Susan's Place Logo

News:

Based on internal web log processing I show 3,417,511 Users made 5,324,115 Visits Accounting for 199,729,420 pageviews and 8.954.49 TB of data transfer for 2017, all on a little over $2,000 per month.

Help support this website by Donating or Subscribing! (Updated)

Main Menu

Pew Research Center: 5 key findings about LGBT Americans

Started by SophieD, June 14, 2017, 09:47:54 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.


itsApril

Interesting read.  Thanks for posting this, SophieD!

Polling/statistical analysis on sexual orientation and gender is tough, because you can never be sure you're getting reliable data.  We all know that LGBT populations are strongly under-estimated because of lingering social stigma, with trans folks being the most stigmatized, and hence the most "hidden."

The accuracy and reliability of polling are also suspect because of the slipperiness of the categories involved.  Here's an example from the Pew analysis that SophieD linked:

"In Pew Research Center's 2013 survey of LGBT Americans, 40% of respondents said they were bisexual, while 36% identified as gay men, 19% as lesbians and 5% as transgender."

Very nice!  40% + 36% + 19% + 5% = 100%.  So Pew has accounted for everybody, right?  Wrong!

For simplicity, Pew has broken down LGBT people into four mutually exclusive categories and asked respondents to sort themselves into one bucket or another, to the exclusion of the others.  That isn't how people live their lives.  And still less how people live their sex lives.

Let me give you an example: me.  I'm an MTF transwoman.  When I was a teenager, everyone just assumed I was a gay boy.  (That's what I thought, too!)  It took me a few years to sort through my feelings and identify the fundamental gender identity issue that set me on the path to transition.

I have always been sexually attracted to and active with male partners.  But as Andrew (the old me) faded and April emerged, I've discovered I am more and more sexually attracted to women as well.

So if I had been interviewed as a teenager by Pew, they would have classified me as a gay man.  If I had been interviewed a little later, they would classify me as transgender.

But that's not right, either.  It's too simple.  As a teenager, my orientation was "gay," because it was directed towards other males.  As my transfemale identity emerged, the object of my attraction (i.e., men) remained the same.  But as I subjectively expressed more and more as a woman, my orientation shifted from "gay" to "straight."  Weird, huh?

But that's not the end of it.  Because as I gradually came to recognize my growing attraction to women, my sexual orientation is evolving to bisexual.  I guess the best description of me now is a bisexual transwoman.

For the sake of analysis, Pew would pigeonhole me in the 5% of the LGBT population that is "trans."  But really, I've been all over Pew's map in the course of the last twenty years.  All of us are a lot more complicated than Pew understands.  Even though I've been all over Pew's theoretical landscape (with the exception that I've never identified as completely lesbian), I've always been the same person: me.

Even with the theoretical limitations of studies like Pew publishes, I'm still glad to see them.  They make a very important point.  We're not alone.  There are, in fact, MILLIONS of us.
-April
  •  

LindseyP

Quote from: itsApril on June 14, 2017, 12:03:08 PM
Polling/statistical analysis on sexual orientation and gender is tough, because you can never be sure you're getting reliable data.  We all know that LGBT populations are strongly under-estimated because of lingering social stigma, with trans folks being the most stigmatized, and hence the most "hidden."
You raised some good points and laid out your arguments well.  As I was reading this section, all I could think was that given the job prospects many in our community face, I can see many that are in the higher incomes fearing that they have more to lose and staying in the woodwork.  I have two kids and my wife is significantly under-employed.  For the last 20+ years, we've effectively been a single income household with all that sitting on my shoulders.  How could I do anything to put that at risk.

I have personally become a little more lax - but I was really militant about showing care for my digital footprint out in cis-land at one point.  I still remember that tinge of fear about having gender identity show up as a diagnosis code on my medical record.  But eventually there were things I wanted from my medical professionals that were more important to me than holding onto fear.  I participated in the 2015 Transgender Survey and plan on answering honestly in the next US Census if the questions give me a chance to.  But I haven't forgotten feeling that fear and I haven't forgotten why I felt that way.

"There are some modest differences by household income as well, with those making less than $36,000 annually more likely to say they are LGBT (5.5%) than those with higher incomes. These differences may be driven in part by age. There are virtually no differences by education level."


  •