So, I was hanging out on tumblr, and I saw this person called s92o21's post about a company named Sinthetics.  Apparenlty, it makes erotic full-sized silicone figures, and just recently came out with a male doll...with detachable "accessories".  I checked the site (not sure if I can post a link here; it's pretty graphic), and the penises look AMAZING.  Right now, they only have "transexual" add-ons for their female dolls, but the ones pictured along with their prototype male doll look very similar.  The add-ons are $250 each, and come in a number of tones (free color samples!), sizes (3-10 inches), hardnesses (flaccid or erect; basic or advanced density), back-styles (cupped for use as a packer, flat-backed " for use as a strap on...)...there's even an uncircumcised version.  I'm pretty sure they all have 3-d balls.  S92o21's post reads as follows (since it's attached to a racy picture, I'll just creditcopyandpaste):

"So, I'm thinking about ordering these (..excluding the doll itself). I've been looking everywhere for a realistic looking and relatively cheap uncircumcised packers and I'm set on these.  The flaccid one is a little over 3" ($100) and the erect one is 7" ($250).

Those penises are meant strictly for these realistic dolls but I contacted the company and they said that they would be willing to sell the penises to FTMs to use as a packer. They've been very kind and answered every question I had. I've already ordered samples to get it to match my skin tone perfectly and once I've decided on the colour I will order the packers. And I'll be sure to review them for you guys! "


I'm going to be contacting him for more information, but it was just too exciting for me to keep to myself for now.

ive run into them once or twice through various packer searches. looks pretty good! let us know how it works out

I'd also like to know more about these. I found them on the website and am very intrigued--might be considering one for basic packer use. Let us know how it goes man.

They look fantastic!

Let us know what they say, I'm very intrigued!

Found some more links: a guy who actually bought a packer from this company (it looks...well, AMAZING), and also a FAQ post that answers a few important questions for future buyers...and has pictures!

http://partsprivate.tumblr.com/page/3
http://sinthetics.com/forum/topic.php?id=60





(I hope these aren't too graphic...I'll remove if I'm told to; just trying to show how amazing these lower-priced packers look.)


The "Good Bits":

"The price shown of $250 is for the upgraded version which has multiple grades of silicone for soft scrotum with testicles inside, softer outer layer to the shaft which has a firmer core. If you just want the single-stage (one density of silicone like a regular dildo but still realistic looking) the price is $99. "

"The testicles are little individual "balls" set into a gel within the "skin" of the scrotum."

"The color is mostly permanent but it is applied after the silicone is cured so with a lot of friction over time the color could come off. It does take a considerable amount of friction and play for the color to start to come off. If it does wear off we can give pointers on replacing it."

That's awesome I plan on ordering from here after I transition more, this is just too impressive to pass up.

I was just thinking that for the price of one Reel Magik, you could get a hard pack and a soft pack from here.  Of course, I don't think they'll be as advanced, but still.

I just ordered my silicone samples...man.  This is exciting.

I'm still a little cautious, though.  After seeing the RM videos and saving for ages for their prosthetic, spending that cash on another (very underrepresented) product is a bit of a leap.

Does anyone know if they can be made without the 'base' or not?  On their forum they say that it's to protect the wearers pelvis during penetration but in my opinion it detracts from the whole realism of the thing, which is sort of the whole point...

alex you can get the cup back design thats what i would get. im going to get one after christmas.

Ah yeah, didn't see that there.  Thanks for pointing it out.  I'll keep that in mind if I ever have that amount of money that's not getting sucked up by education and travel expenses.

Wow, those are so realistic.... I was considering getting the RM basic packer once I started presenting male, but I'll to look into these now.

Thanks for the info Nowhereboi

The RM basic isn't bad.  I'd say it's the most realistic FEELING packer I've ever had, hands down.  The shape and heft are perfect. It warms so, so well.  Is just the right amount of...um.  Squishy.  And with the weight, I know that something is there when I wear it, but it doesn't feel at all like a lump of plastic; I really feel like it's a part of me.

Then I look down, and...well.  The color is kind of disappointing.

I've asked the guy who  ordered from Sinthetics about the feel and the longevity of the coloring;  he should be replying soon.  I really hope that this feels as nice as RM...feel was never an issue for me before, but now I don't think I could compromise. 

I think there are tutorials on here somewhere on how to fix packer colour issues.

@ DeeperThanSwords

Oh yeah.  I tried, though, and well...I dunno.  I think it's the material.  The color didn't sink in very well, and I was afraid it would wipe off all over everything.  Also, the RM basic has surface-issues.  Makes recoloring kind of a pain.  From a distance, it looks great, but at arm's length, it looks very flaky and kind of...unwell. Hah. I found that the whole thing made it seem even less realistic to me than the original color, so I washed it off and started looking for some other options.  Maybe recoloring the RM basic will work out smoother once we find a sealant, but for now I'd go with something like Sinthetics.

Ah, I see. That's a shame. Colour seems to be a common stumbling block for packers.

These look great.
I'll probably end up getting one of them in the neat future, or something.

I wish I'd known about these guys sooner.

I'm not swayed...they look pretty good, but still not as realistic as the RM prosthetics...these look...airbrushed and soft?  Not sure how to describe it...the RM prosthetics have a more realistic skin color...I think the word is mottled...where there is actually texture with the coloring, like real skin has.  They aren't bad for the price, but I love the way my RM looks and feels...these kind of remind me of something you might get at a sex shop.  I do wish RM would allow paint options on their packers...

I don't know what they would call these but you can't compare a packer with a prosthetic. The RM *prosthetics look great, it's true and have this shading and realistic coloration. You can't do this in a packer. If you got paints and painted a packer than the packer is going to cost a lot more.

The RM packer has a nice base color, imo, but that's all. It just doesn't look like flesh.

The price of these is like the high end packers made of silicon. You are paying for the higher price of silicon and that it's harder to work with than cyberskin foam.



--Jay

If you guys are looking for more pictures to help you to make your decision,  check here:

http://www.ourdollcommunity.com/gallery/thumbnails.php?album=398

(it has pretty good pictures that show the flexibility of the balls)

And a video:

Thanks for posting this!  I'm now interested in getting the flaccid uncircumcised as I haven't seen an uncut packer/prosthetic that was good quality and under $300 before.