Susan's Place Logo

News:

Visit our Discord server  and Wiki

Main Menu

Male socialization or inherent male traits and thinking?

Started by Nero, December 12, 2007, 01:54:44 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Rachael

its not my fault it took 3 suicide attempts to show me i couldnt playact any longer... its not MY FAULT my pain was so great...
R :police:
  •  

Nero

Quote from: Nero on December 13, 2007, 11:05:22 AM
Quote from: Kate on December 13, 2007, 09:14:55 AM
Quote from: Nero on December 12, 2007, 01:54:44 PM
Just how pervasive is 'male socialization'? For some women, can it really be all chalked up to their 'male socialization' or do they simply think and act like men?

I don't know. It's a question I pondered a lot when I was trying to find justification for transitioning, but I've since lost interest. It's just SO tempting to split people into REAL and FAKE so we can feel good about ourselves... by standing on top of everyone else. It's a great way for anyone who's unsure of themselves, or who's afraid to take responsibility for their actions to rationalize why transitioning was OK for them to do.

So even thought it might be true for all I know, I personally try to avoid thinking that way. Whether I'm a real woman or a wannabe, I STILL did it, I still transitioned, and it's entirely my doing and responsibility.

~Kate~

Why is there an uber-girly wood sprite arguing with me about this? ::)

And why does having strong but unpopular opinions always have to be about elitism or low self esteem?
Couldn't it be that some are genuinely annoyed that its the 'male acting women' and 'female acting men' that set the stereotypes for the way we are seen?

This is not about elitism or superiority complexes.
We're already seen as wannabe men and wannabe women. And when we've got people out there proving the stereotype, it's infuriating.
I'm sick of the militant man-hating 'men' out there setting all these stereotypes for I am automatically perceived because they whine the loudest.
I'm sick of hearing girls say 'Oh, you're ftm? Cool! I love ftms because they're so much softer, sweeter, and gentler than genetic men.'  >:(



and with some women, I'm sick of the effort to keep reminding myself I'm arguing with a woman when it definitely has the feel of arguing with a man. (and before anyone takes offense, that refers to a recent incident having to do with nobody on this thread)
Nero was the Forum Admin here at Susan's Place for several years up to the time of his death.
  •  

Rachael

i wasnt having a go at you, but at theory... please understand i dont want to hurt a person...
R :police:
  •  

Nero

Quote from: Kate on December 13, 2007, 10:37:55 AM
I just keep thinking that as a kid, I played Cops & Robbers, climbed trees, rode motorcycles, raced cars, built tree forts, studied military history... all sorts of "male-ish" things. And not because I was socialized or forced into it, but because I *enjoyed* it. There were no Barbies, no EasyBakes and no trying on panties. In fact, I also thought (when younger) that girls were usually incredibly shallow and petty. Here I am, studying Rommel's North Afrika campaign, and the girls just want to play with glitter paint.

And yet, I spent every second of every day thinking, "If only...", and studied and envied everything about them, even their shallowness, lol.

So maybe that makes me a wannabe then?

I guess the only time socialization clashed with me was when sexuality became involved. I couldn't STAND it when men objectified women and made fun of them. I couldn't understand why they were so stupid and mean about it. It seemed the tables turned as a teenager, and boys became the stupid, shallow ones... and girls came into their own. The catch was, I *desperately* wanted acceptance from the girls, but I did NOT want sex. I wanted *affection*, and intimate (not sexual) relationships... a sharing of our souls and feelings and hopes and dreams, but... I was a male. It wasn't happening. Girls thought I was a boy, and boys thought I was just plain weird. And the one boy who did share... well we ended up in a very odd, volatile, platonic yet romantic relationship that couldn't go anywhere.

Then trying to be a husband, terrified of being forced to be a father, trying to be a hetero male for my wife... I honestly thought at the time I could do it, conform, learn to adapt. But after 17 years, I had to admit defeat, and transition. And it seems to be working wonderfully well for me.

So maybe I'm a real woman then?

See, I dunno, it's only fair for me to test myself in the theory, and I just don't seem to fit very well. I have traits which make me a wannabe, and signs it's "natural" for me too. Maybe it's just the gemini adaptability in me ;)

~Kate~

anne-girl, anne-girl, anne-girl... :eusa_naughty: 'traits that make you a wannabe?' oh sure, and the sky's not blue either. :icon_rolleyes:

It's not about actions - panties, barbies, and lipstick, but reactions. Playing with barbies and trying on panties never made anyone a girl.
Nero was the Forum Admin here at Susan's Place for several years up to the time of his death.
  •  

Jaynatopia

Hmm; it's a bit of a complex thing really. I have to think that socializing as male did affect me on some level but I am not sure how. I don't feel I have any problem socializing as female. As male I generally didn't socialize much; I was a loner. As female I am far more gregarious but would say I have a mix of guy and gal friends. Does that answer the question? I am not sure.

I can say that being/living female has enabled me to socialize in a way that feels more natural to me.
  •  

Kate

Quote from: Nero on December 13, 2007, 11:05:22 AM
Why is there an uber-girly wood sprite arguing with me about this? ::)

Maybe it's just what uber-girly wood sprites are wired to do? ;)

QuoteAnd why does having strong but unpopular opinions always have to be about elitism or low self esteem?

It doesn't. I'm just aware of the tendency in myself. I'd LOVE to believe there are real TSs and wannabe women, so I could be one of the real ones. It'd be... comforting... to think I'm a "real woman" and deserved to transition.

That doesn't mean the theory isn't true though. It may very well be perfectly valid. I'm just scared to embrace it, because if I DO, then I have to face facts that I may fall into the wannabe side of things. I'm looking back to childhood, at my "male socialization," and I didn't feel forced into it. At least not with THINGS and STUFF. What felt wrong was when it came to PEOPLE and RELATIONSHIPS.

QuoteCouldn't it be that some are genuinely annoyed that its the 'male acting women' and 'female acting men' that set the stereotypes for the way we are seen?

Sure! YOU know I get annoyed at certain "types" too. But I just don't know WHY they are the way they are.

Still, I'll admit, the whole "socialization" thing feels wrong to me. I did what I did because I LIKED it, not because I was forced into it. I didn't end up riding motorcycles because I was "socialized as a male." I did it because that was something available to me within the male world which I found fun to do. But I don't think I picked up a ton of "male socialization" mannerisms that were "wrong" for me. If I picked up anything, it was because it "stuck," it worked for me.

And yet when I tried to force things like being a husband and male lover, it just would NOT work. God knows I TRIED, and I mean tried every imaginable compromise, work-around, lets-pretend game... and it just does NOT work. My world, my wife, and even *I* TRIED to socialize myself into those roles, but... it's impossible. It took me WAY too long to realize and admit the futility of it all, but at least for myself, socialization doesn't seem work unless it "fits" me.

There are some things I need to drop. My wife keeps yelling "DOOR!" to me when we're entering places, lol. "What?" I ask. "Stop holding the door open for me!" she yells, lol. Life is truly insane when you're wife is mad at you for holding open the door for her, lol...

I dunno Nero, I think I just confused myself even more, lol...

~Kate~
  •  

NicholeW.

I stopped reading a bit ago and jumped to the response. To be honest....                                       *smile* Gotcha.

Invariably, 'to be honest' on a trans board almost always means 'I am going to say what I think about those people who are nothing like me. So I can be honest about them.' The subtext should be fairly clear, my 9-year old seems to get it when I talk with him that way.

I think most people know when their self-efficacy is missing. I've never found that they need me to highlight it for them. Besides, I have my own stuff to work through. Best I stay focused on that.

Now, we are every last one socialized -- even if we are raised by wolves. We have to be; because, unlike a baby crocodile, we cannot survive after a few weeks of living without a society. If you aren't socialized you are dead and thus, shouldn't be writing on this board at all, unless this board is a ouija board.

To "drop" one's socialization as though it were a negligee is not only impossible, it's dangerous as well. Because as I drop it, I am left with nothing to protect me at all. However, I can change my slant on socialization and become re-socialized. That is a process and one that requires better insight and willingness to work hard and long than I generally see displayed in these sorts of arguments.

The re-socialization piece is gonna be harder for some than for others and that seems like what this series of posts is trying to make for. Is it more difficult for some than for others? Yes, no question.

Does it tend to be more simple and a better match when someone is younger? I think so. Which is why I feel no particular need to box your ears, Rachael!! *smile* Just show a bit of patience with those who are trying and don't have your dexterity and grace when doing so.

We spend so much time making comparison of one to another and all compared to me!! Why?!! How would I go about comparing myself to Nero? I might die for his breasts (from his description.) *grin* But, what do I know about living his life that I can compare it to my own? And why would I anyway?

Transition is about me feeling right about ME. Not me feeling right about Janewatchamacallit. It's my comfort or lack of comfort that's the important thing. Do people sometimes piss me off on these and other boards? Yes. Do people always have good, safe and sensible approaches to things? Not in my opinion. But, as long as they aren't directing me with the power to make it stick, what do I need worry about in regard to them? In fact, I often wonder what's bothering me really when I read some tripe and get bothered by it?

To call another MTF a 'man' is to insult her effort and belittle myself. To discuss the difficulty or facility one might have in resocializing herself and how she went about that... that is something different entirely. It seems like we should be able to discuss such things without fanning flames and having to put out fires.

Do I have opinions? Yes. Do some of those revolve around people I know or read? Yes. But, I spoz my question is this. What difference is my stating that opinion going to make in their life, or mine?

Does male socialization exist? Yes. Can it be re-learned in a different voice? Yes. Is that more difficult for younger or older transitioners? For older ones. Like Ashley said, they used and lived in that socialization a lot longer than someone who, thankfully, like Rachael or Tink dropped the facade early on and went toward her true voice.

But the wait doesn't mean that an older transitioner cannot sing or is less a woman than a younger transitioner. It may well mean that when they do sing, their sopranos sound different than the other. They can still sing in harmony though.


  •  

Nero

Quote from: Kate on December 13, 2007, 01:08:58 PM
Quote from: Nero on December 13, 2007, 11:05:22 AM
Why is there an uber-girly wood sprite arguing with me about this? ::)

Maybe it's just what uber-girly wood sprites are wired to do? ;)

QuoteAnd why does having strong but unpopular opinions always have to be about elitism or low self esteem?

It doesn't. I'm just aware of the tendency in myself. I'd LOVE to believe there are real TSs and wannabe women, so I could be one of the real ones. It'd be... comforting... to think I'm a "real woman" and deserved to transition.

That doesn't mean the theory isn't true though. It may very well be perfectly valid. I'm just scared to embrace it, because if I DO, then I have to face facts that I may fall into the wannabe side of things. I'm looking back to childhood, at my "male socialization," and I didn't feel forced into it. At least not with THINGS and STUFF. What felt wrong was when it came to PEOPLE and RELATIONSHIPS.

QuoteCouldn't it be that some are genuinely annoyed that its the 'male acting women' and 'female acting men' that set the stereotypes for the way we are seen?

Sure! YOU know I get annoyed at certain "types" too. But I just don't know WHY they are the way they are.

Still, I'll admit, the whole "socialization" thing feels wrong to me. I did what I did because I LIKED it, not because I was forced into it. I didn't end up riding motorcycles because I was "socialized as a male." I did it because that was something available to me within the male world which I found fun to do. But I don't think I picked up a ton of "male socialization" mannerisms that were "wrong" for me. If I picked up anything, it was because it "stuck," it worked for me.

And yet when I tried to force things like being a husband and male lover, it just would NOT work. God knows I TRIED, and I mean tried every imaginable compromise, work-around, lets-pretend game... and it just does NOT work. My world, my wife, and even *I* TRIED to socialize myself into those roles, but... it's impossible. It took me WAY too long to realize and admit the futility of it all, but at least for myself, socialization doesn't seem work unless it "fits" me.

There are some things I need to drop. My wife keeps yelling "DOOR!" to me when we're entering places, lol. "What?" I ask. "Stop holding the door open for me!" she yells, lol. Life is truly insane when you're wife is mad at you for holding open the door for her, lol...

I dunno Nero, I think I just confused myself even more, lol...

~Kate~

I'm not talking hobbies and such. I think we're sometimes drawn to certain things as children because we're permitted to be. How many little boys do you think would play house and easybake ovens if it weren't frowned upon?
I was fortunate. My folks didn't see hobbies and toys as gendered. I was given both 'girl' things and 'boy' things. But most of those raised as 'male' and some raised as 'female' aren't so lucky.
Nero was the Forum Admin here at Susan's Place for several years up to the time of his death.
  •  

Rachael

we seem to focus here so much, on learned things... traits taught, men dont naturally hold doors for women, its a social thing....
there is however, a line where socialisation, blends into who the person is... attitudes, reactions to some things... I once (Only time btw) went to coffee with a m2f friend from the irc... i dont know if they ever come in anymore, but hey... this person KEPT saying how good i looked and that 'oh if i were still a man id want to sh*g you so much... makeing sexual comments, flirting, and at one point, rubbed her chin, and then rumaged in her purse for an electric razor, and proceeded to shave IN the coffee shop... i promptly stood and left without another word...
thats not socialisation.... thats male thought processes...
R :police:
  •  

NicholeW.

Quote from: Rachael on December 13, 2007, 02:58:35 PM
we seem to focus here so much, on learned things... traits taught, men dont naturally hold doors for women, its a social thing....
there is however, a line where socialisation, blends into who the person is... attitudes, reactions to some things... I once (Only time btw) went to coffee with a m2f friend from the irc... i dont know if they ever come in anymore, but hey... this person KEPT saying how good i looked and that 'oh if i were still a man id want to sh*g you so much... makeing sexual comments, flirting, and at one point, rubbed her chin, and then rumaged in her purse for an electric razor, and proceeded to shave IN the coffee shop... i promptly stood and left without another word...
thats not socialisation.... thats male thought processes...
R :police:


That's just boorish stupidity. Did the person fart loudly as well and spit?

I don't know that its male at all, although i cannot think of a woman I have ever been around who did thsoe sorts of things. But, neither have I been around men who do those sorts of things.

But, I don't think that is 'natural' behavior any more than a bubble-bath is a 'natural-state' bath. It's learned and probably had more to do with someone's notion of 'breaking down stereotypes' while being stereotypically rude, stoopid and disgusting.

  •  

Nero

For those that buy into the 'socialization is everything' theories -

If it doesn't come natural, then how can one be the gender they claim to be?
I mean, there's GOT to be something more going on than 'I know I'm male/female inside'.

I understand the LEARNED stuff, such as Kate said with opening doors and such. But that is merely learned behaviours that differ between cultures.

How can the other stuff like reactions and such not come naturally?
Nero was the Forum Admin here at Susan's Place for several years up to the time of his death.
  •  

NicholeW.

Quote from: Nero on December 13, 2007, 04:59:42 PM
For those that buy into the 'socialization is everything' theories -

How can the other stuff like reactions and such not come naturally?

Which reactions are you asking about, Nero? Startle-reactions do have a lot to do with estrogen/testosterone, apparently. Deer, etc show that: bucks are harder to get to run than are does, especially does with fawns. Some processing differences are hard-wired and the proclivity for certain things is associated with gender differentiation.

Relationality seems to be programmed into all herd-animals, like humans and gorillas and chimpanzees, and cows and horses.

What other reactions do you have in mind?

  •  

Nero

Quote from: Nichole W. on December 13, 2007, 05:17:43 PM
Quote from: Nero on December 13, 2007, 04:59:42 PM
For those that buy into the 'socialization is everything' theories -

How can the other stuff like reactions and such not come naturally?

Which reactions are you asking about, Nero? Startle-reactions do have a lot to do with estrogen/testosterone, apparently. Deer, etc show that: bucks are harder to get to run than are does, especially does with fawns. Some processing differences are hard-wired and the proclivity for certain things is associated with gender differentiation.

Relationality seems to be programmed into all herd-animals, like humans and gorillas and chimpanzees, and cows and horses.

What other reactions do you have in mind?



for example:

a transguy who responds in typically female ways to things. not necessarily 'survival instincts' like you mentioned. but a guy who despite having perfected his walk, talk, dress, etc is unable to relate to other men as a man. it's not easy to explain. it can't be summed up by 'guys do this, girls do that. kind of thing. it's just when you know their thought processes don't match.

another example:

a transwoman who responds with cold hard facts to an emotional, sensitive discussion. most men aren't even that cold. it's an extremely macho reaction.
Nero was the Forum Admin here at Susan's Place for several years up to the time of his death.
  •  

NicholeW.

Quote from: Nero on December 13, 2007, 06:00:30 PM

for example:

a transguy who responds in typically female ways to things. not necessarily 'survival instincts' like you mentioned. but a guy who despite having perfected his walk, talk, dress, etc is unable to relate to other men as a man. it's not easy to explain. it can't be summed up by 'guys do this, girls do that. kind of thing. it's just when you know their thought processes don't match.

another example:

a transwoman who responds with cold hard facts to an emotional, sensitive discussion. most men aren't even that cold. it's an extremely macho reaction.

For those two I would have to go with socialization. I know, you hate it.

I think, but don't know, that trans-men are sometimes caught in the sme double-bind with "being a guy" that trans-women were caught in prior to transition. I cannot recall a time when I truly enjoyed male companionship in a group, for instance. A sorta 'herd' instinct seemed to take over that lead conversations and reactions in ways that I found totally off-putting. Quit being in places and situations like that by the time I was a year into college. The "EWWW" response.

As far as not relating "to other men as a man" I can't help much with that, not particularly ever having been big on that myself. Although relating to men as human beings hasn't come very hard at all. They hurt, and their wounds often go untended by themselves and others in deference to being able "to be strong." That, imo, is a socialized response. Not from a particular society, I think, as much as from an "entire humanity" perspective. Maybe started when we were all running around looking like "Lucy" --- the australopithecine homonid from the Afar region of Ethiopia -- of 4Mln. years ago.

Hmmm, the second, am I responding with "cold hard facts to an emotional, sensitive discussion?" *smile* That also, in my mind, is a carry-over from the way that person has been raised. Something along the lines of "men don't express emotion, they express rationality." LOL

That just seems to me as though someone is cut off from her own feelings -- that tends to be a cultural/social set of behaviors that is acutely ingrained in guys.

I suppose what I am arguing here is that some traits are biological, but very few, mostly secondary sex characteristics: breasts, vaginas/penises, fatty deposit locations, E/T, bone-structure (generally) and relative size (generally.)

Things like relationality (believe me, I once thought men lacked that essentially) seem to me now to be deeply ingrained socialization qualities that could be available to all humans if they were allowed to indulge in them.

Essentially speaking (metaphysically?), I tend to lean more and more toward the idea that there are no 'essential' differences, just the superficial chemical/biological ones I mentioned above and the social ones I mentioned also above.

(In the E/T differences, women may be a bit more disposed toward relationality by dint of estrogen: such qualities as nurturing and gathering for safety seem to have some relation to estrogen, depending on the 'danger' that threatens. Just as T seems to tilt the individual balance more toward 'action.' Men tend to be more aggressive in response to a threat not directed necessarily toward young humans.)

Fact is, these are things that seem more than a bit tricky to winnow down to whole grain, Nero. We have ideas, and in some ways can back-up those with 'scientific evidence' and moreso through individual experience. My own feeling is that we (women) are less cold. The whys for that I want to believe are mostly conditioned, but the tilt toward them may be biological/chemical and in that respect 'essential.'

But, how in the world to show that?

I really hope this an intellectual discussion!!! I keep reading your questions and answers in that light. If it is a 'sensitive, emotional discussion' except in regard to someone maybe feeling he or she is being dissed, then I am going to have to rethink and re-experience this whole thing!!! Goddess, and I thought I was making some sense out of it!!! hahahahaha At least for myself.



 
  •  

Nero

I appreciate all that and all, but how are we trans if it's all socialization? or estrogen? if everything's socialization, than how can we be men/women inside?
if it's socialization, then that begs the question - is it just that we want to be our target sex?
because if we're not already hardwired to be a certain way, then what is it that makes us trans? just 'wanting' to be the target gender?

Posted on: December 13, 2007, 08:02:04 PM
Quote from: Nero on December 13, 2007, 07:02:04 PM
I appreciate all that and all, but how are we trans if it's all socialization? or estrogen? if everything's socialization, than how can we be men/women inside?
if it's socialization, then that begs the question - is it just that we want to be our target sex?
because if we're not already hardwired to be a certain way, then what is it that makes us trans? just 'wanting' to be the target gender?

ps. the 'cold hard facts thing' refers to a particular incident. a very cold incident. no one in this thread.
Nero was the Forum Admin here at Susan's Place for several years up to the time of his death.
  •  

NicholeW.

Quote from: Nero on December 13, 2007, 07:03:37 PM
I appreciate all that and all, but how are we trans if it's all socialization? or estrogen? if everything's socialization, than how can we be men/women inside?
if it's socialization, then that begs the question - is it just that we want to be our target sex?
because if we're not already hardwired to be a certain way, then what is it that makes us trans? just 'wanting' to be the target gender?

Posted on: December 13, 2007, 08:02:04 PM
Quote from: Nero on December 13, 2007, 07:02:04 PM
I appreciate all that and all, but how are we trans if it's all socialization? or estrogen? if everything's socialization, than how can we be men/women inside?
if it's socialization, then that begs the question - is it just that we want to be our target sex?
because if we're not already hardwired to be a certain way, then what is it that makes us trans? just 'wanting' to be the target gender?

ps. the 'cold hard facts thing' refers to a particular incident. a very cold incident. no one in this thread.

Okay, now I get it. Prolly shouldn't have skipped over some of the posts back there.

Like I said, there ARE some biological differences. Brain structures appear to be some of those differences. (see medical/psychological research at the Amsterdam Free University) There are some quantifiable differences found in the hippocampus that indicate that tran-men and trans-women have brain structure that fall within normal ranges for the sex for which we don't have the natural bodies. I would be willing to suspect that there are other brain differences in other places.

I think the struggle within us is often a matter of a particular brain-wiring that gets the wrong hormonal treatments post-conception and post-uetero. That would be you have a male brain and a female anatomy and I the opposite, prior to transition.

So, no, I do not, very definitely, think we are just 'wanting' to be our target gender.

I do think a lot of our behaviors are socialized though. And I think that some of those behaviors are predisposed away from what the socialization is by our hard-wiring. But, I also think so many of us try so hard to be what everyone claims we are, that we often make a strong connection with our conditioning. That is tough to re-condition.

Whew. Ya know how to tire a girl out, mistuh!! *smile*
  •  

Hypatia

Quote from: Nero on December 13, 2007, 11:05:22 AM
I'm sick of hearing girls say 'Oh, you're ftm? Cool! I love ftms because they're so much softer, sweeter, and gentler than genetic men.'
Huh? From my perspective as a woman, I see it quite differently. I love trans guys because so many of them I've known exemplify the masculine traits I value highly in good men-- a sense of honor, reliable steadfastness and stoic strength, chivalry toward the ladies, solidity of character. Trans guys have seen both sides of gender and out of this wider perspective have developed a great wisdom about where they stand. I feel that by consciously remolding their lives to live up to the ideals of being masculine, they show a great respect for masculinity, and really do it justice instead of lazily taking it for granted the way too many bio-males do. I wish more men were as conscientious about their manhood as trans men are.
Here's what I find about compromise--
don't do it if it hurts inside,
'cause either way you're screwed,
eventually you'll find
you may as well feel good;
you may as well have some pride

--Indigo Girls
  •  

Nero

Quote from: Hypatia on December 15, 2007, 12:41:30 AM
Quote from: Nero on December 13, 2007, 11:05:22 AM
I'm sick of hearing girls say 'Oh, you're ftm? Cool! I love ftms because they're so much softer, sweeter, and gentler than genetic men.'
Huh? From my perspective as a woman, I see it quite differently. I love trans guys because so many of them I've known exemplify the masculine traits I value highly in good men-- a sense of honor, reliable steadfastness and stoic strength, chivalry toward the ladies, solidity of character. Trans guys have seen both sides of gender and out of this wider perspective have developed a great wisdom about where they stand. I feel that by consciously remolding their lives to live up to the ideals of being masculine, they show a great respect for masculinity, and really do it justice instead of lazily taking it for granted the way too many bio-males do. I wish more men were as conscientious about their manhood as trans men are.

I wish more ladies saw us as you do. :)
Nero was the Forum Admin here at Susan's Place for several years up to the time of his death.
  •  

Hypatia

I also believe that a hallmark of the best masculinity is a man's respect and solicitude for women, and yes, gentleness. Perhaps this is what those girls were perceiving but misinterpreting as "softness."

Frankly, Nero, having grown up tortured by the male expectations imposed on me that felt so alien to who I was, and having been bullied and abused by males, I came to feel a deep loathing for maleness. I'm grateful to trans men for showing me the good side of being male and helping me learn not to hate men.

Quote from: Nero on December 15, 2007, 12:47:03 AM
I wish more ladies saw us as you do. :)
Well, I've seen gender from both sides now too, brother. ;)
Here's what I find about compromise--
don't do it if it hurts inside,
'cause either way you're screwed,
eventually you'll find
you may as well feel good;
you may as well have some pride

--Indigo Girls
  •  

Rachael

its all estrogen? socialisation? i heavily disagreee... that removes all gender hardwireing you want to claim to not feel like you chose to change physical sex...
I think socialisation has very little to do with this, and its simply an excuse tbh... there are enough cases of teen, and infant transitions showing it CANT be socialisation, what have they had? yet they already behave one way?
there are enough transpeople who literally cant cope/function as thier raised sex to prove its simply not ALL learned or chemical...
R :police:
  •