Susan's Place Logo

News:

Based on internal web log processing I show 3,417,511 Users made 5,324,115 Visits Accounting for 199,729,420 pageviews and 8.954.49 TB of data transfer for 2017, all on a little over $2,000 per month.

Help support this website by Donating or Subscribing! (Updated)

Main Menu

Dosages

Started by LittleEmily24, February 18, 2014, 11:41:40 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

LittleEmily24

Here's yet another newbie question post by your friendly neighborhood Emily....

Or more like a slight worry...

Today was the day I actually started taking the hormones and my Endo prescribed:

Estradiol, medroxyprogesterone And spiro

~ because I have such glorious luck and such a stable sense of anxiety (heavily sarcastic) someone decided to tell me today that my doses were "very low" ....

So, naturally, I'm having an anxiety attack -_-

I don't know what my levels are as my Endo says he prefers to go by "what his patients feel" instead of their levels... According to him it's because in his experience in the past, he's had patients who need higher or lower dosages despite their levels...

I have a follow up in the next 3 weeks to see how I'm doing.. But now this person and some online resources are leaving me feeling like that 3 week follow up is going to be pointless and fruitless... I'm not expecting to "see" any changes... But at the very least I expect to "feel" them in some way (i.e. Mental/emotional or something)

Sorry if this seems or is very stupid or naive of me... I know very little and am placing most of my trust in my Endo especially since my psych recommended him

On top of that... I'm not sure if my estradiol is sublingual or not...





Edited for Dosages - DO NOT POST DOSAGES
  •  

Danielle Emmalee

Don't listen to "someone."  You may be on a low dose, but that's okay to start with.
Discord, I'm howlin' at the moon
And sleepin' in the middle of a summer afternoon
Discord, whatever did we do
To make you take our world away?

Discord, are we your prey alone,
Or are we just a stepping stone for taking back the throne?
Discord, we won't take it anymore
So take your tyranny away!
  •  

kelly_aus

But here's a question for you.. Is your friend a doctor? Are they an endo? Or a gyno? Trust in the expert - we all react slightly differently.

And no, in 3 weeks you probably won't have seen any physical change - but you should notice a mental change..
  •  

Hikari

i wouldn't be concerned about low dosages. I am on a very small dosage, and I am making progress just fine, if your body doesn't respond enough over time then I would bring it up...

What I would try and bring up to your endo is medroxyprogesterone, this stuff has been shown to cause depression in lots of people whereas micronized (bioidentical) progesterone doesn't (AFAIK) it is sold under brand name prometrium. I would wonder why the endo choose a synthetic while a bioidentical version exists and is readily available.

I find the effect of HRT differs from person to person, I know people who take over quadruple the dose of spiro I do to get their T down for example. You should try and get by with the least amount that produces the desired effect IMO.
私は女の子 です!My Blog - Hikari's Transition Log http://www.susans.org/forums/index.php/board,377.0.html
  •  

V M

Hi Emily  :)

It is very common for an experienced doctor to prescribe a low dose to start with, do blood work and then adjust accordingly to each individual's needs

Some folks think that the more you take the better, but that could not be further from the truth, often it is just the opposite

It may sound cliche, but when it comes to HRT often 'less is more' and 'slow and steady' is what get's the job done better

I would recommend to relax and trust your Dr. I would however also inquire about the bio-identical meds if possible
The main things to remember in life are Love, Kindness, Understanding and Respect - Always make forward progress

Superficial fanny kissing friends are a dime a dozen, a TRUE FRIEND however is PRICELESS


- V M
  •  

KayXo

Quote from: LittleEmily24 on February 18, 2014, 11:41:40 PMToday was the day I actually started taking the hormones and my Endo prescribed:

Estradiol, medroxyprogesterone And spiro


I strongly advise against the use of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA, Provera). For several reasons.

1) It may, in some, increase anxiety, irritability, depression, even make some suicidal. I've read more than at least 100 reports, if not more, of transsexual women, experiencing mood disorders on it. Micronized, bio-identical progesterone, on the other hand, does not have these effects but may cause slight depression if too much is taken relative to estrogen. In general, though, it is anxiolytic and can improve sleep. 

J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 2000 May;9(4):381-7

"When compared with the MPA-containing
regimen, women using micronized progesterone-containing HRT
experienced significant improvement in vasomotor symptoms, somatic
complaints, and anxiety and depressive symptoms."

CLIMACTERIC 2005;8(Suppl 1):3–63
Pharmacology of estrogens and progestogens: influence of different routes of administration

""It has been shown that MPA may impair the beneficial effects of CEE on depressive mood and other psychological symptoms in postmenopausal women"

CEE is conjugated equine estrogens (Premarin)

J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004 Jun;89(6):2998-3006.

"These findings suggest that MPA antagonizes certain behavioral effects of E2 that may be beneficial to women, and that it does so more profoundly or in ways that endogenous P4 does not. The marked increase in aggression seen during MPA treatment suggests that production of negative affect may be a particularly serious side effect of MPA."

E2 is estradiol and P4 is bio-identical progesterone.

2) It is mildly androgenic whereas progesterone is not. That's why it is never given to pregnant women whereas progesterone is for prevention of miscarriage.

Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology Copyright 2007 by the American Psychological Association
2007, Vol. 15, No. 5, 427–444

"Synthetic progestins marketed as Provera, PremPro, and Cycrin are widely used but may produce a number of significant side effects, such as fatigue, fluid retention, lipid level alterations, dysphoria, hypercoagulant states, and increased androgenicity. Natural progesterones are reported to have milder adverse effects"

CLIMACTERIC 2005;8(Suppl 1):3–63
Pharmacology of estrogens and progestogens: influence of different routes of administration

"MPA has no antiandrogenic effect, but weak androgenic properties."

Contraception. 1987 Oct;36(4):373-402.

"Progesterone (P), the natural hormone, binds to its specific
receptors to induce specific progestational effects. In addition to
this binding, P is able to interfere with the binding sites of other
steroids. Therefore the natural hormone exhibits an anti-estrogenic
activity, and anti-androgenic activity and also exerts anti-
mineralocorticoid effects. For a long time progesterone could not be
used in clinical applications because of a rapid liver inactivation
after oral administration. An oral micronized preparation of
progesterone is now available which produces adequate plasma and
tissue levels of progesterone. The preparation reproduces the anti-
estrogenic effect of the natural hormone on the endometrium . It also reproduces the anti-mineralocorticoid effect and has no androgenic action. No side effects have been
reported as far as lipids profile, coagulation factors and blood
pressure are concerned."

3) It increases breast cancer risk vs progesterone that does not. Has been associated with increased risk in the famous 2003 WHI study.

CLIMACTERIC 2005;8(Suppl 1):3–63
Pharmacology of estrogens and progestogens: influence of different routes of administration

"Recent epidemiological studies found an increase in the relative risk by 20–30% during treatment with CEE/MPA" (risk of breast cancer)

"The nearly significant reduction in breast cancer incidence in women treated with CEE alone"

Med Hypotheses. 2001 Feb;56(2):213-6.

"Recent epidemiology indicates that unopposed oral estrogen
replacement therapy has a surprisingly small impact on breast cancer
risk--little if any in overweight women--whereas combined regimens
featuring synthetic progestins are attended by a much larger
increase in this risk."

Int J Cancer. 2005 Apr 10;114(3):448-54.

""(...)Our study shows an increased risk of breast cancer associated
with HRT use. It indicates that the association between HRT use
and breast cancer risk most likely varies according to the type of
progestogen used. There was no or little increase in risk with
estrogens used alone or combined with micronized progesterone,
at least when used for short periods. The increase in risk reached
significance when estrogens were combined with synthetic progestins
and was significantly greater than when combined with
micronized progesterone."

J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2005 Jul;96(2):95-108.

""Controlled studies and most observational studies published over
the last 5 years suggest that the addition of synthetic progestins
to estrogen in hormone replacement therapy (HRT), particularly in
continuous-combined regimen, increases the breast cancer (BC) risk
compared to estrogen alone. By contrast, a recent study suggests
that the addition of natural progesterone in cyclic regimens does
not affect BC risk. This finding is consistent with in vivo data
suggesting that progesterone does not have a detrimental effect on
breast tissue."

4) It has negative effects on the cardiovascular system whereas progesterone does not. It increases clotting risks.

Climacteric. 2003 Dec;6(4):293-301

"Recent report, particularly the Women's Health
Initiative, demonstrated that hormone therapy with combined estrogen
plus progestin increased the incidence of heart attacks, stroke,
blood clots, breast cancer and dementia in women over 65 years old.
We investigated the role of synthetic progestins in initiating the
adverse events associated with estrogen therapy"

"The acute peripheral and cerebrovascular responses were measured following intraperitoneal or intravenous administration of progesterone, synthetic progestins (medroxyprogesterone acetate and
norethindrone) or estrogens (conjugated equine estrogens and 17 beta-
estradiol). "

"In both peripheral and cerebral vasculature,
synthetic progestins caused endothelial disruption, accumulation of
monocytes in the vessel wall, platelet activation and clot
formation, which are early events in atherosclerosis, inflammation
and thrombosis. Natural progesterone or estrogens did not show such
toxicity."

CLINICAL THERAPEUTICWVOL. 21, NO. 1, 1999
Oral Micronized Progesterone

""the most commonly used synthetic progestins, norethisterone and medroxyprogesterone acetate, have been associated with metabolic and vascular side effects (eg, suppression of the vasodilating effect of estrogens) in both experimental and human controlled studies.All comparative studies to date conclude that the side effects of synthetic progestins can be minimized or eliminated through the use of natural progesterone, which is identical to the steroid produced by the corpus luteum."

"The progestins do, however, have a number of potential negative effects, particularly metabolic and vascular effects."

"all randomized, controlled studies in animals and humans have consistently shown that the most popular synthetic progestins, including those with only weak androgenic activity (eg, medroxyprogesterone acetate [MPAJ), induce significant disturbances in lipid levels, glucose metabolism, vasomotility, and histologic appearance of the artery walls."

"In controlled animal studies and short-term human trials, however, no side effects were observed when circulating levels of natural progesterone were kept within the range seen during the normal luteal phase.Therefore, natural progesterone may have a better risk-benefit profile than that of the synthetic progestins."

"The results of published clinical studies show minimal or no changes in lipid profile, blood pressure, or carbohydrate metabolism during treatment with oral micronized progesterone.28 This safety profile contrasts with the reported negative effects of some synthetic progestins, including adverse effects on lipid metabolism and glucose tolerance. Several studies, including the 3-year prospective PEP1 study, 4, 28 have shown that oral micronized progesterone significantly improves metabolic tolerance compared with such progestins as MPA.52,54,58"

"Only minor adverse events have been reported in association with oral micronized progesterone therapy in clinical trials. Dizziness and sleepiness are the primary adverse reactions reported.33 However, these side effects can be suppressed by administering micronized progesterone at bedtime. 29 Oral micronized progesterone is therefore an effective and well-tolerated form of progestogen replacement in premenopausal and postmenopausal women"

Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology Copyright 2007 by the American Psychological Association
2007, Vol. 15, No. 5, 427–444

"It is important to note that although progesterone and synthetic progestins are used for similar purposes, these may not exert similar modulatory effects on target organs, and each progestin molecule may have specific effects on neuroendocrine action (Bernardi et al., 2006). For example, a commonly used progestin, MPA, was shown to induce more negative somatic effects, more reports of breast tenderness, and increased magnitude and duration of vaginal bleeding in comparison with natural (micronized, oil-suspended) progesterone in early menopausal women (Cummings & Brizendine, 2002). MPA and natural progesterone also were found to differ with respect to molecular signaling in human endothelial cells, suggesting that there may be differential cardiovascular effects (Simoncini et al., 2004)."

Biol Psychol. 2005 Apr;69(1):39-56. Epub 2005 Jan 4.

"89 healthy postmenopausal women were tested twice, before
and after exposure for about 8 weeks to one of the five conditions:
placebo, Estratab (primarily estrone), Estratab plus Prometrium
(micronized progesterone), Estratab plus Provera (synthetic
progestin), and Estratest (same estrogen as in Estratab plus
methyltestosterone)."

"Women assigned to Estratab plus Prometrium had diminished diastolic blood pressure responses
during a speech stressor upon retesting, whereas women assigned to Estratab plus Provera increased."

Also, an anecdotal report from a transsexual woman

"Medroxyprogesterone was bad for affecting blood clotting too but I couldn't stand it for more than I think it was 5 days before I had to stop it. It did temporarily alter my blood clotting test though."

"Also the worst clotting offender for me was Androcur. During that time I needed * to * warfarin. Once I stopped using that, not even my usual (...) estrogel could put me that high, nor use of prometrium." Prometrium is bio-identical progesterone.








I am not a medical doctor, nor a scientist - opinions expressed by me on the subject of HRT are merely based on my own review of some of the scientific literature over the last decade or so, on anecdotal evidence from women in various discussion forums that I have come across, and my personal experience

On HRT since early 2004
Post-op since late 2005
  •  

KayXo

Quote from: LittleEmily24 on February 18, 2014, 11:41:40 PMI don't know what my levels are as my Endo says he prefers to go by "what his patients feel" instead of their levels... According to him it's because in his experience in the past, he's had patients who need higher or lower dosages despite their levels...

I agree with him 100%. :)










I am not a medical doctor, nor a scientist - opinions expressed by me on the subject of HRT are merely based on my own review of some of the scientific literature over the last decade or so, on anecdotal evidence from women in various discussion forums that I have come across, and my personal experience

On HRT since early 2004
Post-op since late 2005
  •  

KayXo


Emily, you're going to see your doctor in only 3 weeks so if things aren't up to par, you can always decide together to increase your dose for more significant results. It also takes about 2 months to really see if the given dose is actually having a significant effect. Be happy you are on your way...and that you're seeing him so soon...:)
I am not a medical doctor, nor a scientist - opinions expressed by me on the subject of HRT are merely based on my own review of some of the scientific literature over the last decade or so, on anecdotal evidence from women in various discussion forums that I have come across, and my personal experience

On HRT since early 2004
Post-op since late 2005
  •  

LittleEmily24

OK so i've concluded that the medroxyprogesterone will definitely be a topic of discussion in my 3 week follow-up. thanks for the info everyone :)
  •  

Eva Marie

Quote from: LittleEmily24 on February 19, 2014, 11:34:03 AM
OK so i've concluded that the medroxyprogesterone will definitely be a topic of discussion in my 3 week follow-up. thanks for the info everyone :)

There is a generic available for prometrium. I get mine at Walmart and it's labeled simply progesterone. It's a lot cheaper than prometrium.
  •  

kira21 ♡♡♡

A low dose of estrogen is a good way to start as it seems to result in higher breast volume and shape, when compared to just hitting the body with a large dose from day 1.

See this research paper on dosages and breast development http://press.endocrine.org/doi/full/10.1210/jc.2012-2030

I am 100% with KayXo regarding MPA. I would not take the medroxyprogesterone acetate. There are many studies that show it to be ineffective (Meyer et al 1986 springs to mind though there are other papers) and just adds the tablets associated risks that KayXo identifies. 

For feminisation I wouldn't even recommend taking micronised progesterone (which is the only progestin I would take) until you have had elevated estrogen levels for a few months. Progesterone has no feminising effects by itself, though there can be other benefits, such as cognitive function, thyroid function, etc. (but it's funny how many endos and gender-specialists boil every tablet down to breast growth though; I suppose mtf people are just breasts on legs).

If your endo is anything like pretty much everyone else's, then you had better get the research yourself and give it to them, or nothing will get done.


KayXo

I agree with Akira that you should wait a little before adding progesterone. I'm not sure if it really makes a difference. But, don't overdo it at first in terms of breast stimulation. Go slow, like ciswomen when they hit puberty. First, estrogen increases, then later progesterone to complete mammary growth. Wait perhaps 2 years, maybe even more. And a low dose is best at first...the lowest effective dose, as always. ;)
I am not a medical doctor, nor a scientist - opinions expressed by me on the subject of HRT are merely based on my own review of some of the scientific literature over the last decade or so, on anecdotal evidence from women in various discussion forums that I have come across, and my personal experience

On HRT since early 2004
Post-op since late 2005
  •  

Ltl89

I started with a very low dose of estrogen.  Honestly, I really felt like I had a minimal response until my dose was readjusted for the second time, but that could have been because of time and all.  I don't know.  In any event, it seems like it's common to start on low doses and then check the blood work to ensure nothing is wrong.  So, I wouldn't worry. 
  •  

Jenna Marie

My endo is another who starts at a very low dose and also believes in going by patient's happiness about the progress rather than lab tests. And I've had fantastic results, so it's possible for this method to work fine. :)
  •  

KayXo

Every time I hear of doctors not relying on lab tests, I'm a tad more hopeful about doctors finally realizing how to best treat us. Slowly, but surely...Big smile on my face. Yay!  ;D
I am not a medical doctor, nor a scientist - opinions expressed by me on the subject of HRT are merely based on my own review of some of the scientific literature over the last decade or so, on anecdotal evidence from women in various discussion forums that I have come across, and my personal experience

On HRT since early 2004
Post-op since late 2005
  •  

EllieM


Emily, you have just begun. It's better to excercise caution when changing your body's hormone balance. Keep in mind, GGs don't suddenly have some magic tap open and flood the body with estrogen. It builds up slowly. As for how you are to take the estradiol, you can ask the pharmacist if it can be taken sublingualy. I have read that for some formulations that is an option, and my understanding is that it is kinder to your liver if you can do it that way.

As for progesterone (yeah, I'm using prometrium)  I have heard many theories. The one I choose to favour is that it is present in an adult female, I am an adult striving to be female, so why not? Besides, my endo thinks it is a solid approach. (that would be the number 1 reason) His philosophy is: adjust the brain effects, the body will follow. So far, so good.

There is debate as well,  about how to achieve the anti androgen effect. One method is (simply stated) to block androgen reception, eg: spiro. Another method is to inhibit androgen production, eg: suprefact. But, my dear, these are questions for you and your doctor to sort out. I can only provide you with anecdotal data, n=1. Ok, I suppose if I took more time to read the body of literature, I could give you something more substantial, but then, isn't that what your doctor does on a daily basis?

It takes time, Emily. Don't worry, hon, you are on your way :)
  •  

Jenna Marie

I should probably clarify that my doctor doesn't run E levels and will ignore T levels if the patient's responsiveness and happiness suggest that the current dose is working well. She DOES monitor all necessary health markers including liver function tests. :)
  •  

KayXo

Quote from: EllieM on February 19, 2014, 03:38:30 PM
As for how you are to take the estradiol, you can ask the pharmacist if it can be taken sublingualy.

If it is a tablet and contains micronized estradiol, then it can be taken sublingually. But, levels will spike and then decline quickly...so best to take it a few times daily to avoid ups and downs. :)

Quote from: EllieM on February 19, 2014, 03:38:30 PM
One method is (simply stated) to block androgen reception, eg: spiro. Another method is to inhibit androgen production, eg: suprefact.

Spiro actually reduces androgen and weakly blocks androgen receptors. Whereas Suprefact only reduces androgen. Just wanted to clarify. :)
I am not a medical doctor, nor a scientist - opinions expressed by me on the subject of HRT are merely based on my own review of some of the scientific literature over the last decade or so, on anecdotal evidence from women in various discussion forums that I have come across, and my personal experience

On HRT since early 2004
Post-op since late 2005
  •  

LittleEmily24

I'm curious about wether or not there are specific times to be taking the pills. I currently take all my doses in the morning with my breakfast, but is there's a way I can maximize this by taking it at a certain time of day?

None of them make me drowsy (so far)
  •  

KayXo

Not really. Just take them twice daily at whatever time best suits you. Food somewhat increases spiro absorption and reduces stomach irritation. That's about it!
I am not a medical doctor, nor a scientist - opinions expressed by me on the subject of HRT are merely based on my own review of some of the scientific literature over the last decade or so, on anecdotal evidence from women in various discussion forums that I have come across, and my personal experience

On HRT since early 2004
Post-op since late 2005
  •