Quote from: Rachael on December 08, 2007, 12:50:57 PM
While profound, does this 'true reality and spirituality actually mean squat in the real world? which is what this topic is about? can an unpassing transwoman turn to biggots and say 'but im a beautiful being inside'...
no matter how sexy thier chi is, or how female or male or null thier aura is or thier spectoral energy... they have no connection to living an mortal life on this planet now.
Katia had it right imo... whats with the fluffing around now?
R 
Someone who is complete on the inside is not going to be troubled by something so trivial as the passing comments of the ignorant. Ya know? Whereas you can look like a million dollars, but if you're not right on the inside, the merest wrong glance will shatter your entire world. To my mind, living as your target gender as the question asks, is between the ears, not between the legs.
I will never be able to pass. I can fit in very well though. But the idea of passing myself off as something that I'm not is impossible to me at least in terms of a life to live. No. I'm myself, and how could I present that as anything else and call that living?
So yeah my I think this target is less about "passing" and more about what "living as target gender" means.
For those saying that you have to "pass" to live as your "target" gender--how do you deterimine if you pass all the time? And if you pass all your life, but on your death bed someone slips and ma'ams or sirs you--does that invalidate a lifetime of living? Does that mean since you didn't pass, you didn't live as your target gender?
I think that using the standard of passing, creates an impossible situation with regrards to living your life in your "target" gender.
*as a sidenote, I don't agree with the term target gender, because it implies like passing that you are changing your internal state in some sort of dishonest way. A target is something you aim for, not something you have. Just as passing is making yourself seem to be something you're not. Neither term I believe correctly explains transgender. I think fitting in is better than passing, and "gender identity" can be substituted for target gender and expand the terms meaning and applicability. Because now you are bringing in a much wider scope of people, and I think the discussion becomes illuminated.
So if I rewrote the question it would be: Can one fit in as their gender identity regardless of how they look? Suddenly you have a very universal topic, and things get very interesting.
Posted on: December 08, 2007, 01:58:25 PM
Quote from: Keira on December 08, 2007, 01:49:38 PM
Discussing the "meta" of the question is perfectly on topic
because its crucial to define what the question means for
us, or if there is a common ground of understanding on it,
before posting any meaningful answer.
Off topic, but I was wondering why your posts are formatted like they are.