Susan's Place Logo

News:

Please be sure to review The Site terms of service, and rules to live by

Main Menu

What size packer to buy?

Started by hiimatrain, April 29, 2015, 07:40:08 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

hiimatrain

Hello! I currently have a Masho packer but have decided to invest in a more expensive one which is also an STP since I am soon going to be going on a residential where I will be mixed in with a load of cis guys.

I was looking towards purchasing a Peecock since I have heard a lot of positive feedback and due to the fact I am not too fond of the hyper-realistic ones! But since I can only get the 4" Gen2 in African Brown (that wouldn't match my skin colour) I am having to go with a Gen2S.

The thing is though that I am still quite new to the packing thing and am cautious about choosing a size. My current Masho is 4" but doesn't feel or look noticeable unless I position it too high on my body. The Gen2S sizes I am looking at are 3.75" and 4.75" but I seriously can't decide which one would be better suited. Any advice? I am 5'8" (173cm) and slim.

Thank you  ;D
  •  

Bimmer Guy

Quote from: hiimatrain on April 29, 2015, 07:40:08 PM
Hello! I currently have a Masho packer but have decided to invest in a more expensive one which is also an STP since I am soon going to be going on a residential where I will be mixed in with a load of cis guys.

I was looking towards purchasing a Peecock since I have heard a lot of positive feedback and due to the fact I am not too fond of the hyper-realistic ones! But since I can only get the 4" Gen2 in African Brown (that wouldn't match my skin colour) I am having to go with a Gen2S.

The thing is though that I am still quite new to the packing thing and am cautious about choosing a size. My current Masho is 4" but doesn't feel or look noticeable unless I position it too high on my body. The Gen2S sizes I am looking at are 3.75" and 4.75" but I seriously can't decide which one would be better suited. Any advice? I am 7'8" (173cm) and slim.

Thank you  ;D

Personally, I think the Mr. Limpy x-small is the perfect size.  3.5 inches and bigger balls than the Masho (that is the problem with the Masho being seen...little balls).  How can you go wrong being around a bunch of cis guys by wearing the average size cis penis?  You can't, imo.
Top Surgery: 10/10/13 (Garramone)
Testosterone: 9/9/14
Hysto: 10/1/15
Stage 1 Meta: 3/2/16 (including UL, Vaginectomy, Scrotoplasty), (Crane, CA)
Stage 2 Meta: 11/11/16 Testicular implants, phallus and scrotum repositioning, v-nectomy revision.  Additional: Lipo on sides of chest. (Crane, TX)
Fistula Repair 12/21/17 (UPenn Hospital,unsuccessful)
Fistula Repair 6/7/18 (Nikolavsky, successful)
Revision: 1/11/19 Replacement of eroded testicle,  mons resection, cosmetic work on scrotum (Crane, TX)



  •  

hiimatrain

Quote from: Brett on April 29, 2015, 07:48:00 PM
Personally, I think the Mr. Limpy x-small is the perfect size.  3.5 inches and bigger balls than the Masho (that is the problem with the Masho being seen...little balls).  How can you go wrong being around a bunch of cis guys by wearing the average size cis penis?  You can't, imo.

I guess so, but I am pretty happy with my Masho (which was pretty much labelled as the improved Mr Limpy which is why I bought it...heard the Mr Limpy's balls could make it look semi-erect from most people) minus the size issue and that it isn't an STP. So I guess a 3.75" Peecock would work so that I don't have to sit down on their terrible loos around them  :D
  •  

Mariah

Hi Hiimatrain, Welcome to susans. I look forward to seeing you around the site. Good luck and hugs

Please check out the following links for site rules, helpful tips and other info...

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me.
[email]mariahsusans.orgstaff@yahoo.com[/email]
I am also spouse of a transgender person.
Retired News Administrator
Retired (S) Global Moderator
  •  

hiimatrain

Quote from: Mariah2014 on April 29, 2015, 08:10:46 PM
Hi Hiimatrain, Welcome to susans. I look forward to seeing you around the site. Good luck and hugs

Please check out the following links for site rules, helpful tips and other info...


Thank you! Will check them all out immediately!
  •  

Bimmer Guy

Quote from: hiimatrain on April 29, 2015, 07:56:55 PM
I guess so, but I am pretty happy with my Masho (which was pretty much labelled as the improved Mr Limpy which is why I bought it...heard the Mr Limpy's balls could make it look semi-erect from most people) minus the size issue and that it isn't an STP. So I guess a 3.75" Peecock would work so that I don't have to sit down on their terrible loos around them  :D

Ah, sorry, yes, you did say STP.  I got stuck on the Masho part.  I personally like the EZP.  They are out of stock right now though and it costs about $250 when all is said and done.  Perfect size and passes at urinal.  No harness required.

http://transthetics.com/the-real-ezp/
Top Surgery: 10/10/13 (Garramone)
Testosterone: 9/9/14
Hysto: 10/1/15
Stage 1 Meta: 3/2/16 (including UL, Vaginectomy, Scrotoplasty), (Crane, CA)
Stage 2 Meta: 11/11/16 Testicular implants, phallus and scrotum repositioning, v-nectomy revision.  Additional: Lipo on sides of chest. (Crane, TX)
Fistula Repair 12/21/17 (UPenn Hospital,unsuccessful)
Fistula Repair 6/7/18 (Nikolavsky, successful)
Revision: 1/11/19 Replacement of eroded testicle,  mons resection, cosmetic work on scrotum (Crane, TX)



  •  

CursedFireDean

I started with a MASHO and when I got my second packer, I went longer, and I liked that decision. Since the MASHO, I've had a 5" Doc Johnson Pack It (it's supposed to be 4.5" but that bs it's a little over 5") and the RM basic packer. I personally would pick the 4.75" for easier access through fly- I wouldn't be sure if the 3.75" would clear the fly for me. However, I think both options are perfectly feasible and I know I prefer a slightly larger packer, which is why I would go for the longer of the two. The shorter is still a perfectly reasonable size and I think they're both very viable for your situation.





Check me out on instagram @flammamajor
  •  

Elis

I'd say get the 3.75 as the 4.75 is bigger than the average cis guys. I also bought my stp from tranzwear and it works great and was also quite cheap.
They/them pronouns preferred.



  •  

hiimatrain

Quote from: Brett on April 29, 2015, 09:27:19 PM
Ah, sorry, yes, you did say STP.  I got stuck on the Masho part.  I personally like the EZP.  They are out of stock right now though and it costs about $250 when all is said and done.  Perfect size and passes at urinal.  No harness required.

http://transthetics.com/the-real-ezp/

I was looking at the EZP and it seemed ideal! Was pretty up for it but the price tag really had surpassed my budget to spend unfortunately :(
  •  

hiimatrain

Quote from: CursedFireDean on April 30, 2015, 12:57:29 AM
I started with a MASHO and when I got my second packer, I went longer, and I liked that decision. Since the MASHO, I've had a 5" Doc Johnson Pack It (it's supposed to be 4.5" but that bs it's a little over 5") and the RM basic packer. I personally would pick the 4.75" for easier access through fly- I wouldn't be sure if the 3.75" would clear the fly for me. However, I think both options are perfectly feasible and I know I prefer a slightly larger packer, which is why I would go for the longer of the two. The shorter is still a perfectly reasonable size and I think they're both very viable for your situation.

Thanks for the advice! I definitely agree on the point that the 3.75" might be a little short and probably would cause issues. Plus I honestly was swaying to the 4.75" anyway  because I know it's what I'd be more comfortable with. Suppose I was worried it'd be too noticeable = embarrassment around the family (just since the use bemuses them quite a bit).
  •  

hiimatrain

Quote from: Elis on April 30, 2015, 02:48:15 AM
I'd say get the 3.75 as the 4.75 is bigger than the average cis guys. I also bought my stp from tranzwear and it works great and was also quite cheap.

Thank you! I think I'm going to go with the 4.75" for ease of using it as an STP though.
  •  

CursedFireDean

Quote from: hiimatrain on April 30, 2015, 08:22:56 PM
Thanks for the advice! I definitely agree on the point that the 3.75" might be a little short and probably would cause issues. Plus I honestly was swaying to the 4.75" anyway  because I know it's what I'd be more comfortable with. Suppose I was worried it'd be too noticeable = embarrassment around the family (just since the use bemuses them quite a bit).
Good luck man, I'm sure you'll find a way to make it not noticeable! :) I'm always paranoid around my family too, I think it's pretty normal.





Check me out on instagram @flammamajor
  •