Quote from: jjheipz24 on August 20, 2015, 02:19:56 PM
Yes exactly. I personally identify as non-binary transmasculine. But the differences between someone who says they are butch and someone who says they are transmasculine have become so blurred that it's hard to differentiate. It seems to differ from person to person
Agreed; it's not that simple. Anyone who's read Leslie Feinberg's 1993 novel "Stone Butch Blues" knows that the line's been blurry within the community for about as long as the idea of transition has been on the table. Here's how I tend to look at it:
Imagine a person -- DFAB. Probably young. Their sense of style is distinctly masculine, and that, combined with some of their hobbies, likely landed them a label like "gender non-conforming" or even "dyke." As they've grown, they've come to realize that they value strength and power in their body much higher than things like delicacy or beauty and when they look in the mirror, they long for a muscular form. They don't really care for their breasts -- to them, it's sort of visually distracting, and it ruins the sharp silohuette they wish they cut. As for their junk, well, they haven't thought about it much. They were born with a vagina and that's all they know.
So, is the person described above "butch" or "transmasculine"? Well... good question.
If they're attracted to women, they may have found themselves falling into the butch label pretty quickly. Stud, butch, AG, boi... there are a lot of words already in place to label those who are masculine of center. Some butch people use T to bulk up. Some have mastectomies/top surgery.
Evolving Beauty mentioned the comparison between an effeminate gay guy vs a real trans person, and I think that's a good point, but not quite right? It's fuzzier.
In the DFAB world, there's no such thing as a crossdresser. "Men's clothes" are largely nonexistant these days, which is why we don't hear as many tales about a girl sneaking into her father's closet to try on his pants. In contrast to our society's "one drop rule" for femininity, a DFAB person has to go to great lengths to be considered to be blurring gender lines.
They basically have to be wearing a dick. Do they want to pack? Do they want a dick of their own> Feeling dissociated from one's junk or wishing for an outtie rather than an innie has typically been one thing that pushes folks towards the transmasculine label. In my opinion, it might actually be the Big Question for questioning DFAB people. It was for me.
Of course, there have always been DFAB people who walked between genders. That's why the lesbian community has labels like "stone" or "stone butch" -- someone who kept their pants on during sex and did not receive sexual pleasure, possibly (but not necessarily) due to bottom dysphoria. If dysphoria is involved, how did people not immediately know they were trans? Well, first of all, like I said, there was already an existing label used by similar people with similar feelings. Also, many of us had this vague feeling that transgender was synonymous with transfeminine. We had an image of a trans woman in our heads. We didn't know it could go the other way!
But now, with trans activism and discourse spreading around the word, people who previously only saw one option for themselves are faced with different set of identity words. One has weight and history. One has a feeling of future and promise. What's butch vs transmasculine? Idk. Junk, maybe. Preference, mostly. Age, if the person was coming of age after the dawning public awareness of transgender existence.
I guess I didn't answer this question at all, really.