Susan's Place Logo

News:

Visit our Discord server  and Wiki

Main Menu

ID laws could disenfranchise trans* voters in ten states

Started by skin, September 09, 2014, 01:34:36 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

skin

The Williams Institute Press Release
September 9, 2014

LOS ANGELES — Ten states' strict voter ID laws may create substantial barriers to voting and possible disenfranchisement for more than 24,000 transgender voters this November. According to a new study entitled, "The Potential Impact of Voter Identification Laws on Transgender Voters in the 2014 General Election," authored by the Williams Institute's Jody L. Herman, Ph.D., Peter J. Cooper Public Policy Fellow, many transgender people who have transitioned do not have identification that accurately reflects their correct gender.
"Lawmakers should not overlook the consequences of enacting stricter voter ID laws on transgender voters," said Herman. "Election officials must consider the potential impact of these laws in the upcoming November elections. Voter ID laws create a unique barrier for transgender people who would otherwise be eligible to vote."

Across the ten strict photo ID states, about 84,000 transgender people who have transitioned are estimated to be eligible to vote. The 24,000 transgender voters who may face barriers to voting reside in the following ten states that will have or could have in place strict photo ID laws for the November 2014 general election: Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Mississippi, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and Wisconsin.

An estimated twenty-eight percent of the transgender voting-eligible population in those ten states has no identification or records that accurately reflect their gender. Transgender people of color, youth, students, people with low incomes, and people with disabilities are likely overrepresented in that group.

In order for these 24,000 voting-eligible transgender people to obtain the updated IDs required to vote in the November 2014 general election, they must comply with the requirements for updating their state-issued or federally-issued IDs. These requirements vary widely by state or federal agency and can be difficult and costly to meet.

"Some voters may not have the means or the ability to present the required voter identification for a variety of reasons, such as poverty, disability, or religious objection. Transgender people have unique barriers to obtaining accurate IDs needed to vote. As these ten states begin planning for their fall elections, educating poll workers is crucial in order to ensure that transgender voters in their states have fair access to the ballot," said Herman.

The full voter ID study can be accessed at: williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/voter-id-laws-september-2014.pdf .


About the Williams Institute

The Williams Institute on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Law and Public Policy advances law and public policy through rigorous, independent research and scholarship, and disseminates its work through a variety of education programs and media to judges, legislators,lawyers, other policy makers, and the public. A national think tank at UCLA Law, the Williams Institute produces high quality research with real-world relevance. For more information, go to:williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/.
"Choosing to be true to one's self — despite challenges that may come with the journey — is an integral part of realizing not just one's own potential, but of realizing the true nature of our collective human spirit. This spirit is what makes us who we are, and by following that spirit as it manifests outwardly, and inwardly, you are benefiting us all." -Andrew WK
  •  

Jill F

Before my legal name change, my old ID showed a fat guy with a beard.  My ID was useless.  In CA, you don't need to show an ID at the polling place, but you do still have to tell them who you are.  I didn't think it was anyone's damned business, so I did the absentee ballot thing to circumvent this.
  •  

skin

My state has a voter ID law, but it is currently in the courts.  The state is pushing hard to have it in place in time for November.  A law was also passed allowing election observers to stand as close as 3 ft to voters as they giver their information and receive their ballot.  By election day, I will have been on HRT for 6 months with a completely boy mode ID.  My state has a very combative political environment right now, so there will certainly be a handful of observers their ready to challenge/intimidate every voter.  If the voter ID law is upheld I cannot imagine voting in person.
"Choosing to be true to one's self — despite challenges that may come with the journey — is an integral part of realizing not just one's own potential, but of realizing the true nature of our collective human spirit. This spirit is what makes us who we are, and by following that spirit as it manifests outwardly, and inwardly, you are benefiting us all." -Andrew WK
  •  

pebbles

The purpose of these laws is explicitly to persecute minorities.
  •  

Jill F

Quote from: pebbles on September 10, 2014, 01:55:08 PM
The purpose of these laws is explicitly to persecute minorities.

'Cuz 'Murica is fer straight, white, affluent cismen to rule.  If y'ain't all of the above, then y'ain't a real 'Murican.

/sarc
  •  

ZoeM

Quote from: pebbles on September 10, 2014, 01:55:08 PM
The purpose of these laws is explicitly to persecute minorities.
That's some conspiracy theory you got there. It's simultaneously completely lacking in any sort of evidence and an accusation of racism levied against roughly half the nation.

Over on the other side of the fence (y'know, the side of the fence proposing this legislation), the *purpose* of this legislation is to prevent fraud. Disenfranchisement of anybody is at worst an unwanted side effect. (That said, there needs to be legislation in the voter ID setup to allow transitioners to bring some sort of evidence of their transition, EG a doctor's note, along with the photo ID that may no longer match their appearance. Or just have the polling booth accept any combination of paperwork that'll let you on an airplane)

But let's not let the truth get in the way of our political blame game/hate-fest. Go on - stereotype and accuse all you want.
Don't lose who you are along the path to who you want to be.








  •  

skin

Quote from: ZoeM on September 10, 2014, 02:31:15 PM
Disenfranchisement of anybody is at worst an unwanted side effect.

When the side effect is worse than the problem, you have to really wonder what the purpose of the treatment is.
"Choosing to be true to one's self — despite challenges that may come with the journey — is an integral part of realizing not just one's own potential, but of realizing the true nature of our collective human spirit. This spirit is what makes us who we are, and by following that spirit as it manifests outwardly, and inwardly, you are benefiting us all." -Andrew WK
  •  

Jill F

Quote from: ZoeM on September 10, 2014, 02:31:15 PM
That's some conspiracy theory you got there. It's simultaneously completely lacking in any sort of evidence and an accusation of racism levied against roughly half the nation.

Over on the other side of the fence (y'know, the side of the fence proposing this legislation), the *purpose* of this legislation is to prevent fraud. Disenfranchisement of anybody is at worst an unwanted side effect. (That said, there needs to be legislation in the voter ID setup to allow transitioners to bring some sort of evidence of their transition, EG a doctor's note, along with the photo ID that may no longer match their appearance. Or just have the polling booth accept any combination of paperwork that'll let you on an airplane)

But let's not let the truth get in the way of our political blame game/hate-fest. Go on - stereotype and accuse all you want.

OK, I see what point you're making, but would you like to be turned away from the polls or have to out yourself in order to vote?  In some places there are serious safety issues when you do this.  Not everyone accepts us, and we are disproportionally victims of violence because of who we are.
  •  

suzifrommd

Quote from: ZoeM on September 10, 2014, 02:31:15 PM
Over on the other side of the fence (y'know, the side of the fence proposing this legislation), the *purpose* of this legislation is to prevent fraud.

Is fraud a problem? Has anyone ever identified an election that was decided because of voter fraud?

What makes me suspicious about the whole voter ID issue is that the folks who are proposing it are the very folks who scream bloody murder about government waste and about expensive solutions to unimportant problems.

That makes me wonder whether this isn't all about power. A few really wealthy folks wanting to tip the political playing field their way by whatever method they can get away with.
Have you read my short story The Eve of Triumph?
  •  

Amy The Bookworm

#9
Quote from: ZoeM on September 10, 2014, 02:31:15 PM
That's some conspiracy theory you got there. It's simultaneously completely lacking in any sort of evidence and an accusation of racism levied against roughly half the nation.

Over on the other side of the fence (y'know, the side of the fence proposing this legislation), the *purpose* of this legislation is to prevent fraud. Disenfranchisement of anybody is at worst an unwanted side effect. (That said, there needs to be legislation in the voter ID setup to allow transitioners to bring some sort of evidence of their transition, EG a doctor's note, along with the photo ID that may no longer match their appearance. Or just have the polling booth accept any combination of paperwork that'll let you on an airplane)

But let's not let the truth get in the way of our political blame game/hate-fest. Go on - stereotype and accuse all you want.


It may be an unintended outcome of the new laws (because they're made by people with little to no legal background who don't understand the full ramifications of the laws they're making ... except when that's not the case and they do, and they just don't care) but when the problems are pointed out with such laws, conservative state governments do absolutely nothing to remedy the situation, and some (Like Governor Sam Brownback in Kansas) are actually happy about it and remind officials around the state after this becomes a known problem to remember not to change the gender of trans people on their birth certificates, because that's his administration's policy regardless of if someone has a court order saying they can change their gender. This has been a known issue for quite some time and many organizations have made a point of saying as much to the state government here. Given Sam's background on LGBT views, his response is never a surprise.

This is the same guy who blocked the confirmation of federal judicial nominee Janet T. Neff because she had attended a same-sex commitment ceremony and he still supports the sodomy laws on the books, meaning that because of him, technically, it's still illegal to be a homosexual in this state despite the supreme court striking down such laws in 2003 (and by what you must be thinking is coincidence, most of the states listed in the main article also have such laws). You're going to try to tell me that this isn't something he wants, or that we're just being paranoid? LGBT people that live in these states say this stuff and worry a great deal because this is reality for us.

... So it's not about singling minorities out ... until it is.

Luckily for me, I was born in Texas, so this isn't a problem for m- ... oh, wait. The state of Texas does the exact same thing.

So yeah, I think you're right. These guys do this unintentionally, but what you don't seem to understand is that when it's pointed out to them, they swerve to make it policy like a red neck shifting lanes to run over a racoon on the high way. They do it because they can, and in the states they run for office in, few will challenge or question it because the majority in these places agree with this view and thus, such a stance from such politicians actually earns them votes, so they get away with it too.

Go ahead, take a look at the list of states again:

Quote from: skin on September 09, 2014, 01:34:36 PM
Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Indiana, Kansas, Mississippi, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and Wisconsin.

These aren't exactly places known for progressive thinking or exactly embracing LGBT people in any way shape or form. Most I know for sure have anti LGBT laws on the books without even looking it up.


Welcome to conservative America!


I can't wait until I can leave this damn state.
  •  

Jera

Quote from: ZoeM on September 10, 2014, 02:31:15 PM
That's some conspiracy theory you got there. It's simultaneously completely lacking in any sort of evidence and an accusation of racism levied against roughly half the nation.

Over on the other side of the fence (y'know, the side of the fence proposing this legislation), the *purpose* of this legislation is to prevent fraud. Disenfranchisement of anybody is at worst an unwanted side effect. (That said, there needs to be legislation in the voter ID setup to allow transitioners to bring some sort of evidence of their transition, EG a doctor's note, along with the photo ID that may no longer match their appearance. Or just have the polling booth accept any combination of paperwork that'll let you on an airplane)

But let's not let the truth get in the way of our political blame game/hate-fest. Go on - stereotype and accuse all you want.

That's the purpose politicians claim when they push this kind of crap, but how real is it? The words politicians say are virtually never what they actually mean.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/voter-fraud-real-rare/story?id=17213376

http://www.politifact.com/georgia/statements/2012/sep/19/naacp/-person-voter-fraud-very-rare-phenomenon/ (-cites ten actual, documented cases... ten, out of millions of votes, within the past decade. Is that enough to push expensive legislation?)

Then we've got politicians like this, who are actually honest about some things:

http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2014/09/09/3565073/georgia-senator-early-voting-suppression/

So while I don't think we're actually the direct target here, it definitely affects us too. Even so, it's not some unfounded, blanket conspiracy theory that these people are trying to stop certain people from voting altogether, not just to prevent fraud.

  •  

Miss_Bungle1991

My state is one of the batch. Meh..I don't care. I have no problems with my I.D since its had both my revised legal name and revised gender marker for a while now. Plus, I have no desire to participate in the charade that is our political system anymore so, meh....
  •  

pebbles

Quote from: ZoeM on September 10, 2014, 02:31:15 PM
That's some conspiracy theory you got there. It's simultaneously completely lacking in any sort of evidence and an accusation of racism levied against roughly half the nation.

Over on the other side of the fence (y'know, the side of the fence proposing this legislation), the *purpose* of this legislation is to prevent fraud. Disenfranchisement of anybody is at worst an unwanted side effect. (That said, there needs to be legislation in the voter ID setup to allow transitioners to bring some sort of evidence of their transition, EG a doctor's note, along with the photo ID that may no longer match their appearance. Or just have the polling booth accept any combination of paperwork that'll let you on an airplane)

But let's not let the truth get in the way of our political blame game/hate-fest. Go on - stereotype and accuse all you want.

TRUTH YA YA BLAH

Except sheer statistics show that voter fraud is a non-issue, reported cases are like 1 every 2 years, and it's not surprising because there's basically no incentive to a criminal vote 10 times.
It's not like they get money for it compared to say investing there energies in stealing cars instead.

I can find like 1 Case in databases for this thing for that state.
http://votingrights.news21.com/interactive/election-fraud-database/

So a subset of lawmakers who only represent a subset of "Idealized" voters, rather than deal with backlash from everyone else would rather silence everyone else.

They quietly admit it anyway.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/08/28/republicans-admit-voter-id-laws-are-aimed-at-democratic-voters.html
  •