In researching doctors, I've pretty much narrowed it down to Dr. Bart and Dr. Di Maggio. I've been researching these doctors' credentials, including board certifications. I was happy to find out that Dr. Di Maggio has many board certs, including the international chapter of the International Society of Esthetic Plastic Surgery (ISEPS). But I couldn't find any information regarding board certifications for Dr. Bart Van de Ven? Does anyone know whether or not he is board certified in his country? Di Maggio's office did email me this:
Dear Michelle,
Hope you read the info regarding MDM board certification...from the official Argentine Society SACPER, he is Full and Titular member and for the International Society...ISAPS, he is a Full and Titular member. So the answer is YES, MDM is Board Certificate.
Also in our website (mdmsurgery) you can read very clear the info and if you need to cheek this just go to :
www.sacper.org.ar....Buenos Aires.....
http://www.isaps.org/find-a-surgeon/search?name=di+maggio
Please be carefully with the information that you wrote in foros or public places regarding us, because could create confusion.
If you posted any info regarding MDM please, we appreciate that you clarify the information you have posted on forums or other publicweb places.
Thank you.
MDM & TeamBut I'm a little worried about having such surgery (Full FFS) in another country. It's not a question about whether the surgeons are good, but rather the standards in terms of cleanliness, disease control, etc. It really does concern me. I does seem like they "patrol" these message boards, too, which seems like questionable behavior to me.
Dr. DiMaggio's office also emailed me some "Information Before Surgery," and this part regarding the containment of blood concerns me for obvious reasons:
Two other medical conditions that make a patient is not considered suitable for facial feminization surgery with Dr. Di Maggio: HIV and hepatitis C or B (this last article, depending on the viral load). This is because in order to reshape the facial bones used electric saws and drills high speed, and this kind of goodbye instrumental micro particles of bone and blood out of the wound with great force, reaching remote areas and even passing through minimum interstices in other operations would not be penetrated. To the medical team working around the patient, this implies a very high risk of infection.I bolded the portion that I'm most concerned about (also, the language translation isn't the best, which makes reading some of what they write confusing). I'm trying to reconcile his reputation as a great surgeon with the physical conditions of the surgery itself (standards of cleanliness, sterilization, etc.). This makes any decision difficult. It needs to be carefully weighed.
Does anyone have any clarification on this? Especially regarding the way their medical facilities help to contain disease and infection?