[Before I post this, if qwlmp is still looking at private stuff, Dr Lorimer has started practicing again, which means that GenderCare is back to normal.]
In my opinion there are pros and cons for both countries.]
Quote from: __________ on April 22, 2014, 09:01:10 PM
So consensus from the Brits would be that it's probably better (easier?) to transition in the United States?
In the States it seems that people have more control over when and how they transition. You can go to a therapist in your own time, or even get T on an informed consent basis (which I love the idea of). It's in your hands, but it does mean that you need the money for it, although from the sounds of it there are places which use a sliding scale and make T more accessible for people. Here we have little control over the timescales, depending on where you are in the country and how far you can afford to travel it could take months or a year just to see someone at a GIC, unless you have the money to go private.
There is also the issue here, which is more of a problem for some people who can't pass without hormones, that they require you to do 6 months of RLE before considering you for T. Even at the private clinics they prefer you to have done something towards socially transitioning, like changing your name. If you don't pass that means being outed to almost everyone that you meet, which isn't something I'd be comfortable doing, but fortunately I seem to pass, even if it is as a thirteen year old boy. Basically, you have to play their game and do things in the way that they want you to do it and there's not much you can do about that. I'm jealous of Americans seemingly having more control over how and when they do things.
Going private here is something that I think a lot of the demographic would really struggle to do, and personally I wouldn't be able to lay that amount of money down on a regular basis. It's good that it's there for the people who can afford it, but it's unfair that so many people are forced to paying for a service that they should be able to get free just because the NHS services are so over stretched in this area of healthcare. We've already paid for it through our taxes, yet people are paying again to go privately.
But it is free - or as free as it can be while paying taxes - and that's something that you can't complain about. Sure, the surgeons aren't always perfect, there's one or maybe two that I'd consider going to right now, and one of those isn't fully NHS, but it's something that I would have to be saving up for a lot longer than the year the NHS requires you to have been doing RLE for to afford it. Bottom surgery is covered as well, and that's something that is seriously expensive, especially in the States where almost everything to do with healthcare seems ridiculously overinflated.
The NHS isn't perfect, but it does get you there in the end. I'm happy that there's a service that's as good as free, but I just wish that it didn't take so long, they're so rigid, and that how it worked was better understood within the medical community. Just today I heard about three cases of people struggling to get their GPs to write their referrals, and that's something that shouldn't happen, but unfortunately it does. The right hand doesn't know what the left's doing and all that.
If you can afford it America seems great. If you can't the UK will get you there...
eventually. A mixture of the two would be perfect. I have to say that we do have the monopoly on socially transitioning though, I feel for all you guys every time someone mentions going to court to get their name changed, or putting out a newspaper ad.
Sorry for the essay, I'm procrastinating on sleeping.