Hello everyone,

I am really interested in this form of GRS, due to its increased sensitivity and self-lubrication when compared to penile inversion and scrotal methods.

Does anyone know which surgeons perform this version? I would especially interested if a UK surgeon did, but I shan't hold my breathe!

Thanks

Kira

Nobody knows anything about vaginoplasty utilising an urethral pedical flap and the remainder of the glans?

Doctors have stopped the practice due to excess complications with  necrosis and added healing.

What I heard is doing the split of the blood vessels have to the cervix and other to clit could cause both form complications.   

Look around there might still may be one who will do it as a option? 

Luck

Thank you miss izzy :-)

Quote from: kira21 ♡♡♡ on March 26, 2015, 12:43:09 PM
Hello everyone,

I am really interested in this form of GRS, due to its increased sensitivity and self-lubrication when compared to penile inversion and scrotal methods.

Does anyone know which surgeons perform this version? I would especially interested if a UK surgeon did, but I shan't hold my breathe!

Thanks

Kira

Actually dr ivan in mexico does this. Im set for surgery in 3 months. Having this done.

As far as I know, the penile urethra is used as part of the vaginal lining at dr. Schaff in Munich, Germany and at dr. Djinovic in Belgrade, Serbia. Others may have experimented with that in the past, by no longer do it. Dr. Brassard in Montreal, Canada and dr. Bowers in California use the penile urethra as the lining of the inner part of the labia minora, but not in the vaginal canal. All other big-name surgeons just throw it away.

I do not know of any surgeon who uses glans material inside the vagina nowadays. It is sometimes mentioned as part of the GRS history - 1960s, 1970s. That was back in time when many surgeons (all of them male) were not educated about the importance of the clitoris and only focused on the vaginal canal.

Thank you.

Quote from: Apple on April 03, 2015, 06:30:42 PM
Dr. Brassard in Montreal, Canada and dr. Bowers in California use the penile urethra as the lining of the inner part of the labia minora, but not in the vaginal canal. All other big-name surgeons just throw it away.

I'll be able to ask Marci about this on Monday during my pre-operative appointment but yes the urethra canal part that is past where it would be on a female is splayed to make the pink inner lining of the minora.

as for constructing a "functional" cervix, that seems to be a bit trickier, but I'll ask...
"

Dr. Schaff in Munich uses the urethra for the inner part of the vagina besides some other changes compared to a penile inversion.

I am very happy with the result! I get wet when aroused and I can have sex stealth. I did not lost any sensation.

I can say that all other Schaff girls are also very happy with the result.

Lara

ok so from what I remember when I asked about this, using the rest of the glans for the formation of a cervix was discontinued by most surgeons because it both had no real function other than pure aesthetics since the nerves were cut away from it while also complicating the risks of neovaginal synthesis.

as for the urethral material, its never been considered for use in constructing a cervix, at least on the US circuit the flesh properties are all wrong for it to go there.  its current use as the lining between labia minora I can clearly see already even with all the swelling and bruising of being just a week post-op.

My GRS doc uses the skin of the glans and leaves the nerves intact. And I can say that the result is fantastic in terms of feeling during sex. Most of the innter part of the glans is thrown away.

The urethra inside the penis is used for the vagina, he does not cut it. For me the result is that I am quiete natural wet inside my vagina and  become very wet than aroused.

His technique is different to the penile inversion. The entry of the vagina is formed with skin from the testicles, in the inner part he uses the penis skin. Therefore depth is very good and I have a natural pubic mons and feeling in the complete outer parts of the vagina, in the entry, the clitoris and few feeling in the inner part of the vagina. Which is very similar to CIS girls as far as I can say.

The look is not like a "V" I often saw at other sisters which had a PI. The look is extremly natural also with a different skin color of the outer labia and the inner parts.

The disadvantage is it takes longer to heal (2 weeks in hospital), more effort in the six months after surgery, a second surgery for some corrections and can be very painful.

But when it is healed you even pass a short examination from a gynecologist and you have feeling in the complete area and good depth (up to 21cm).

Lara