I was told that their releasesing the smaller stp version this week, lets see how well they make this one I just hope it packs right considering its 5'5 inches they have potential though.

5.5 inches is still quite a large package for flaccid (average guy is 3 to 3 1/2 flaccid).

--Jay

Quote from: aleon515 on November 27, 2014, 11:02:10 PM
5.5 inches is still quite a large package for flaccid (average guy is 3 to 3 1/2 flaccid).

--Jay

Its not that bigger than the packer I have know I measured because I was alittle iffy on the size but I mean not everyone has the same size some bigger than others but who knows.

Quote from: aleon515 on November 27, 2014, 11:02:10 PM
5.5 inches is still quite a large package for flaccid (average guy is 3 to 3 1/2 flaccid).

--Jay

Its not just a packer, its a 3 in 1

Yes, it's a difficult problem to get a packer/prosthetic to have two sizes. It can be done, but it's MUCH more expensive!!

--Jay

Quote from: Brandon on November 28, 2014, 09:54:03 AM
Its not just a packer, its a 3 in 1

Quote from: aleon515 on November 28, 2014, 05:12:39 PM
Yes, it's a difficult problem to get a packer/prosthetic to have two sizes. It can be done, but it's MUCH more expensive!!

--Jay

Yea I guess this one is going to have an erection rod though.

Most of the erection rods just serve to make the packer, for lack of a nicer word, "hard" versus also making it longer. It can actually be done, but it isn't something for a under $200 item.

--Jay

Quote from: Brandon on November 29, 2014, 10:50:46 AM
Yea I guess this one is going to have an erection rod though.

Quote from: aleon515 on November 29, 2014, 12:44:29 PM
Most of the erection rods just serve to make the packer, for lack of a nicer word, "hard" versus also making it longer. It can actually be done, but it isn't something for a under $200 item.

--Jay

I know but with the erection rod it might be more packable rather than without. Kinda like peecock.

I'm guessing so. Good luck.

--Jay

Quote from: Brandon on November 29, 2014, 01:15:42 PM
I know but with the erection rod it might be more packable rather than without. Kinda like peecock.

They are sending me one as soon as they release them, I'll let you guys know about it as soon as I receive it.

I just checked their site and it looks like they added a few new models, they look pretty good from the pics.. anyway I emailed them and they said the 5.5 won't actually be out for a few more weeks but did inform me they just released a 3.5 3 n 1  so I'm thinking about getting it.. I'll let you all know how it is when I get it.

I think they may send me one before they release them, so I'll let you all know.

Quote from: erika.s on December 02, 2014, 08:23:44 PM
I just checked their site and it looks like they added a few new models, they look pretty good from the pics.. anyway I emailed them and they said the 5.5 won't actually be out for a few more weeks but did inform me they just released a 3.5 3 n 1  so I'm thinking about getting it.. I'll let you all know how it is when I get it.

They realeased a 3.5 3 in 1?

3.5 inches sounds way short for a 3 in 1. I believe even for an STP a 3.5 is pushing it.

--Jay

Quote from: aleon515 on December 02, 2014, 10:42:22 PM
3.5 inches sounds way short for a 3 in 1. I believe even for an STP a 3.5 is pushing it.

--Jay

Well who knows it might work for both aspects. After all a womans vagina is really not that deep and the g spot is on the upper wall,but man first you were complaning about the 5'5 being to big know your complaing about this bing to small it might just work for some who knows, I might try it because I am not trying to walk around with a snake in my pants when I go to school everyday.

If you look at the cup for peeing it might just work though.

It could work and you are right about both. But I think really that a 3 in 1 is kind of a difficult concept which while I understand doesn't really work that well for all 3. OTOH, it all has to do with how it's made. (I think one that "grows" is the ideal concept, though rather a difficult one there. (Not really "complaining" more commenting. I don't have one to complain about.)

I have a 5" packer, which works though it is at the edge of what I find useful, hence my comments on the 5.5.

--Jay

Quote from: Brandon on December 02, 2014, 10:52:59 PM
Well who knows it might work for both aspects. After all a womans vagina is really not that deep and the g spot is on the upper wall,but man first you were complaning about the 5'5 being to big know your complaing about this bing to small it might just work for some who knows, I might try it because I am not trying to walk around with a snake in my pants when I go to school everyday.

Hey guys, i see the new packers are up at eroticreations,  i really like the way the new stps look.. i will be ordering the 5 1/2 stp next week, i'll let y'all know how it is.

Interesting. I am curious to see how the STP function works. As I understand it, the previous model's testicles served as "bridge" but it caused it to be uncomfortable while sitting. From looking at the pictures I am guessing one has to pull the testicles to the body.

They are sending me one to try, should be in the mail in a week or so. I'll keep you posted.