I think we need to cut some slack towards people who use brave. Their perspective is far different from ours. I have used "Brave" to describe many of the people in my group. Hell, I've used it to describe my wife/gf of 30+ years, 25+ years post-op.
I can very much understand not liking that description. In fact, like others when applied to me and my journey, I go WTF??? I try to see it this way, as an outsider getting a glimpse of the inner realm. No matter what, we ARE undertaking and acting upon a course that is pretty much totally and absolutely frowned upon by most of society.
I call it it as I see it; Twice I chickened out. The opposite of brave. While at the same time I cannot attribute "bravery", especially to myself!, for doing what I need to do today. Yes, it takes some conviction to venture out into the real world presenting as the real you. Yes, you may not be the ideal, nobody is! But to hurting TG people that know you, as well as Cis people, what we do IS, in a sense, brave. Not many people are willing to do it knowing the consequences.
Even though I didn't follow through, for the 1970's I was doing a lot more than others inflicted with being TG in an intolerant world. Me attempting to try, I never saw as being brave. I was picked on most of my life for a myriad of things. Yet I chickened out for that very reason. I wasn't emotionally up to facing a lifetime of the same, and volunteering for it!
Yes, the "Bravery" argument, to us, goes out the window when we are faced with "Transition is just another word for nothing else to loose" (Sorry Janis) But for those not at that point, they see as us brave. Their fear paralyzes them. For cis folks, they cannot imagine what it takes to present as the opposite sex any more than they imagine leading a charge at Verdun