Susan's Place Logo

News:

Visit our Discord server  and Wiki

Main Menu

Stroke Risk on Estrogen

Started by ErinWDK, March 21, 2014, 03:35:52 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ErinWDK

OK, I have a doctor that will prescribe HRT on an informed consent basis.  This doctor has consulted with my primary care doctor and my cardiologist and both agree that I am old enough to make my decisions and they will not stand in the way.  That said they are both concerned about the increased risk of stroke if I go on Estrogen.  My primary care doctor was concerned enough that he had me come into his office and discuss this face to face.  Read this as he was REALLY concerned.

This has scared the fool out of me.  I have no data to assess if the benefit is worth the added risk.  Is there some sort of peer reviewed literature that address this issue (specifically stroke) in a comprehensive matter?  I know a lot has been said here about specifics of Estrogen therapy to minimize risks - the most repeated one is DVT.  DVT might be fatal, a stroke is a lot more likely to be fatal.  If anyone has citations for good references, I have acess to a full University library and I can get them.

I don't particularly want to remain male.  However, I really do not want to die trying to do something about it.  For the moment I am holding off on trying to start HRT.  The one doctor suggested going dressed (I really don't pass by any means) to a local trans conference to get more of an idea of how far down the rabbit hole I might go.  At the moment I am starting to get cold feet on even trying that.  What if I like it?  Would I then be willing to risk horrific complications?  Would that even be sane?

Good ideas would be appreciated!


Erin - a.k.a. SCARED
  •  

JamesG

People, even young healthy people, keel over and die all the time. Often without sign or warning.  That is "life".

If you have a Dr.'s prescription for a hormone regimen, it is going to be within the accepted bounds for your weight and age.  It is also very conservative, more so than you are going to want.  It should prove to not increase your risk above your baseline potential for disease.  You will also be recommended to do blood testing at regular intervals to see if anything is amiss.

To be aware of the reality of risks is one thing, to be paralyses by them is another...

Good luck whatever you decide to do.
  •  

Sarah Louise

This is the reason you get a prescription from a Doctor. 

You and the Doctor work together to monitor your health.  The Doctor will do blood work on you to monitor your body and how the hormones are affecting it. 

Nameless here for evermore!;  Merely this, and nothing more;
Tis the wind and nothing more!;  Quoth the Raven, "Nevermore!!"
  •  

ErinWDK

Quote from: Sarah Louise on March 21, 2014, 03:52:26 PM
This is the reason you get a prescription from a Doctor. 

You and the Doctor work together to monitor your health.  The Doctor will do blood work on you to monitor your body and how the hormones are affecting it.

In the German Army when someone strongly disagrees with a direct order (s)he will agree to do as commanded with the words "zum Befehl" - literally "at your order."  This may be taken as under strong protest.  My Doctor, particularly my primary care Doctor, is taking this approach.  Yes dosages will be low.  Yes my levels of hormones and other critial things in my blood will be regularly monitored.  However, reading my Doctor's body language he doesn't think this is a good idea at all.  He is competent and thorough...

Is there a decent publication that will help me to assess risk in a quantitative manner?

I will go to the conference.  Then I will see where I go from there.


Erin
  •  

Michelle69

I have not started hrt yet as I have not reached my weight goal. From what my doctor says its easier to lose weight before. I brought the same concerns to my doctor about health risks.

The advice given to me was that most forms of estrogen used are in fact VERY bad for your health. That being said, there are forms of estrogen that are in fact good for your health. They are called, not sure if I remember the correct word here but, bio-identical. This is what I will be taking, one to two months from now, when I start hrt.

Hope this helps.
  •  

Jill F

To minimize the risk, don't take anything other than bioidentical hormones and avoid the pills.  Patches, creams, gels and pellets are the way to go.

I take bioidentical E and P creams and I'm still here after over a year.  ;)
  •  

JamesG

Quote from: ErinWDK on March 21, 2014, 04:06:20 PMHowever, reading my Doctor's body language he doesn't think this is a good idea at all.

Few doctors appreciate when their recommendations and opinions aren't followed.
  •  

Sarah Louise

When push comes to shove, its your decision whether or not the benefits out weigh the risks.

For me the benefits won out, even with my diabetes, age and heart problems.  After many years I'm still here.
Nameless here for evermore!;  Merely this, and nothing more;
Tis the wind and nothing more!;  Quoth the Raven, "Nevermore!!"
  •  

KayXo

#8
BMJ. 2012 Oct 9;345:e6409. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e6409.
Effect of hormone replacement therapy on cardiovascular events in recently postmenopausal women: randomised trial.


Bio-identical estradiol was used in this study. With a progestin in women with a uterus.

"In this randomised trial including 1006 women we found a significantly decreased risk of the composite endpoint of death, heart failure, or myocardial infarction when hormone replacement therapy was started early in postmenopause. The beneficial effect occurred in the 10 years randomisation phase and was maintained for an additional six years of non-randomised follow-up. The trend for all components of the endpoint was in the same direction (figs 3 to 6) and this finding was not associated with an increased risk of cancer, stroke, deep vein thrombosis, or pulmonary embolism. Thus this study implies that hormone therapy started in recently menopausal women and continued for a prolonged duration does not increase or provoke adverse cardiovascular events such as mortality, stroke, heart failure, or myocardial infarction."


"For the subgroup of women who had undergone hysterectomy and who received unopposed 17-β-estradiol/control we found a significant reduction in the combined endpoint of mortality or breast cancer in the treatment group. This is in accordance with findings from the Women's Health Initiative, where 10 739 women who had undergone hysterectomy were randomised to conjugated equine oestrogen or placebo 0.625 mg/day; all women (irrespective of age) in the conjugated equine oestrogen arm experienced a reduced risk of breast cancer (hazard ratio 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.62 to 0.95).35"

"This is the first randomised trial to study healthy women treated early in postmenopause with 17-β-estradiol and norethisterone acetate, and the only study with a 10 year randomised intervention. Additionally the women were followed for a further six years after discontinuation of randomised treatment. Our findings suggest that initiation of hormone replacement therapy in women early after menopause significantly reduces the risk of the combined endpoint of mortality, myocardial infarction, or heart failure. Importantly, early initiation and prolonged hormone replacement therapy did not result in an increased risk of breast cancer or stroke."

The following study from 1998 on 46 male-to-female transsexuals shows that treatment with bio-identical estradiol does not pose risks. 

Arch Sex Behav. 1998 Oct;27(5):475-92.

A follow-up study for estimating the effectiveness of a cross-gender hormone substitution therapy on transsexual patients.


"This follow-up study was carried out to validate the effectiveness of cross-gender hormone therapy embedded in a multistep treatment concept for transsexual patients. This therapy described in detail by the authors elsewhere and presented briefly below provides cross-gender hormone substitution to obtain an assimilation of secondary sex characteristics to the desired sex as quickly as possible. Personal and social background data of 46 male-to-female (M-to-F) and 42 female-to-male (F-to-M) patients passing through different stages of the treatment concept were included. In the Endocrinological Outpatient Clinic of the Max-Planck-Institute/Munich the effectiveness of cross-gender hormone replacement therapy as well as frequency and distribution of side effects were examined by follow-up examination of endocrinological parameters. Cross-gender hormones were administered either parenterally or orally. Blood samples were collected routinely after 2 to 6 months depending on the duration of hormone substitution and complication rate. The incidence of hyperprolactinemia in estrogen-treated M-to-F transsexuals lies in the range of studies published before, whereas the number of patients developing galactorrhea is significantly lower in our patients. The incidence of thromboembolic events during the time of cross-gender hormone treatment in our patients is negligible. Changes in hematological parameters are observed under cross-gender hormone therapy. With the cross-gender hormone regimen performed by us it is possible to generate less side effects in the treatment of transsexual patients than described before."

From full study (I have access), the most common side-effect was high levels of prolactin (24, probably due to Androcur which is known to increase prolactin). There was NO incidence of deep-vein thrombosis or embolism. There was only 1 single case where blood clotting parameters were pathologically (abnormally) altered under high-dose estrogen (not specified how much or if oral vs injected). Hemoglobin (red blood cells) also decreased which is to be expected in 15 of them.

Interestingly, it is noted further in the study that "single case reports of breast cancers...have been reported", not in the study, but in the general literature, which is to say that breast cancer risk is very rare in transsexual women.

This other study also shows that treatment with bio-identical estradiol poses very little risk as compared to non-bioidentical.

Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2005 Dec;113(10):586-92.
Endocrine treatment of male-to-female transsexuals using gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist.

Dittrich R, Binder H, Cupisti S, Hoffmann I, Beckmann MW, Mueller A.
SourceDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erlangen University Hospital, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany


"Sixty male-to-female transsexuals were treated with monthly injections of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) and oral oestradiol-17beta valerate for 2 years to achieve feminisation until SRS. There was a significant decline in gonadotropins, total testosterone and calculated free testosterone. In general, the treatment regimen was well accepted. An equal increase in breast size was achieved compared to common hormone therapy. Two side effects were documented. One, venous thrombosis, occurred in a patient with a homozygous MTHFR mutation. One patient was found to be suffering from symptomatic preexisting gallstones. No other complications were documented. Liver enzymes, lipids, and prolactin levels were unchanged. Significantly increased oestradiol and SHBG serum levels were detectable. In addition, an increase in bone mass density, in the femoral neck and lumbar spine, was recorded. We conclude that cross-sex hormone treatment of male-to-female transsexuals using GnRHa and oestradiol-17beta valerate is effective, and side effects and complication rates can be reduced using the treatment regimen presented here."

The only complications were seen in individuals with preexisting conditions or mutations.

A long-term follow-up study of mortality in transsexuals receiving treatment with cross-sex hormones
Eur J Endocrinol April 1, 2011 164 635-642


"The increased risk of cardiovascular mortality was observed only in those who were still using ethinyl estradiol. No increased risk was found in former users who had changed to other formulations and lower doses of estradiol."

"An increased risk of cardiovascular disease was also reported in women using oral contraceptives (OC), in particular if they used OC pills with a higher ethinyl estradiol content, even more so when they were smokers (21, 22, 23). The increased risk, however, disappeared after discontinuing OC use (24). In those MtF who had continued using ethinyl estradiol, subjects had used equally relatively high doses (...) up to advanced age, which could explain our finding of an increased rate of cardiovascular death."

"The total cancer mortality rate was not increased. The statistically significant increase in mortality rate of lung cancer may be related to heavier smoking in the transsexual population."

""The decreased mortality rate for colon cancer, also observed in the Women's Health Initiative (14), is similarly remarkable"

"We did not observe any cases of breast cancer in the population studied, neither in MtF nor in FtM, in agreement with the low prevalence of breast cancer in the literature."

From The TRANSSEXUAL PHENOMENON
Harry Benjamin, M.D. , 1966

"The fear of developing cancer through hormone treatments crops up from time to time, especially if there are irresponsible newspaper reports, for instance, of the results of someone's experiments with mice and rats to produce cancer artificially with estrogen. Such experiments admittedly have no bearing on the reactions of the human organism. Is the attempt to apply experiments with the cancer-susceptible mouse to the human area anything but ludicrous?" asked Dr. Robert A. Wilson, whose extensive work has thoroughly debunked the cancer fear of women receiving estrogen during their change of life.[5]

In my own clinical material of 152 male transsexuals, 141 of whom were treated with medium to fairly large doses of estrogen, some over several years, no incident of breast or any other cancer was observed. One may argue that these are mostly young men, less apt to develop a malignancy. The experiences of urologists, however, who treated elderly and old men with even much larger doses of estrogen for cancer of the prostate, must then be recalled. With the exception of one disputed case of breast cancer (it may have been a metastasis of the prostatic cancer) reported in the medical literature, no such incident was observed in hundreds if not thousands of cases. In a personal communication from Dr. Elmer Belt, one of the outstanding and most experienced urologists in the country, he said:

    In regard to the taking of Stilbestrol as a cause for cancer of the breast, we have placed several hundred men on this material (I imagine if we were to search our records we would find the number to be in excess of two thousand) and in all of these cases we have not seen a single occurrence of cancer of the breast, although the dosages we used were of a very high level. "

"Finally, and to conclude the discussion of the nonsurgical therapy for transsexuals, it may be most interesting in future years to watch these patients who have received estrogen over a long period of time. Will they be less prone to develop coronary heart disease and other circulatory ailments that go with the process of aging? A wellknown cardiologist, noted for his research in cholesterol metabolism, who had occasion to see a number of transsexuals under estrogen therapy, remarked jokingly, "These people will probably live forever.""
I am not a medical doctor, nor a scientist - opinions expressed by me on the subject of HRT are merely based on my own review of some of the scientific literature over the last decade or so, on anecdotal evidence from women in various discussion forums that I have come across, and my personal experience

On HRT since early 2004
Post-op since late 2005
  •  

JordanBlue

Quote from: ErinWDK on March 21, 2014, 03:35:52 PM
OK, I have a doctor that will prescribe HRT on an informed consent basis.  This doctor has consulted with my primary care doctor and my cardiologist and both agree that I am old enough to make my decisions and they will not stand in the way.  That said they are both concerned about the increased risk of stroke if I go on Estrogen.  My primary care doctor was concerned enough that he had me come into his office and discuss this face to face.  Read this as he was REALLY concerned.

This has scared the fool out of me.  I have no data to assess if the benefit is worth the added risk.  Is there some sort of peer reviewed literature that address this issue (specifically stroke) in a comprehensive matter?  I know a lot has been said here about specifics of Estrogen therapy to minimize risks - the most repeated one is DVT.  DVT might be fatal, a stroke is a lot more likely to be fatal.  If anyone has citations for good references, I have acess to a full University library and I can get them.

I don't particularly want to remain male.  However, I really do not want to die trying to do something about it.  For the moment I am holding off on trying to start HRT.  The one doctor suggested going dressed (I really don't pass by any means) to a local trans conference to get more of an idea of how far down the rabbit hole I might go.  At the moment I am starting to get cold feet on even trying that.  What if I like it?  Would I then be willing to risk horrific complications?  Would that even be sane?

Good ideas would be appreciated!


Erin - a.k.a. SCARED

a lot of factors come into play here here.
what's your age?
do you smoke?
past medical history?
If you have a pretty clean bill of health and don't smoke, chance are he's just trying to talk you out of HRT.  It happens.
Just when the caterpillar thought the world was over, it became a butterfly...
  •  

KayXo

Pharmacology of estrogens and progestogens: influence of different routes of administration, CLIMACTERIC 2005;8(Suppl 1):3–63

"In women with supraphysiological estradiol levels during treatment with implants, no adverse effects on lipid metabolism, but a reduction in LDL cholesterol and fasting insulin were observed150."

Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1978 Aug;18(3):198-201.
The effect of oestradiol valerate therapy on coagulation factors and lipid and oestrogen levels in oöphorectomised women


"The effect of oestradiol valerate on levels of blood cholesterol, triglycerides, free oestradiol and coagulation factors, as well as on urinary oestrogens and free cortisol was measured in 10 oöphorectomised women. Despite the very high urinary oestrogen levles obtained, there was no significant change found in the other parameters during and after treatment."
I am not a medical doctor, nor a scientist - opinions expressed by me on the subject of HRT are merely based on my own review of some of the scientific literature over the last decade or so, on anecdotal evidence from women in various discussion forums that I have come across, and my personal experience

On HRT since early 2004
Post-op since late 2005
  •  

KayXo

#11
J Sex Med. 2013 Dec;10(12):3129-34. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12319. Epub 2013 Sep 9.
Breast cancer development in transsexual subjects receiving cross-sex hormone treatment.


"We researched the occurrence of breast cancer among transsexual persons 18-80 years with an exposure to cross-sex hormones between 5 to >30 years. Our study included 2,307 male-to-female (MtF) transsexual persons undergoing androgen deprivation and estrogen administration (52,370 person-years of exposure)"

"Among MtF individuals one case was encountered, as well as a probable but not proven second case."

"The number of people studied and duration of hormone exposure are limited but it would appear that cross-sex hormone administration does not increase the risk of breast cancer development, in either MtF or FtM transsexual individuals. Breast carcinoma incidences in both groups are comparable to male breast cancers. Cross-sex hormone treatment of transsexual subjects does not seem to be associated with an increased risk of malignant breast development."

Am J Surg Pathol. 2000 Jan;24(1):74-80.
Short-term and long-term histologic effects of castration and estrogen treatment on breast tissue of 14 male-to-female transsexuals in comparison with two chemically castrated men.


"so far, only four cases of breast cancer in male-to-female transsexuals have been documented."

J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008 Jan;93(1):19-25. Epub 2007 Nov 6.
Long-term treatment of transsexuals with cross-sex hormones: extensive personal experience.


"There are two reports of M2F who developed breast carcinomas while receiving estrogen treatment (22, 23). Breast fibroadenomas in M2F receiving hormonal treatment have been observed. In our series of approximately 2200 M2F, cumulative over 30 yr, until recently, no single case of breast cancer had been observed, but there is now one case."
I am not a medical doctor, nor a scientist - opinions expressed by me on the subject of HRT are merely based on my own review of some of the scientific literature over the last decade or so, on anecdotal evidence from women in various discussion forums that I have come across, and my personal experience

On HRT since early 2004
Post-op since late 2005
  •  

ErinWDK

Quote from: JordanBlue on March 21, 2014, 04:58:28 PM
a lot of factors come into play here here.
what's your age?
do you smoke?
past medical history?
If you have a pretty clean bill of health and don't smoke, chance are he's just trying to talk you out of HRT.  It happens.

I am 60 and will be 61 in a few weeks.

I have never smoked.

General heath is an issue, and will be taken account for in setting dosages.

Thanks for all the replies.  I am starting to feel better about eventually going on HRT.  I will go to the conference first to see how I do presenting as me to a (hopefully) friendly audience.


Erin
  •  

KayXo

#13
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 1993 Mar 10;113(7):833-5
Endocrine treatment of prostatic cancer. A renaissance for parenteral
estrogen.


"38 patients have been treated at Huddinge Hospital in Stockholm, and
14 patients at Aker Hospital in Oslo, with polyoestradiol phosphate
(Estradurin) (...) injected intramuscularly every 4th week"

"Plasma testosterone is reduced to castration level after 2-3 weeks. Liver
function, evaluated by the sexual hormone binding globulin level in
plasma, remains unchanged. Morbidity and mortality from cancer are
the same as may be achieved by surgical orchidectomy. The only side
effect of significance is gynaecomastia. Follow-up of the patients
does not indicate any increased risk of thrombosis or cardiovascular
disease."

Prostate 1991;18(2):131-7
Cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in prostatic cancer patients treated
with estrogens or orchiectomy as compared to the standard population.


"Four hundred and seventy-seven prospectively randomized patients with
prostatic carcinoma were treated with a combination of intramuscular
polyestradiol phosphate (PEP) and oral ethinyl estradiol, with
intramuscular PEP alone, or with orchiectomy. The cardiovascular and
all-cause mortality of the two estrogen therapy modalities and
orchiectomy were compared with those of the Finnish male population
in general. The age-standardized rate ratios (approximately relative
risk) for cardiovascular mortality and for all-cause mortality were
1.51 and 2.31 in the combination estrogen therapy group, 0.17 and
1.50 in the PEP monotherapy group
, and 0.78 and 1.78 in the
orchiectomy group
, respectively. Further mortality rates by cause for
all three treatment groups were standardized for age using the
age-specific person-years at risk as standard. Age-standardized
mortality from cardiovascular diseases was very low in the PEP group
,
as compared to other treatment modalities, and the mortality rates
for prostatic cancer were about equal in all three treatment groups.
It is concluded that intramuscular PEP monotherapy is associated with
low cardiovascular mortality
and with an all-cause and prostatic
cancer mortality equal to orchiectomy."

Int J Technol Assess Health Care 1991;7(2):220-5
Cost comparison of parenteral estrogen and conventional hormonal treatment
in patients with prostatic cancer.


"The present study compares the cost of antitumor therapy and adverse
cardiovascular effects during the first year of treatment with oral
estrogens, nonoral estrogens, or surgical castration in patients with
prostatic cancer."

"Twenty-five percent of the patients treated with
oral estrogen suffered cardiovascular complications, compared to none
of the patients treated by orchidectomy or nonoral estrogens."

Prostate 1989;14(4):389-95
Estrogen therapy and liver function--metabolic effects of oral and parenteral
administration.


"Oral estrogen therapy for prostatic cancer is clinically effective
but also accompanied by severe cardiovascular side effects.
Hypertension, venous thromboembolism, and other cardiovascular
disorders are associated with alterations in liver metabolism. The
impact of exogenous estrogens on the liver is dependent on the route
of administration and the type and dose of estrogen.
Oral
administration of synthetic estrogens has profound effects on
liver-derived plasma proteins, coagulation factors, lipoproteins, and
triglycerides, whereas parenteral administration of native estradiol
has very little influence on these aspects of liver function.
"

Prostate 1988;13(3):257-61
Cardiovascular follow-up of patients with prostatic cancer treated with
single-drug polyestradiol phosphate.


"Thirty-eight patients with cancer of the prostate were treated with
strict parenteral estrogen in the form of monthly polyestradiol
phosphate injections(...)in this nonrandomized study.
In contrast to studies with oral estrogens,
there have been no cardiovascular complications at a mean follow-up
of 12.9 +/- 0.7 months (SEM). Twenty-nine of the 38 patients (76%)
have responded to therapy."

Oral estrogens for prostate cancer always include non bio-identical forms such as ethinyl estradiol and diethylbestrol (DES). These affect liver, clotting to a much greater extent than bio-identical estradiol.

Cancer. 2005 Feb 15;103(4):717-23.
Phase II study of transdermal estradiol in androgen-independent
prostate carcinoma


"Oral estrogen therapy has activity in patients with
hormone-naive and androgen-independent prostate carcinoma (AIPC), but
its utility is limited by the associated risk of thromboembolic
toxicity. Parenteral administration may be safer as it avoids "first
pass" liver exposure to estrogen. The authors tested the safety and
efficacy of transdermal estradiol (TDE), as well as the effect of
therapy on hot flashes, sex hormones, the procoagulant cascade, and
bone turnover in patients with AIPC."

"In patients with APIC, TDE was well tolerated and produced a modest
response rate, but was not associated with thromboembolic
complications or clinically important changes in several coagulation
factors."

J Urol. 2003 May;169(5):1735-7.
Transdermal estradiol therapy for advanced prostate cancer--forward
to the past?


"A total of 20 patients with advanced prostate cancer were
enrolled in a before and after study
that examined the impact of estradiol patches on hormones, disease,
thrombophilia, vascular flow, osteoporosis and quality of life.
RESULTS: Median followup is 15 months. Estradiol levels greater than
1,000 pmol./l. were achieved (...) and higher levels were
obtained by increasing the number of patches. All patients achieved
castrate levels of testosterone within 3 weeks and had biochemical
evidence of disease regression. One patient died of disease at 14
months and 1 cardiovascular complication occurred. Thrombophilic
activation was avoided and vascular flow improved. Bone mineral
density was significantly increased. Mild or moderate gynecomastia
occurred in 80% of patients but no patient had hot flushes. All other
functional and symptomatic quality of life domains improved."

J Urol. 2005 Aug;174(2):527-33; discussion 532-3.
Transdermal estradiol therapy for prostate cancer reduces
thrombophilic activation and protects against thromboembolism.


"A total of 20 patients with newly diagnosed locally advanced or metastatic
prostate cancer were treated using transdermal estradiol patches and
the coagulation profile was assessed before and during 12 months
therapy."

"Levels of VIIa and XIIa were unaffected by transdermal estradiol therapy.
Although levels of TAT III were
increased in some patients at 12 months, the increase was markedly
less than that observed historically with equivalent doses of oral
estrogens. Levels of the inhibitory and fibrinolytic factors
including protein C, protein S, APC-R, TPA and PAI-1 remained stable.
Reductions in F1+F2, fibrinogen and D-Dimer levels represented a
normalization from increased levels to the physiological range."

"These results suggest that transdermal estradiol reduces
thrombophilic activation in men with advanced prostate cancer, and
protects against the risk of thrombosis."

In the studies involving use of transdermal estradiol, the dose given was much above what is typically prescribed to transsexual women.

In the studies involving use of injectable estradiol, estradiol levels typically reach...

Prostate. 1989;14(2):183-8.
Single-drug parenteral estrogen treatment in prostatic cancer: a study of two maintenance-dose regimens.


"Treatment of 17 patients with prostatic cancer with (...) polyestradiol phosphate (PEP) as intramuscular injections every fourth week suppressed serum testosterone (T) values to orchidectomy levels within 1 month, and serum estradiol-17 beta (E2) rose to a mean level of 2,456 pmol/liter after 6 months."

And yet, no signs of increased cardiovascular toxicity, no increased risks of thrombosis. In men, with a cancer, at an advanced age.
I am not a medical doctor, nor a scientist - opinions expressed by me on the subject of HRT are merely based on my own review of some of the scientific literature over the last decade or so, on anecdotal evidence from women in various discussion forums that I have come across, and my personal experience

On HRT since early 2004
Post-op since late 2005
  •  

KayXo

According to CLIMACTERIC 2005;8(Suppl 1):3–63

Ethinyl Estradiol suppresses FSH 120 times stronger than bio-identical estradiol. Remember that number. 120

Then, according to this study

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1982 Nov 1;144(5):511-8.

"The synthetic estrogens, diethylstilbestrol and ethinyl estradiol, were relatively more potent on a weight basis for every response and produced the most marked response (fourfold to eighteenfold in excess of their FSH suppression) for the hepatic parameters."

Which means that hepatic (liver) parameters such as clotting factors are affected 4-18 x in excess of the effect they have on FSH.

Therefore, if ethinyl estradiol affects FSH 120 times stronger than bio-identical estradiol and if hepatic parameters are affected 4-18x in excess of FSH effect, this means that ethinyl estradiol affects liver 120 times 4-18x stronger than bio-identical estradiol, in other words, 480-2160 x.

Now, consider that doctors quite easily prescribe birth control pills containing ethinyl estradiol to thousands of millions of women worldwide. Consider that the risk on them is...

The Risks of Oral Contraceptive Pills
Semin Reprod Med. 2001;19(4)


"Given a risk of 1 per 10,000 of VTE in the general population, [23] the estimated attributable risk of oral contraceptives currently used in the United States would be 3 per 10,000."

And that these birth control pills have a much larger effect on coagulation/liver than what we typically take orally.

All this being said, one concludes that DVT risk is quite low on bio-identical estradiol.

This study on transsexuals even remarked...

J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003 Dec;88(12):5723-9.
Venous thrombosis and changes of hemostatic variables during cross-sex hormone treatment in transsexual people.


"CPA-only, td-E(2)+CPA, or oral-E(2)+CPA treatment produced rather small effects on hemostatic variables, whereas oral EE treatment resulted in a large increase in APC resistance from 1.2 +/- 0.8 to 4.1 +/- 1 (P < 0.001), a moderate increase in plasma protein C (9%; P = 0.012), and a large decrease in both total and free plasma protein S (30%; P < 0.005). The large differential effect of oral EE and oral E(2) indicates that the prothrombotic effect of EE is due to its molecular structure rather than to a first-pass liver effect (which they share). Moreover, these differences may explain why M-->F transsexuals treated with oral EE are exposed to a higher thrombotic risk than transsexuals treated with td E(2)."

"Treatment with CPA-only caused mild APC resistance."

"In conclusion, we have shown that treatment of MtF transsexuals with sex steroid hormones (CPA combined with E2 or EE) affects the hemostatic balance with a very pronounced difference in the effects of oral EE compared with the effects of both td E2 or oral E2. Oral EE induces a clinically relevant prothrombotic state."

CPA is cyproterone acetate (Androcur). td E (2) is transdermal estradiol (Estraderm TTS). oral E (2) is oral estradiol valerate (Progynova). EE is ethinyl estradiol.

Also, from

J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012 Dec;97(12):4422-8. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-2030. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
Predictive Markers for Mammoplasty and a Comparison of Side Effect Profiles in Transwomen Taking Various Hormonal Regimens


"Historically, high-dose estrogen in the form
of ethinyloestradiol or conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) was
used to suppress testicular function and induce feminization. In
view of the procoagulant nature of these older estrogens
and the
inability to use plasma estradiol levels to guide treatment, this
protocol was changed in 2004 to oral estradiol valerate"

"Thromboembolism occurred in 1.2% of individuals,
with a statistically significant increase in the incidence of
thromboembolism in those treated with CEE"

CEE is conjugated equine estrogens, not bio-identical.

"Finally, the important safety finding that the incidence
of thromboembolism is 8 times more common with CEE"

I am not a medical doctor, nor a scientist - opinions expressed by me on the subject of HRT are merely based on my own review of some of the scientific literature over the last decade or so, on anecdotal evidence from women in various discussion forums that I have come across, and my personal experience

On HRT since early 2004
Post-op since late 2005
  •  

Sarah Louise

I'm 69 and still going strong, hormones and all.
Nameless here for evermore!;  Merely this, and nothing more;
Tis the wind and nothing more!;  Quoth the Raven, "Nevermore!!"
  •  

KayXo

#16
And finally...

Genetic women have estradiol (the same estradiol we take, bio-identical) coursing through their bodies, for at least 30 years, at levels ranging from 20 to 540 pg/ml (some sources indicate as much as 649 pg/ml) every month, during their menstrual cycle

Am J Med. 1995 Aug;99(2):119-22.
Estrogen acutely increases peripheral blood flow in postmenopausal women.


"normal postmenopausal plasma concentration less than 200 pmol/L (less than 54 pg/ml); normal premenopausal physiologic ranges: luteal 368  to 1,100 pmol/L (100 – 300 pg/ml), midcycle 785 to 1,840 pmol/L (214 – 501 pg/ml), follicular 74 to 368 pmol/L (20 – 100 pg/ml) for estradiol"

Maturitas. 2005 Apr 11;50(4):266-74.
Acute administration of 17beta-estradiol improves endothelium-dependent vasodilation in postmenopausal women.


"Normal concentrations obtained via a fluorometric method, vary with the phase of the woman's menstrual cycle. During the follicular phase, they range from 35 to 184 pg/mL; during the ovulatory phase, from 191 to 540 pg/mL; and during the luteal phase, from 40 to 228 pg/mL; at menopause, the 17β-estradiol level decreases to about 35 pg/mL. »

And at levels ranging from 1,000 to up to 75,000 pg/ml during pregnancy, which some women go through several times during their lifetime...http://cebp.aacrjournals.org/cgi/content-nw/full/12/5/452/T1

and yet, women are no more at an increased risk of dying from health complications versus men. In fact, women are less likely to be affected by coronary heart disease than men due to estradiol's cardioprotective effects

Volume 15 Suppl 38, 1983, Pages 1-121
Blood pressure and hemodynamics in postmenopausal women during estradiol-17 beta substitution.


"Estradiol-17 beta substitution decreased the systolic and diastolic blood pressure in normotensive, hypertensive and borderline hypertensive postmenopausal women."

"Irrespective of the pretreatment blood pressure levels, heart rate decreased during estradiol-17 beta substitution"

"Estradiol-17 beta substitution caused an increase in the blood volume in all groups of postmenopausal women"

"Cardiac output increased in the normotensive test subjects but decreased in the hypertensive and borderline hypertensive subjects"

J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2011 Mar;111(3):153-64.
Bioidentical hormones: an evidence-based review for primary care providers.


"17β-Estradiol is FDA approved for menopausal symptoms, may have cardioprotective effects, and may have fewer adverse effects on blood pressure than conjugated equine estrogens."

"Bioidentical hormones that are approved by the FDA may be preferred over standard hormone replacement because of their physiologic benefits and safety profile."

Volume 64, Number 1
OBSTETRICAL AND GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY
Copyright © 2009
by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Physiological Changes Associated with the Menstrual Cycle
A Review


"Peripheral vascular resistance is negatively correlated with circulating levels of estradiol, indicating that estradiol may exert a protective influence by alterations of peripheral microvasculature (46)."
I am not a medical doctor, nor a scientist - opinions expressed by me on the subject of HRT are merely based on my own review of some of the scientific literature over the last decade or so, on anecdotal evidence from women in various discussion forums that I have come across, and my personal experience

On HRT since early 2004
Post-op since late 2005
  •  

JordanBlue

Quote from: ErinWDK on March 21, 2014, 05:06:18 PM
I am 60 and will be 61 in a few weeks.

I have never smoked.

General heath is an issue, and will be taken account for in setting dosages.

Thanks for all the replies.  I am starting to feel better about eventually going on HRT.  I will go to the conference first to see how I do presenting as me to a (hopefully) friendly audience.


Erin

DVT is not a huge risk on HRT if you don't smoke.  I'm 59 and certainly not in perfect health.  I'm on week 10 of HRT with no problems.
Just when the caterpillar thought the world was over, it became a butterfly...
  •  

Eva Marie

Well, I have actually HAD a stroke before. I discussed what happened with my endo and what they found and what treatment I was on to keep me from having another one. That was good enough from him and I'm on the full tilt boogie strength of HRT now. The last I checked I'm still alive :)
  •  

Virginia

The difficult choice doctors must make in recommending any treatment protocol is whether  the benefits outweigh the risks for the individual patient. What may be lifesaving for one person may lead to the death of another. We rely on our doctor's experience and objective third party opinion to weigh the pros & cons to decide what is in each of our best interest. The males in my family have an extremely HIGH risk of heart attack. My OBGYN explained that for me, the small risk associated with estrogen hormone therapy would be more than outweighed by the huge DECREASE in risk women experience compared to men BECAUSE of estrogen.

I am 53, have been on a full transition level estrogen regimen for 4+ years. I lost 2 cousins in their 40's due to heart problems, 2 other under doctors care for problems in their 50's. At 5'10" 146 pounds, I am healthy as a horse half my age. It seems that for me, my doctor made a very good call on the best interest of his patient.
~VA (pronounced Vee- Aye, the abbreviation for the State of Virginia where I live)
  •