Susan's Place Logo

News:

Since its founding in 1995 Susan's Place forums have blossomed into a truly global lifeline. To date we've delivered roughly 1.4 billion page views to hundreds of millions of unique visitors, guided more than 41,000 registered members through 1,985,081 posts and 188,474 topics across 193 boards, and—most importantly—helped save tens of thousands of lives by connecting people to vital information and support at their most vulnerable moments.

Main Menu

peecock gen 2 vs. gen 3

Started by LatrellHK, June 02, 2016, 09:23:45 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

LatrellHK

I finally decided on a brand of STP/packer and was recommended peecock. After the iffy reviews regarding freetom, peecock is the winner. Sad, I really liked their uncut packer (I prefer that look personally).

So now I gotta decide on which one! My friend who has one says its awesome, but peeing is a learning process. He has a Gen2(s I think). I saw that and like it but am curious as to why the shirts pulled down like that. Can it not stay down on it's own?

Anyway, I guess I'm trying to ask what the difference is and which one might be better. I am a bit paranoid about skin tone as I am not exactly a "dark chocolate" but I'm not light either. I'm a middle, which packer/stp companies seem to forget about. Since it's a bit darker down there it's hard finding one for a middle toned guy that's a little darker to match.

I'm also very nervous with size. I'm 5'6 and skinny, so size is a problem. I was thinking of the 3.75, but which gen is a concern.

I really just want to know the differences between the gens, especially 2, 2s, 3, and 3s. I was thinking 2s or 3, but not until I know the difference.
  •  

dutch_boy

I've used both, quite contently. Currently using the gen3 pretty much accident free (unless I'm wearing tight pants or really have to pee).

The biggest differences:
-material: gen2 is far softer and floppier than gen3, which is stiffer. Balls on both are pretty dense and don't mash in pants or underwear.
-shape: gen3 is more realistic, though on both the balls are too small for my liking
-size: the 3.75 gen3 is bigger both in length and in girth than the 4 gen2. With your height I'd definitely go for the smallest one. The top "flap" of the gen3 is thicker and sturdier and will show through thin underwear or speedos.
-ease of use: maybe it's because i finally figured out how to use it properly, but the gen3 is a little easier to use, especially with a harness to put it in place. I tended to put it too far backwards, trying to pee in the shaft directly, but that doesn't work. For me anyway
-color: I'm caucasian so it might be different for you, but I feel the color is more natural in the newer one. Though it's still nowhere near the RM or EZP (with paint job). The peecock paint will come off in a matter of days.

If I had to replace mine, i'd go for the gen3 again. It has its issues, but it works for me quite well, even without a harness. If I left something out, feel free to ask.

  •  

LatrellHK

I don't really know what you mean by 'flap'. Can you explain that?
  •  

dutch_boy

The bit that sticks out above the shaft at the base, that will rest on your pubic mound.
  •