Quote from: Cindy James on March 14, 2013, 03:55:10 AM
They look OK. But they also depend on so many other factors, are you on implants, pills, etc. What was the previous, one off results mean little, it is the trend that is important
Also your LFT and SHBG etc..
They use the male range because you are being adapted from male to female. Your body mass and physiology is that of a male.
Our physiology will remain largely male as FtM remain largely female.
For example my blood volume etc will not change and most of my blood pic will not change to the female normal range.
From a pathology point of view I personally like results for trans people as as XY female or XX male. To me when I get those results I know that (for example) the woman I'm looking at has a normal range for people with an XY driven physiology etc.
Cindy
No they use the male ranges because they're incompetent and lazy.
The goal range for transgender people is generally on the order of hormonal levels that are congruent with the gender of identification. Using the gender of identification reference ranges makes it much easier to follow that, otherwise the test results will flag the levels EVERY time regardless of if things are ok or not. Our physiology is not male, or female, it is human.
This is not rocket science, if memory serves you work in medicine so you ought to know that.
A great many of us have our blood work done using the target gender reference ranges, it's really not that big a deal.

Body masses vary tremendously from person to person and we don't suddenly flip someones reference ranges to F when they're M just because the male happens to be a relatively small person.

It is not an EXACT science but there is absolutely no good reason not to, and in fact some good rational to using the gender of identification reference ranges
EDIT: Oh and to the original poster, it's lacking a big in information but from a glance I don't think the estradiol and testosterone levels are something to worry about following female ranges.... the estrone seems rather high but I'm much less familiar with the estrone reference ranges, I haven't seen it tested for very frequently.