I had a look at that paper and had some observations. Medicine's not my thing, so perhaps someone else could go further.
On page 6, Table I, there's some statistics on the 395 SRS's they did from 2009 to 2013. You don't often see that, so its quite interesting if you want to know what might go wrong. I don't if its good or bad - presumably good or he wouldn't publish it. There's no fistula's but then it not a large number either.
The average surgical time is 3 hours. Suporn's is I believe 5.5 hours. I'd assume less time under general anesthetic is safer and has less side effects, so you have to wonder what benefit you might get with that extra time. Hopefully something.
Also on page 6 is a section on Skin Grafts
"Many Thai patients are presenting with a short penis; many patients from Arabic countries are circumcised;
many patients from western countries demand a deep vagina (deeper than 14 cm): as a consequence, the use of skin graft has become very common at our centre. Still,
when there is abundant penile skin, the vagina is solely lined with penile skin. The
preferred skin graft used is a full thickness from the
scrotum."
Whats up with these Westerners?
I notice there's appears to be no actual statistics for depth in the paper, which is a curious omission seeing as westerners are asking for it. In Suporn's 2004 presentation the average depth was 6.4", and
During the period 2010 - 2013 the average vaginal depth has been in the region of 7 inches (17.8 cm)http://www.supornclinic.com/restricted/SRS/SRSTechnique.aspxThere's discussion of what they use the scrotal graft for but I didn't really understand it. I have the impression, especially from the above, that they try to use penile skin for the vagina, whereas Suporn uses scrotal skin for that. So they both use it, just differing amounts in different places.
Suporn discusses this on the image 110.jpg in the presentation you can download here. It's a bit unclear to me as they both appear to use penile and scrotal skin for both purposes, presumably its a matter of what their first priorities are.
<Link Removed>
I've no real idea if that's correct.
On page 5 there's a 1+ year post-op result. Given the limitations of photo its a bit hard to be sure, but I think I much prefer Suporn for aesthetics.
Mod Edit:TOS 5