Quote from: Tadpole on June 28, 2013, 07:10:15 PM
do any of you find this morally wrong or irresponsible?
I don't think it's morally wrong, it's just a bit unusual.
As for whether it's irresponsible, you didn't give enough detail for me to say for certain, but I'd be more inclined to say yes, it's irresponsible. That's with the assumption that you are single and do not plan to be in a long-term relationship with the guy who gets you pregnant (resulting in you being a single father later on).
Deciding to have a child, whether by the "traditional" route or via adoption etc, has to be more than just a whim or an emotionally-based choice. It's a big decision, and it's not just about you and what you want. It's about making sure that you can provide for your child in every way (financially, emotionally, etc.) and committing to being the best parent you can be. A lot of people say that deciding to have a kid is a decision that effects you for 18 years (plus pregnancy time, obviously), but it's a lot longer than that: it's a lifetime. If you're not certain about it, or if you cannot accept devoting a good portion of the rest of your life (more so in the growing-up stage, but you'd still need to be there after he or she is an adult) to taking care of your child, then don't do it.
Think of it this way: if your father was deciding whether they wanted to have a kid (you), would you want him to do so without being emotionally or perhaps even financially prepared? Probably not. You'd probably want (assuming you had a choice, in this theoretical example) your father to wait until he was in a long-term relationship with someone so you would have the benefit of having two parents, and to wait until he knew for sure that he could take care of you properly.
Please keep in mind that I'm basing this response on assumptions and that I certainly do not intend to offend you (or to imply that single parents aren't doing a good job; I simply believe that, in most cases, it's better to have a couple raise a child if possible).
As for the testosterone aspect, I would suggest that if you do intend to go through with the pregnancy, don't start on T until after. You'll have to stop being on T anyway during the pregnancy, and though I don't know from personal experience what that's like (pregnancy after T), I do know what it's like to be on T and then have your body revert to estrogen (as I can't afford T anymore and have been off it for over a year). It's not fun. In some ways, it makes life more difficult for me because of how great I felt in comparison to how I feel now without the right hormones; you may have a similar experience if you start T prior to getting pregnant.
Additionally, there is a better chance of a successful pregnancy if you wait until after to start T. Testosterone can reduce fertility levels (or whatever you call it) and, probably depending on how long you're on T before getting pregnant, it could render you sterile.
There are other things to take into account, such as whether you truly believe you can handle the hormonal/physical changes that come with pregnancy, but that stuff's common knowledge so I'm not going to go into detail about it.
Whatever you decide, make sure you really think it out and don't act on impulse or forget about the long-term consequences. Good luck!