Look into anatomic ->-bleeped-<-...
This doesn't indicate that I accept Blanchard's ->-bleeped-<- theories but that seems to be what SarahTgirl4ever is describing. Not what is normally accepted as clinical transsexuality.
Transsexualism has three criteria:
- The desire to live and be accepted as a member of the opposite sex, usually accompanied by the wish to make his or her body as congruent as possible with the preferred sex through surgery and hormone treatment;
- The transsexual identity has been present persistently for at least two years;
- The disorder is not a symptom of another mental disorder or a chromosomal abnormality.
While they use the word usually above, I would say it's more like always.
What she describes sounds more like dual-role transvestism...
Dual-role Transvestism has three criteria:
- The individual wears clothes of the opposite sex in order to experience temporary membership in the opposite sex;
- There is no sexual motivation for the cross-dressing;
- The individual has no desire for a permanent change to the opposite sex.
There is absolutely nothing wrong for individuals who crossdress for sexual or non-sexual reasons. Based on what you have chosen to disclose, I would suggest that the latter applies in your case. Just something for you to consider.