I'm so happy this is happening. I've already been saving to buy their prosthetic... Might have to get this first if it comes out soon enough!

Quote from: aleon515 on August 13, 2014, 01:00:27 AM
Yeah it looks a bit different, though I'm not sure why? I didn't notice the drip lip or whatever, but not sure I notice the "lack of it" either.

I wouldn't hold my breath for an uncut, their models seem to be cut, for whatever  reason (perhaps buddies of theirs').

Isn't the basic packer 9.2 oz? not sure. They said they were trying to find lighter ways of making their prosthetics (in Philly).

--Jay

I was at the conference too and also overheard them talking about the weight...I believe at the time they said it was on par with their 8" model (just over 14oz), and they were going to try to reduce the weight. This product was larger than their basic Packer (packer is 4.5", and the STP is 5" with slightly larger balls). I had a chance to hold it and it had a little bit of weight to it, but not so much that it wouldn't stay on. I know some guys that adhere their 8"model with the extra strength adhesive and they said it holds on well even during sex. I have their 6" prosthetic and never had any trouble with it staying on.

The thing looked amazing and felt just as good as their other products...it blows every other STP out of the water in looks alone, and if the design works as well as it appears to it WILL be the ultimate STP:) Their design looked flawless...very smooth and professionally done. I don't think they had the lip on it at the conference, and it does look like they tweaked the design a bit. I'll be ordering one as soon as they are for sale...can't wait to try it out! I'll do a review too...I don't mind being a guinea pig:)

Quote from: Nygeel on August 12, 2014, 08:03:31 PM
I like it but I hope there's an intact (uncut) version.

Joining the "uncut" club!

I actually emailed RM a while back asking whether they'd be able to modify an existing model to include a foreskin. They said that they couldn't make the modification but that they were considering and/or planning uncut models in the future. They couldn't give me any more information than that, though.

SO EXCITED!!!! I just got a great new job and wanted to finally save up for a Reelmagik, I want this!!

I really really like this, but I definitely want to know the "learning curve" on the STP part. The Peacock for me was a joke. I wish I'd never bought it. I'm not looking for something for play really, but solely packing and STP without the medicine spoon or the nipple style because for the freaking life of me I cannot get either to work. :p

I really would like to just walk into a bathroom and not worry about pulling my STP out of my pocket, as well as drips coming from it when I'm done using the restroom. It doesn't really "shake off" very well :p

One of the guys I know said they had asked reelmagik about the pricing for the new STP and may be in the $700-$800 range, which I'd definitely be willing to pay for the realism and the functionality. Personally I thought they would have been over $1000, so this is good news to me if it's true!

Quote from: Codyboy1989 on September 01, 2014, 12:28:56 PM
One of the guys I know said they had asked reelmagik about the pricing for the new STP and may be in the $700-$800 range, which I'd definitely be willing to pay for the realism and the functionality. Personally I thought they would have been over $1000, so this is good news to me if it's true!

That's crazy.  It is pretty much the same product as their prosthetic, but with a hole in it.  I would never consider spending that much.  I assumed it would be about the same ($499), or less, actually.  I can't see myself paying any more than that, simply based on principle.  They know the community really needs this STP, and are counting on them, I hope they don't take advantage of that (ok...ok...so maybe I am forgetting the point of a for profit business, I am just saying I don't think that would be a fair price, based on what they currently offer).

I absolutely agree with Brett if that price is true.

Just because it's for profit, doesn't mean they should gouge trans guys for this. They can make a fair profit *and* make a good product, and if they can't do that they shouldn't put it out there. From what I saw it should be in the $500 range. I believe it isn't quite as realistic as the other prosthetics (perhaps not the same number of layers) but with an STP.

--Jay

Quote from: Brett on September 01, 2014, 07:30:49 PM
That's crazy.  It is pretty much the same product as their prosthetic, but with a hole in it.  I would never consider spending that much.  I assumed it would be about the same ($499), or less, actually.  I can't see myself paying any more than that, simply based on principle.  They know the community really needs this STP, and are counting on them, I hope they don't take advantage of that (ok...ok...so maybe I am forgetting the point of a for profit business, I am just saying I don't think that would be a fair price, based on what they currently offer).

Quote from: aleon515 on September 02, 2014, 12:10:25 AM
Just because it's for profit, doesn't mean they should gouge trans guys for this. They can make a fair profit *and* make a good product, and if they can't do that they shouldn't put it out there. From what I saw it should be in the $500 range. I believe it isn't quite as realistic as the other prosthetics (perhaps not the same number of layers) but with an STP.

--Jay

I agree with you Jay.  I also thought that it didn't seem/feel quite as realistic as the flaccid, but assumed I was incorrect, and that it was made the exact same.  Plus, I was conscious of the fact that it was just a prototype.  Knowing if the number of layers is the same as the flaccid is an excellent point, and it should be priced accordingly.  Important question.

It lacks some of the skin quality that the regular flaccid one. The realism is good but doesn't blow me away. Another thing that I heard that they said that it would take less time to get this one as opposed to the regular one. I think i read that here and didn't hear that in Philly. If so, it may be it is fewer layers are easier to make. Okay it could be 7 vs 15 or something. But I believe each layer has detail and color added, so a few less layers decreases realism. But for an STP it  has excellent realism. Just compare to the FreeTom.

--Jay

Quote from: Brett on September 02, 2014, 09:45:21 AM
I agree with you Jay.  I also thought that it didn't seem/feel quite as realistic as the flaccid, but assumed I was incorrect, and that it was made the exact same.  Plus, I was conscious of the fact that it was just a prototype.  Knowing if the number of layers is the same as the flaccid is an excellent point, and it should be priced accordingly.  Important question.

Quote from: aleon515 on September 02, 2014, 02:18:13 PM
It lacks some of the skin quality that the regular flaccid one. The realism is good but doesn't blow me away. Another thing that I heard that they said that it would take less time to get this one as opposed to the regular one. I think i read that here and didn't hear that in Philly. If so, it may be it is fewer layers are easier to make. Okay it could be 7 vs 15 or something. But I believe each layer has detail and color added, so a few less layers decreases realism. But for an STP it  has excellent realism. Just compare to the FreeTom.

--Jay

Yes Jay your are right. I was told that from them saying it would take less time.

Quote from: aleon515 on September 02, 2014, 02:18:13 PM
It lacks some of the skin quality that the regular flaccid one. The realism is good but doesn't blow me away. Another thing that I heard that they said that it would take less time to get this one as opposed to the regular one. I think i read that here and didn't hear that in Philly. If so, it may be it is fewer layers are easier to make. Okay it could be 7 vs 15 or something. But I believe each layer has detail and color added, so a few less layers decreases realism. But for an STP it  has excellent realism. Just compare to the FreeTom.

--Jay

I have to say I disagree...the realism did blow me away. They look just as realistic as their other products, which is much more realistic than any other product on the market. The outer skin wasn't as pliable, but that might have something to do with the STP function. The scrotum was still the same as their other prosthetics...very soft with movable testicles inside. As far as I know, no other STP has movable testicles, or anywhere near as much detail. Hopefully the price will be lower than what I heard but I'm still eager to get one...so far it looks like the best STP available.

Perhaps an inaccurate way of saying that it doesn't have as many layers. I was thinking this was NOT in texture. I think it still has very many layers. It's not a 1-5 layer thing whatsoever. Just my impression of course. But I was going somewhat on the statement that it would take less time to order.

--Jay

Quote from: Codyboy1989 on September 02, 2014, 03:17:16 PM
I have to say I disagree...the realism did blow me away. They look just as realistic as their other products, which is much more realistic than any other product on the market. The outer skin wasn't as pliable, but that might have something to do with the STP function. The scrotum was still the same as their other prosthetics...very soft with movable testicles inside. As far as I know, no other STP has movable testicles, or anywhere near as much detail. Hopefully the price will be lower than what I heard but I'm still eager to get one...so far it looks like the best STP available.

They just announced the release date and price...it's gonna be available on October 30. Priced at $529...much less than I originally heard and was anticipating!

I emailed RM about the features...it seems that they are using the same multi-layer process for coloration as they do on their Advanced FTM Models, and the same multi-layer silicone process for the scrotum and testicles, except that the testicles are a bit softer and lighter than the other products. Their 4.5" Prosthetic with these same features would cost $659, the 6" model would be $689, so it still falls cheaper than those products. The only thing it's missing is the movable foreskin...I'm betting that with the STP functionality it just didn't make sense on the shaft, maybe due to structural issues with the urine flow (collapsing too easily if it's too soft?). Just my guess. Still seems like a good price for the quality and function. Excited!

Well all I can say is I just got a job, will be paid weekly, and am definitely buying this bad boy! Fact is, for me, I'm young and still attending high school. I need something that I don't have to carry around as high school teens can be nosy when trying to joke around and may discover something I don't want them to!

Also I have no time to take something out of my pocket, stick it in place/on, use it, shake off, remove/take off, put back wherever, and STILL make it to class on time. Also causes issues in track so hopefully an adhesive will help remove the unnecessary effort!

Basically, I know it ain't gonna be perfect but it's close enough! I'm already having me up money for it and hopefully will have it when I go to MPLS or SCSU. I wanna finally be able to bravely walk into the mens room and use a urinal. I already do when I gotta release a demon but I wanna a river someday!

Wow I'm EXTREMELY excited! I'm shaking. Great now I can't sleep 

I spoke with Reel Magik and they told me the weight this time.  13oz.  For comparison, the flaccid prosthetic and basic packer are 9.2oz.  The 6 inch erects are 11.0 oz (with flex rod)/11.2 oz (without flex rod).

Quote from: Brett on October 10, 2014, 05:23:56 PM
I spoke with Reel Magik and they told me the weight this time.  13oz.  For comparison, the flaccid prosthetic and basic packer are 9.2oz.  The 6 inch erects are 11.0 oz (with flex rod)/11.2 oz (without flex rod).

*HEAVY*!!!

--Jay

Quote from: aleon515 on October 10, 2014, 05:52:27 PM
*HEAVY*!!!

--Jay

Whoa. Heavy is right.. the weight was the only issue that's really turned me off from RM products in the past.

Quote from: Maleth on October 10, 2014, 06:50:18 PM
Whoa. Heavy is right.. the weight was the only issue that's really turned me off from RM products in the past.

I know.  I wrote them back to confirm that I understood them correctly and to understand why it is so heavy.  They explained the reasons for the higher weight than the flaccid is:

*The shaft is just over 5inches (flaccid, as we know is 4.5)
*The shaft is "slightly thicker"
*The scrotum is larger to account for the STP

Sooo, that's the way it is, fellas.