Do you think when he was wooden he had all the boy parts? And when he became a real boy do you think he had them then?

I'm thinking no when he was wood & yes when he was real.

Just my opinion. I don't really know. It never occurred to me to look.

I think yes to both!

I think that  he was a real boy even when he was wooden.  Parts don't make anyone a "real" boy.  I know that for a fact. Boys are boys with or without parts.  Enough said.

tink

QuoteJust my two cents, don't really know, but where's the expression "WOODY" come from anyway?

LOL 

ROTFLMAOTD!  From Pinocchio no less?  Who'd a thunk it?

Wow!  I couldn't breath.  That Kiera is a wild one.

From now on instead of saying that I am packing, I'm gonna say Pinocchio is in my pocket.

"look! Here comes Thundra and her pocket pinocchio!!" - said one awestruck young woman to the other.

Okay, everybody. Stay away from Kiera. It's for your own safety.

Quote from: Kiera on July 15, 2007, 08:08:19 PM
Ok, and Thundra, Does Your "Real Boy" Ever Tell Lies?

I am giggling like a fool

I don't see why the toy maker (was it a toy maker, i can't even remeber the story...) would go and craft a penis ect. for his wooden toy. It's not that necessary coz the doll always had clothes on. I think... But i geuss he could have.

When he was flesh and blood, i think he would have been given the parts. But we'll never know.

QuoteInsert Quote
Quote from: Kiera on Yesterday at 08:08:19 PM
Ok, and Thundra, Does Your "Real Boy" Ever Tell Lies?

Whatever it takes my dear.....