Quote from: Sophia Sage on February 15, 2017, 01:13:16 AM
I don't think FFS surgeons are as familiar with hairline aesthetics and what it takes to achieve a natural look with transplants... rather, I'd seek out a specialist, who pretty much does only this, and who does a significant amount of work with (cis) female clients as well.
But, as you pointed out, it can get very expensive. I think it's possible to get the best of both worlds -- advance the scalp first, then cover the scar and perfect the hairline with transplants (which will be less expensive because fewer are required). I'm sorry, but I think the hairline scar is every bit as likely to be visible with the hair pulled back, if not more so, than transplants.
Well - I would think a scar is always also visible if one looks close enough - and I mean for both things one would need to look closely - to see the transplants or to see a well made scar running right at or 2mm behind the hairline.
I think for people who have a receding hairline, the hairline incision is almost mandatory - you would have to fillin too much with transplants. Personally I would think that a case like mine is good suited for transplants as I only need to fill in the corners and actually there are some hair there already, but only small ones and irregular/patchy...
Quote from: gatita on February 14, 2017, 05:48:07 PM
Yes you are right again. A lot of patients are happy with the transplants. Those patients usually will always wear their hair down so that the transplants blend in and are covered by other hair or they will part the hair, pull it down and cover the transplants.
My message was to anyone who is active and works out and always wears their hair up and pulled back in a ponytail or bun.
I heard the exact same about the hairline incision - it loooks great because people often wear a fringe or open hair anyway, so the hairline scar is not exposed - pulling back the hair however would expose the scar completely, so I was told it would actually be better to get transplants for that.
So it seems to be undecided - both methods seem to work, but in both cases depending on the situation of the hairline before the surgery, there is a chance that it will be visible on close inspection, that something was done.
QuoteAgain, the nerve damage and scar all goes back to the skill of the surgeon. You find the right one and voila... 20 days after surgery and you're already looking and feeling great.
I am not sure about this - Even first class surgeons like Dr O used to say that there is a loss of nerves involved in forehead FFS and it will not always return. I never heard of a surgeon so far who could promise that there will be minimal damage that will always recover. The nerves are cut - there is no way around this. They will have to regrow from where they were cut. If that happens or not so much seems to me not much in the skill of the surgeon, but more in the ability of an individual body to heal, maybe in the hormone therapy to give a healthy healing grounds, and in my view the damage is less severe when cutting more back at the head, when the area to recover is smaller.

QuoteAND unfortunately there is no such thing as properly... a hair transplant is a hair transplant. It's a human poking holes in your head that will never ever come close to replicating a natural hairline or natural hair density.
.....
They said in an email and I quote
"If you wear tight ponytails or up-do's frequently, I regret to say that hair grafts are only meant to look good (or even excellent) with loose hairstyles, or in a low ponytail. If you tighten them upwards, the difference between the transplanted hair and the rest becomes more evident. With hair grafts it's more or less like the difference between a natural forest and an area that has been afforested by humans. One looks natural, irregular and dense, while the other looks uniform, less dense and somehow lined up. The more upwards you tighten the grafted hair, the less natural it looks, regardless of how good the surgeon who did the job was."
Well, I assume the email is from a surgeon who does hairline advance with surgery and does not do hair transplants except to cover up the scar, possible? It would be as biased then as asking Facialteam about it , who will always recommend hair transplants...

I do think however that id a surgeon would do it "properly" , which you say does not exist, he would avoid placing the hair follices in neat rows like a afforested area. They could place them more irregular if they wanted, right? Of course density may be an issue - they can only put the hairs as close together as their method allows - so there is a limitation, which I would say is a good reason to avoid covering very large areas with transplants. It is in my opinion more of a method for smaller patches.
This is for example what I would need to get fixed: