QuoteI tend to think of it as going from A (male), past B (andro), to C (female), and then back to B. If you go A to B, I feel many will just consider you an androgynous guy and not "serious". Going all the way to C,and then back to B will, in my (limited) view, help solidify that, while presenting androgynous, you are in fact female. Hopefully that makes as much sense in writing as it did in my head.
I also was a bit of a riddle to a previous therapist who didn't really specialize in gender. This was a few years back when I was just beginning to figure myself out. She asked if I had looked into finding any Trans* groups nearby, and I said I didn't feel that I would have much in common with them, as they mostly have a set end point on a relatively set path. I also confused her even more when I said I seemed to identify more with FTM's than MTF's, which also still confuses me to this day.
Ah well.
Hmmmm.....yes, actually the A to C before reverting to B eventually, does make sense physically, as its necessary for a male to have to do that in order to get enough momentum to override the abundant masculinity. The B part is something FTM's can potentially live with, as they don't have to turn back the clock as it were. Its a more linear process for FTM, physically at least.
But personally, I'm keen to skip the extreme swerve to the female regarding presentation and social alignment, as I feel it would be hugely detrimental to take-on a female identity socially when I look male. I never intend on going out wearing dresses, skirts, etc whilst presenting as female.Only if I happened to seriously pass would I actually do that.
So physically - yes I'd be going from A straight C, but stop-short of absolute C, because I'm non-binary, and like yourself - I find I have much more in common with FTM identities than the "classic" MTF identity.
But socially - Definitely A - B with lots and lots of C and a bit of A. But not strictly C or A. If I happened to suddenly become more binary female, and passed physically, then I'm sure C would be the final, exclusive, destination.
With regard to MTFs being close to FTMs - the reason why nobody undertsand it, and not even ourselves, is because of the fact that we're all still conditioned to thinking of women as women in the traditional sense. The idea of transitioning to the female form but appearing purposely as andro seems ridiculous as we haven't quite gotten over the age-old idea that a woman is 100% feminine. Its a simple concept to grasp - cis-women can have an andro identity, and so can a transexual woman. However, the transexual woman has the extra hurdle in that she has to become an actual woman first, before she can express the andro part of that female identity.
Its an extension of the circular railway-line that is the gender spectrum. However this line and its new station "Andro" is so new, that no-one recognises that it can legitimately exist, yet. However, those that do know it exist see its perceived proximity to the masculine male station at the opposite end of the track. So instead of letting you go round the whole track from male to andro-female , they simply push you further back to the masculine station, and say "why bother being female if you aren't going to be like a traditional woman? Why not just stay male?"
Fun fun fun indeed! Personally, I don't think the human race will ever get over these issues. Not whilst there's still natural procreation, straight males and straight females in the world. Gender plasticity just isn't compatible with the human need to baby-make.