a good stp/packer is much easier than it was 20+yrs ago but having a clear understanding of the pros and cons of a certain product is still...mind boggling as well as pocket draining. I really want the Stylish Flesh but it would grate my nerves if it did not work for me. :
Hey guys. Here is my review on the new Eroticreations model!
http://nothingwrongwithus.tumblr.com/post/108679261487/review-on-erocticreations-5-5-inch-stp-alright
Great review! Thanks for the info!! I also should be getfing mine any day now..it looks so much better than their first stp attempt..can't wait!
Excellent review and looks like a very nice product.
--Jay
Very nice. When you use it to pee do you have to pull the ball sack into position like the TSW lines?
Quote from: PaperShips on February 15, 2015, 01:39:11 AM
Very nice. When you use it to pee do you have to pull the ball sack into position like the TSW lines?
No, I have the 3.5 inch and I don't have to do that and its really easy to pee out of but your anatomy has to be able to work with it.
Can't you make your own with some casting and some of the synthetic silicones? Design your own and run like you stole it. I would have several sizes.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Silicone is very difficult to work with. It tolerates no mistakes whatsoever. It is also very very expensive, much more than buying several models that don't work for you. But some guys (with a lot of talent, and some perhaps with less) do learn how to work with it. There is no such thing as "synthetic silicone". There is cyberskin and silicone and perhaps some people have used other plastics, but less reliably. Not for me, thank. Of course, it you want a realistic one you need someone to cast from. Sort of a fun little project, as I knwo someone who has done this.
--Jay
Quote from: Vanny on February 15, 2015, 09:54:58 AM
Can't you make your own with some casting and some of the synthetic silicones? Design your own and run like you stole it. I would have several sizes.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quote from: aleon515 on February 15, 2015, 12:12:13 PM
Silicone is very difficult to work with. It tolerates no mistakes whatsoever. It is also very very expensive, much more than buying several models that don't work for you. But some guys (with a lot of talent, and some perhaps with less) do learn how to work with it. There is no such thing as "synthetic silicone". There is cyberskin and silicone and perhaps some people have used other plastics, but less reliably. Not for me, thank. Of course, it you want a realistic one you need someone to cast from. Sort of a fun little project, as I knwo someone who has done this.
--Jay
I can just imagine it now on craigslist. "wanted: male with big penis to make mould of said penis for prosthetics"
Well kind of how you do it. The guy I know advertises in some fetlife groups. :)
--Jay
Quote from: Alexthecat on February 15, 2015, 12:28:13 PM
I can just imagine it now on craigslist. "wanted: male with big penis to make mould of said penis for prosthetics"
Cyberskin is it. And I think with tinkering one can do just fine. Plenty of means and tutorials on YouTube etc. I am a doer. I want I do. Mistakes be damned there is a prosthesis to make and it would be mine.
If you want to give up before you try then we are all barking up the wrong tree, especially here :)
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It's possible to work with cyberskin but keep in mind it is cyberskin may be less than completely safe next to your body. However, if you have the desire to do this than no one is stopping you and might be a little fund raiser, should you become good at it (Otoh, please be a trans guy with a business who can run a good business. Lots of guys who can't unfortunately. )
A somewhat easier step is making tweaking a Mr Limpy. I agree many videos on this one.
Not so many to completely make a cyberskin one from scratch.
Silicone is hundreds or thousands of dollars if you really want to do this. OF course, it's how the guys who are in business are doing this.
Would be interested in seeing your results. :)
--Jay
Quote from: Vanny on February 15, 2015, 01:50:20 PM
Cyberskin is it. And I think with tinkering one can do just fine. Plenty of means and tutorials on YouTube etc. I am a doer. I want I do. Mistakes be damned there is a prosthesis to make and it would be mine.
If you want to give up before you try then we are all barking up the wrong tree, especially here :)
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thanks, I look forward to it.