brain candy? that's a delicious way to call it.
last night when i started thinking about it, i suddenly found this rather similar to the buddhist meditations over things like the number of leaves on a tree, grains of sand in the ocean, or the number of stars in the sky. an exact number that is impossible to count. the chinese even have a numeral that means either an exact extremely high number, or the exact number of stars in the sky. depends a little on whether you're dealing with maths or philosophy.
and these gender discussions strike me as something very similar to that. it's impossible to see the whole picture, so we can only imagine, but even imagining it is extremely difficult. but i believe that the more we talk about it and share those thoughts and experiences that we have, the closer we get to revealing the fact that is hidden somewhere deep below the surface.
Quote from: Ativan Prescribed on August 29, 2013, 12:30:15 PM
The Great Plains, maybe? 
Alternate universes where gender isn't an issue? 
Another curious thing to ponder.
Visible light is such a small part of the spectrum.
Do we really expect gender to end at the visible edges of what we perceive?
How wonderful to think that it could be so much bigger than what we think it is.
There could be so much more to us that we can explore and discover.
Diversity that extends beyond the visible spectrum of gender.
It makes bigotry seem so much smaller in it's flawed logic, than it already is.
Indeed, we are so much more than we already know.
Ativan
we're still only seeing the smallest part of the picture if we haven't even been to the great plains yet.
that we can't see it doesn't mean that it doesn't exist. just like the funny europeans who made the conclusion that there all swans are white, simply because they'd never seen a black swan.
this whole gender thing has a practical part, and a philosophical part. i really like how we can talk about the philosophical part of it here. maybe it takes an awareness of more than just the binaries to be able to think this far about it.
humans are interesting.
and the world becomes so much more interesting through different humans' experiences.
when you and i see something differently, i find it worth discussing this. is it the thing itself that is different to us, or is it our perceptions? and how far can we even trust our own perceptions? i found evidence of being something i am not, and only realized when i saw myself from a different angle. never thought about going around to look at another side. there's no fence or anything hindering me rom going there, but i believed in other people who told me that i'm supposed to stay on only one side. and what i saw on that one side wasn't really all that contrary to what everybody, including myself, expected to see.