If the op was made at 18, the story makes no sense.
It only makes sense if the op was performed earlier, but
even then do doctors really take out sex organs in children?
But, I have trouble believing a doctor would mistake an
enlarge clitoris for a penis and then remove the internal organs!!!!!
Also, the fact that this person would have had to take T all those
years to keep male sexual characteristics and that the chromosomes
would tell a story (at least say that she's IS if that's indeed the case).
This thing doesn't make any sense. Either I'm insane or the journalist's gone wonky.