The article gets more and more frustrating as it progresses.
"We all have this duality — it's part of human nature; a male and female energy, something that I believe is very normal, but society doesn't allow that."
I would argue that the #1 most popular mistake within the gender/sexuality discussion is assuming that the way which every individual experiences gender or sexuality is the same as one's own. I think that it may be true that we all posses characteristics or qualities from each side of the binary, but it is simply unsound to conclude that gender identity is the result of such.
Furthermore, by the end of the article it is still difficult for me to understand how settling upon a "gender-variant" identity equates to acceptance of one's born physical body, since Cummings and Lopez seem to be trying to make the argument that gender is dependent on birth-sex.
An ultimately ignorant standpoint.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk