Quote from: Donna Elvira on August 18, 2013, 05:35:33 PM
... I am really curious to understand what advantage you and Lara see to using FUE. If you are doing a large surface, FUT makes far more sense to me with FUE as a solution if you just need some touch ups at a later date.
Using FUT, I did almost double the number of grafts Lara did in less than a quarter of the time and I have no reason to believe there is any significant difference in the final result.
Hi Donna,
Good question! I met with the surgeon, and he explained the major differences between FUE and FUT as the following:
- FUT provides denser hair in a shorter amount of surgical time, but may also leave a thin scar from the donor site whereas FUE only leaves "scar dots" that are less noticeable.
- FUT healing time may be longer due to incision, and there may be a period of numbness along the donor site that FUE usually does not have (no scalpel with FUE, as I understand it).
- FUE is supposed to have a more "pain free" recovery.
- FUE can be selectively taken from different spots to "selectively thin" certain areas, and also provide finer hair in targeted areas (like the front)
- FUE is more expensivee than FUT, that is certain, and not recommended for large areas, but as long as I am staying under 3,000 units, I should be okay.
- One downside aside from costs, is that FUE (as explained to me) can sometimes have an 80-90% success rate, whereas FUT is closer to 95+%.
I think both techniques work fine, as I understand them, and really it comes down to personal preference. I have not fully made up my mind, but probably leaning toward FUE to avoid pain and scarring, and the surgeon suggested it would probably be the best way to achieve the results I am trying to achieve.
Best,
Toni