Quote from: retransition on March 14, 2014, 07:12:21 PM
However, if we can get to a place to where people have more options on how to manage that GD - especially at an earlier age - that do not necessarily lead to the extreme surgical and hormonal nullifications of the body's natural ecosystem I would want that to be available to others. Even better yet, if we can figure out how to prevent GD in the first place by looking into this important area I think this is crucial too. The same goes for autism spectrum of course - yes if you are on the spectrum that is nothing to be ashamed of and arguments can be made that it is not a disability at all (and that this diversity is an essential ingredient to the human race) but if there is something going on that is not natural (i.e. toxins, artificial hormones or other as yet unknown agents) is causing kids to be this way I think it is really important for us to keep looking deeper for answers. Correlations give us clues of where to go with this and of course you are right they do not imply any particular causation.
First I agree wholeheartedly, but finding a wider range of offered treatments has little to do with the comorbidity of GD an ASD, and doesn't have anything to do with it being scary and a huge huge issue. Finding a wider range of better treatment options is something that is needed with or without ASD comorbidity.
I wouldn't wish GD on anyone either. I seriously wish I wasn't trans, but at the same time, there is no universe where that wish translates to identifying as male for me. I'm not a man, never have been, never will be, and would not sacrifice myself to be feel comfortable in my body, even if that meant being free of the dysphoria I wouldn't be me. Just like if you were to cure me of my autism I wouldn't be me. Why? You can't rewire and restructure a person's brain without completely destroying the person. Oh sure the newly minted consciousness will probably have a lot of similarities to who I was, and remember being me, but they won't be me. You will have killed me, and replaced me with a close approximation. (FYI this is why Autism Speaks "Cure" has nothing to do with actually curing or helping living autistics. They know it's not remotely possible right now to rewire a brain and if it were, would have too many hurdles to be a possible treatment. No, much more realistic to develop a pre-natal screen that will allow mothers to abort autistic fetuses, while using propaganda and scare tactics to make this the more favorable option)
Evidence of Autism and GD have been around for about as long as humanity has been. They were unknown during their time, and never mentioned directly, and are seen as "new" conditions. They aren't. The growing number of autism diagnoses creating the epidemic fear, is merely that we've come a long way from our understand of it in the 60s when it was considered to be "infantile schizophrenia". That's right, it was so poorly understood that it was considered schizophrenia at first. And infantile because the schizophrenics were stuck in an infantile state of mind. It was also the mother's fault. Not even hugs and holding them as babies. Then we discovered it wasn't schizophrenia but it's own condition. Debunked the mother not holding enough cause. Discovered that autism had nothing to do with low mental ability, that was simply the many cases that had mental retardation as a often seen comorbid condition. Start to better understand what Autism is and how it present. Allowing us to better evaluate, assess and give treatment to those, like me, who would have been too high functioning 20 years ago to be diagnosed as autistic. The numbers haven't changed, only our ability to understand and recognize those who are on the spectrum a lot better.
Also it's not a male oriented condition, this past year a lot of advancement has finally be done in studying and recognizing how autism and asperger's present in females which is similar but different than how it presents in males. This understanding has already shown a large number of autistic girls and women that had been misdiagnosed due to the poor understanding of the differences, and we'll most likely see in the years to come the stats of boys and girls on the autism spectrum balance out.
((As an interesting aside, I fit the female presentation of autism symptomology almost perfectly, and at least 5 times better than I fit the male presentation.))
Gender Identity and dysphoria is exactly like Autism. Very very very new interms of labeling, recognizing and studying. It popped up around the 50s and 60s just like autism did, and out knowledge of it has grown exponentially since then. In both cases the growing numbers coincide merely with our better understanding of them. Which is also allowing us to recognize historic cases of them.
As for the distinction of wired to be versus wired to want to be, if they are truly dysphoric, heavily heavily dysphoric and transitioning shows success in improving quality of life significantly in both cases, is there really a difference?
Should we let the one that is suspected to be wired to want to be the opposite sex suffer the unbearable dysphoria because "They aren't trans enough?"